Carburetor performance?


Be sure to route the fuel back to the tank to prevent vapor lock. at low vehicle speeds you will percolate the fuel and cause vaporlock if you don't. The biggest contributor of the underhood temps are the bottom breathing cooling air and the SMC that the car is made of. These alone may help reduce your overall horsepower output by elevated fuel temps. This is one reason the fuel injection system works so well in warmer climates and hotter running engines.
Expect your fuel mileage to drop 5-7 miles per gallon as well.
As Rodj said, lets see some dyno sheets. I doubt that you(davenbocafl) know what 400 hp IS. You were probably around 230 hp in "phase 1" and maybe "300 in Phase II"
lol.
Edelbrock 600cfm carter style carb with, Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake, Patriot Performance SB-Chevy 190CC Freedom Series Heads, Lunati 60101LK - Lunati Voodoo Hydraulic Camshaft Duration @ .050 IN/EX : 213°/219° Gross Valve lift IN/EX .454''/.468'' . I prob picked up about 100 horses. Sucker pulled hard all the way to 6500 rpms.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
As for the FPR, you can get one from summit/Jegs anywhere really. The regulator sets/"makes" the pressure, not the pump. The stock pump will work fine with a FPR setting the pressure to ~5 pounds. No problem there at all. Either way, a failed FPR won't be causing the carb to flood. It would leak itself.
This is something that I've actually DONE, so I know of what I speak. Also, I did produce objective results so I'm not talking out of my SOTP meter, here.
I re-encourage you to keep the EFI and port the crap out of it. You'll end up equal to or ahead of where a carb will put you, but retain easy starting, good running, fuel economy, etc.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Feb 6, 2011 at 04:58 PM.
I suppose it's possible to do, but using 70's stock heads (ported),among other things, it's a little hard to swallow. Your claims about picking up 125hp with a carb swap on a CFI helps to discredit you. I assure you, I have no "circuit breakers blown" or problems.
EDIT: I see ONE point of misunderstanding: I thought your 620hp claim was that YOU built a 620hp 283. I re-read and see that you RAN such an engine. Why, when 350's were available, is beyond me, but whatever. Again, what rodj said. That you ran an engine tha made 620 through a carb has zero bearing on the topic at hand. To fuelers have made over 6000hp through carbs. So if the OP puts a carb on his '84 long block, is he going to make 6000+hp? No. There is no relevance here. Your 620 horse drag car has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Feb 6, 2011 at 05:20 PM.
As you are well aware,
you and I ( + many others) never discounted the Renegade as a vast improvement over a stock CFI. The argument was over the purported improvement claims by two people before intake was even available

Class racing.(weight / ci )
You build a 5000lb '66 Chevy station wagon , put a 283 in and run in Z/Super stock
Last edited by rodj; Feb 6, 2011 at 07:08 PM.








HAHAHAHHAHAHA!!! That's some rich stuff there. hahaha. 620/283. Right. We're going to wear out the BS flag in this thread!