When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
HI guys,
this is my first prom burn for a Corvette 1990 Auto L98 SD with 215cc heads, "CC 12-422-8"- (Similar to Hot Cam) and stock injectors with TPI.
Can you have a look at the bin setup and let me know your opinions? I am very new to this, any help here would be appreciated
My afr is around 13.4 to 14.4 at 850 to 1200 rpm, IAC at around 90 steps at 850rpm manifold air pressure at 57 kpa. I have adjusted the Throttle blades slightly. Spark advance not adjusted yet.
Last edited by (vette)master; Jul 25, 2010 at 08:00 AM.
Reason: Chart add
Are you saying you have already put in a new chip and the datalog (ALDL) is showing you what's going on at idle?
BTW small mistake "Oxygen sensor voltage is around 1014.21 ma" should be mV (millivolts) not ma (mA - millamps).
Yes this is the chip I have burned after some emulating and datalogging.
Corrected Oxygen sensor voltage and loaded spark main table up too. I had to load this up in Tuner pro as my registered Tuner Pro RT keeps crashing in Windows 7 64 bit. The upper window is from my Notebook and is Windows Media Centre :o
Last edited by (vette)master; Jul 25, 2010 at 05:08 AM.
It appears to me this is a test at idle and I presume in closed loop mode. My understanding is that in closed loop mode the computer controls the afr to 14.7 automatically. So I am not sure what your intent is here in this test as far as fuel ratios go.
Again I wouldn't think base timing at idle would be something you would expect to alter from a base tune. Shouldn't base idle be around 8 deg btdc. Wouldn't expect advance to be 22 deg at idle! Did you make it do that?
From what I have gathered a lot of the gains to be had by custom tuning are in open loop mode during acceleration or WOT. This is where the afr and spark advance would come into play to make hp gains.
The datalogger only measures sensor outputs but does not measure hp and torque. The acid test is a driving test I suppose.
It appears to me this is a test at idle and I presume in closed loop mode. My understanding is that in closed loop mode the computer controls the afr to 14.7 automatically. So I am not sure what your intent is here in his test as far as fuel ratios go.
Again I wouldn't think base timing at idle would be something you would expect to alter from a base tune. Shouldn't base idle be around 8 deg btdc. Wouldn't expect advance to be 22 deg at idle! Did you make it do that?
From what I have gathered a lot of the gains to be had by custom tuning are in open loop mode during acceleration or WOT. This is where the afr and spark advance would come into play to make hp gains.
The datalogger only measures sensor outputs but does not measure hp and torque. The acid test is a driving test I suppose.
How are you getting on with your own prom tune? as i see you finally found the ECU
How are you getting on with your own prom tune? as i see you finally found the ECU
Still waiting for the tuning gear. Still trying to understand what the bin file means. Hopefully you can teach me a thing or two.
My plan at this stage is to only play with the open loop settings of afr (lean it out a bit) and spark (advance more aggressively). I am mainly gearing up for drag racing.
My heads were shaved recently so the compression was increased and base timing was increased. It started to ping on first start-up. I am now running 98 octane fuel to deal with this. I note in your datalogging there seemed to be a non-zero knock count. Maybe your timing is too advanced at idle.
I note that you are running a MAP system whereas I am running a MAF system. So we are on quite different tuning paths.
Have to ask the question
Why 215cc heads with a TPI.
Most are only running 195's on hot 383's with a 230 /236 .575 lift cam and aftermarket intake like a Miniram or HSR
I don't see how your 218/224 .500 lift cam works with those heads notwithstanding the upper revs breathing restrictions of a TPI
I wouldn't think base timing at idle would be something you would expect to alter from a base tune. Shouldn't base idle be around 8 deg btdc. Wouldn't expect advance to be 22 deg at idle! Did you make it do that?
SA shown is base plus what the ECM is adding
Have a look at the SA table for your stock ARAP bin.
20 degrees @idle no load
Exactly same as old skool carb cars where vac can on dist advanced spark under
low load ( hi vac ) situations like idle and cruise
This is why you have to disconnect ECM control of spark to set base timing; as soon as you move the dist position ,ECM will change timing to compensate if it still has control
SA shown is base plus what the ECM is adding
Have a look at the SA table for your stock ARAP bin.
