Fuel Pressure Question
I think 38 PSI minimum is normal (this is for my 1987 - not sure about 1985). It could be that your pump can't keep up with the fuel usage. Do a fuel pump flow check by disconnecting your fuel line and seeing how long it takes to fill a container.
Last edited by Lemme; Aug 7, 2010 at 09:28 PM.
The car never surpasses 30 PSI except before the car is started, fuel pressure is about 35 psi, after car is started it goes down
GM pressures differ depending on the year of the car. Even some car manuals give different pressures as "normal". My 96 LT1 calls for 41-47 psi with the vacuum hose DISCONNECTED. It will be lower with the hose connected but by how much depends on how much vacuum the engine pulls.
As I recall it's on the order of 1 psi in FP reduction for each 2" of vacuum. You can do the math.
Some drive all the time with their FP vacuum hose disconnected and the vacuum port plugged in order to increase their FP.
Jake
I've burned a dime size hole in the top of a forged piston from being too lean. You've got to get your problem addressed before it's too late.
Jake
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I have a question, I have a Holley AFPR that I had on the car before but it leaked, does it used a stock diaphragm? the stock diaphragm has a spring connected to it where the Holley doesn't, is there a replacement i can get from Holley for this specific AFPR?
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/HLY-512-501/ This is the AFPR I have.
Otherwise I'd just buy a new AFPR.
With regards to your adjustable fuel pressure regulator, it looks like the kit includes it all. Most other AFPR's use a stock diaphragm. FIC recommends those sold by TPiS. The "stock" diaphragm for the 85 FPR is no longer available, it is not the same diaphragm for other years of the TPI however. If you can find a NOS one, it generally runs $150. If I was to use one of the "stock" replacements they currently have listed for my 85, I would have to use it in conjunction with the adjustable housing to get the correct pressure.
After I get my fuel pump done and I am sure she's holding pressure, I will swap out the stock FPR for an adjustable one to get the most out of the new Bocsh III's.
Anyway, the bottom line is there was no "standard" for how long or at what rate the pressure should decrease once the engine is shut down. I came way with the conclusion that as long as there was no sudden, dramatic drop in pressure , like going from, say 40 psi to 20 psi instantly, the drop rate didn't really matter.
On top of that, I've never come across any GM spec on that, or in any other manual for that matter. If anyone knows of one I'm sure we'd all like to see it.
Jake
It lists the GM recommended fuel pressure for the 1985 as 34-40 psi.
In 86/87 it went to 37-43; 88 thru 90 41-47; LT5 48-55; 91 thru 93 also 41-47.
Hope this helps.
Jake
It lists the GM recommended fuel pressure for the 1985 as 34-40 psi.
In 86/87 it went to 37-43; 88 thru 90 41-47; LT5 48-55; 91 thru 93 also 41-47.
Hope this helps.
Jake
I installed the TPiS regulator on my 85 and I set my pressure to approx 40psi. I replaced the original injectors with Bosche III from FIC. I also run the SR intake. The increased pressure and better atomization from the Bosche III's did give me an increase in performance.
I don't think its a bad fuel pump, I replaced it less than a week ago. If I clamp my return line on the gas tank the pressure goes up to 60-65psi and holds.
I want to get new injectors but if I don't have to, then I won't.
Is the difference between 30psi and 40psi that big of a difference performance wise? My guess is that it is all the difference because before I tore into this whole SuperRam ordeal my pressure was fine and I was running the ASM big tube runners and all was well.
I installed the TPiS regulator on my 85 and I set my pressure to approx 40psi. I replaced the original injectors with Bosche III from FIC. I also run the SR intake. The increased pressure and better atomization from the Bosche III's did give me an increase in performance.
Check Chart "A", page #1, lower right corner of the page, and again on PAGE #26, Chart "Q", lower left corner of the page. Both charts show exactly the same thing.
I try to be as accurate as I can when post stuff like this. Some guys shoot from the hip, but I try, as best I can, not to give out incorrect or unsupported information. But that's just me.
Also, I disagree, too with your conclusion as to the purpose, as to why that section in the book was written. Sorta cynical don't you think, especially when TPIS supported it with their dyno results?
I've been seeing this more and more lately, evidence of cynicism. Guys will read something then post that the reason the author wrote it is because the company paid them to or is a BIG advertiser, etc. That's text-book cynicism.
Jake
Check Chart "A", page #1, lower right corner of the page, and again on PAGE #26, Chart "Q", lower left corner of the page. Both charts show exactly the same thing.
I try to be as accurate as I can when post stuff like this. Some guys shoot from the hip, but I try, as best I can, not to give out incorrect or unsupported information. But that's just me.
Also, I disagree, too with your conclusion as to the purpose, as to why that section in the book was written. Sorta cynical don't you think, especially when TPIS supported it with their dyno results?
I've been seeing this more and more lately, evidence of cynicism. Guys will read something then post that the reason the author wrote it is because the company paid them to or is a BIG advertiser, etc. That's text-book cynicism.
Jake
I happen to believe what TPiS published. To deny that they use their book to help sell parts is unrealistic. I don't have their book in front of me as you do, but as I remember they published dyno results for a stock 85 motor and one with an adjustable regulator. The increased fuel pressure produced more HP. I got the same results on my motor when I installed their AFPR and set it to 40psi.
Now back to the OP's original issue. I'm trying to convey to this young man who doesn't have a lot of money that the pressure he is seeing on the rail on his 85 is very close to the stock fixed pressure my 85 used to have. I doubt his performance issues are related to the fuel pressure at the rail. However, if he is still running the original injectors there is a good possibility they are part of the problem. When I removed my original injectors I found tips broken off. And I definitely got better performance from new ones.
Unfortunately, there is no way to test for clogged injectors. You can ohm test but that doesn't tell you if fuel is flowing.
I happen to believe what TPiS published. To deny that they use their book to help sell parts is unrealistic. I don't have their book in front of me as you do, but as I remember they published dyno results for a stock 85 motor and one with an adjustable regulator. The increased fuel pressure produced more HP. I got the same results on my motor when I installed their AFPR and set it to 40psi.
Now back to the OP's original issue. I'm trying to convey to this young man who doesn't have a lot of money that the pressure he is seeing on the rail on his 85 is very close to the stock fixed pressure my 85 used to have. I doubt his performance issues are related to the fuel pressure at the rail. However, if he is still running the original injectors there is a good possibility they are part of the problem. When I removed my original injectors I found tips broken off. And I definitely got better performance from new ones.
Unfortunately, there is no way to test for clogged injectors. You can ohm test but that doesn't tell you if fuel is flowing.
It's basically because I've been reading such comments so often lately on all the 8 or 10 other Forums I regularly visit. Seems like an epidemic starting, attributing ulterior, less than honest, genuine motives to claims and representations made by the author. Perhaps if you had the same degree of exposure as I have you'd better see and understand my concerns.
"Remember that part of their hints book was to sell their adjustable fuel pressure regulator". I'll just leave it to others to decide for themselves if that is the purpose or not for the information and extensive testing included in the book.
I took it as a scientific, engineering approach to discover and share the results of altering fuel pressure, not as a marketing strategy. Here again each has to make his own call.
One guy posts it, unsupported. Then others pick it up and pass it along and before you'd know, it takes on the semblance of truth and accuracy. I believe this is how so much "bad" information gets spread around the web.
Anyway, that's enough on that, so let's just put it behind us and move on. I'm Good.
Jake