20 degrees @idle no load
Exactly same as old skool carb cars where vac can on dist advanced spark under
low load ( hi vac ) situations like idle and cruise
This is why you have to disconnect ECM control of spark to set base timing; as soon as you move the dist position ,ECM will change timing to compensate if it still has control
Thanks for the information. Is the knock count of 12 shown anything to worry about?
Why is the target afr 14.5 rather than 14.7? What are O2 cross counts?
It appears to me this is a test at idle and I presume in closed loop mode. My understanding is that in closed loop mode the computer controls the afr to 14.7 automatically. So I am not sure what your intent is here in his test as far as fuel ratios go.
The ECM will try to keep the AFR at 14.7. It can only do this if you have programmed the needed parameters in the tune. If you have modded the motor, you have to mod the chip. The factory program will not be able to compensate.
The 14.5 target has been set by the programmer as the AFR he needs. Its only a target. The O2 #s constantly swing rich to lean as the ECM makes small corrections.
The BLM is the number the ECM uses to calculate fuel corrections. 128 is perfect. + or - 8 seems to the accepted number that the ECM can reliably keep the AFR at 14.7. I'm not an expert and not that good at explaining things. This is just general information. Some others here and on other forums can give detailed answers. There are some very sharp guys out there tuning .
The 14.5 target has been set by the programmer as the AFR he needs. Its only a target. The O2 #s constantly swing rich to lean as the ECM makes small corrections.
The BLM is the number the ECM uses to calculate fuel corrections. 128 is perfect. + or - 8 seems to the accepted number that the ECM can reliably keep the AFR at 14.7. I'm not an expert and not that good at explaining things. This is just general information. Some others here and on other forums can give detailed answers. There are some very sharp guys out there tuning .
You correct I did set the AFR to 14.5 and this was an error. I put it back to 14.73. Thanks for reminding me
My BLM is now fluctuating at between 122 and 128 now but its seems to be AFR 14.73 = BLM 122 and AFR 12.3 =BLM 128? richer under acceleration and BLM drops to 122. I also noticed you can change the BLM min and max?
Have to ask the question
Why 215cc heads with a TPI.
Most are only running 195's on hot 383's with a 230 /236 .575 lift cam and aftermarket intake like a Miniram or HSR
I don't see how your 218/224 .500 lift cam works with those heads notwithstanding the upper revs breathing restrictions of a TPI
Got a good deal on the heads and 383 is in the pipeline. Cam was bigger XR288HR but I took it out after 70 miles. TPI is off when the LT1 or miniram comes eventually.
Last edited by (vette)master; Jul 26, 2010 at 10:18 PM.
Have to ask the question
Why 215cc heads with a TPI.
Most are only running 195's on hot 383's with a 230 /236 .575 lift cam and aftermarket intake like a Miniram or HSR
I don't see how your 218/224 .500 lift cam works with those heads notwithstanding the upper revs breathing restrictions of a TPI
Could you explain this a bit:
???cc Stock heads
195cc heads
215cc heads
The volume of the heads is getting larger here. Therefore the simple conclusion is compression is decreasing. Compression decreasing equates to less horsepower!
I just noticed that the BLM value of 112 is for cell4 (there are 16 cells across the rev range and airflow range). This is interesting because I would expect that at idle you should be sittiing in cell0. To get up into cell4 you must be sucking a lot of air into the engine and hence a lot of fuel (is this something to do with the IAC or the throttle blade adjustment you spoke about?). The value of 112 shows that the ecm has leaned out the mixture due to a rich condition at idle. See the following link:
The volume of the heads is getting larger here. Therefore the simple conclusion is compression is decreasing. Compression decreasing equates to less horsepower!
What am I missing here?
Volume refers to head intake port volume ; stock alum heads are 165cc?
Combustion chamber size is completely different value
typically 54cc - 76 cc for SBC
A head of a certain intake port size is often available in different chamber sizes to allow
people to build hi or low compression ( blower ) engines
Go too big in port size on a small(ish ) engine and you have a big slug of air to get moving everytime you hit the gas =Bog .Same effect as running a 750DP Holley on a 308
Maintaining port flow velocity is one of the keys to good throttle response
Superior port design and machining lets a quality head like a AFR 195 flow more cfm than some other ( think Chinese ) 210+cc heads .That is why the flow (cfm ) figures are a better guide to head performance than the port size alone
The volume of the heads is getting larger here. Therefore the simple conclusion is compression is decreasing. Compression decreasing equates to less horsepower!