When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
When I saw the thread title I was going to post a pic of an old AMC Matador, then I saw you're SERIOUS about this.
I'll stay tuned for sure now.
My suggestion would be to do some bracing of the front suspension (I'm thinking angle braces for the upper control arm mounts) and any other torsional stiffness improvements. Chassis stiffness of the C4 was great when they were new, but compared to current new cars it's just average.
Speaking of which, since you have it torn down this far (if I were you) I'd weld in the targa top (and I mean fully weld the entire front and rear mating joints) to get rid of the bolt system. I think that done correctly it would make a significant difference in chassis stiffness.
When I saw the thread title I was going to post a pic of an old AMC Matador, then I saw you're SERIOUS about this.
I'll stay tuned for sure now.
My suggestion would be to do some bracing of the front suspension (I'm thinking angle braces for the upper control arm mounts) and any other torsional stiffness improvements. Chassis stiffness of the C4 was great when they were new, but compared to current new cars it's just average.
Speaking of which, since you have it torn down this far (if I were you) I'd weld in the targa top (and I mean fully weld the entire front and rear mating joints) to get rid of the bolt system. I think that done correctly it would make a significant difference in chassis stiffness.
I thought about this a lot. I was thinking about tig welding all the the seams where the frame was spot welded together. I did lots of studying what I could do to stiffen the frame. I used a picture off another thread to draw up a custom roll bar setup. Here is what I was thinking of doing with 1.50X.095 DOM.
That looks good, but I'd make sure to pick up the front frame section ahead of the steering with an L shaped bar tying in at the firewall where your drawing shows the upper bar attaching - and if there is any way you can connect the left and right sides of that, say across the top of the radiator area, that would really help a lot.
The front suspension braces usually brace the upper a-arm mounts, that's why I was suggesting the welded gussets.
That looks good, but I'd make sure to pick up the front frame section ahead of the steering with an L shaped bar tying in at the firewall where your drawing shows the upper bar attaching - and if there is any way you can connect the left and right sides of that, say across the top of the radiator area, that would really help a lot.
The front suspension braces usually brace the upper a-arm mounts, that's why I was suggesting the welded gussets.
I was thinking about that and other things to do. I was just sharing some of the plans I was going to do. Thanks for the input.
I got the firewall completely off and now she is in the nude! You can see where I stopped sanding last year! I'm glad I wasted my time since I changed my mind and now I want to send it in for media blasting and powder coating. Progress is going to be slow since the wife wants to look for a house! So for now I'm just selling parts to save up for the roll bars and frame mods.
If I was going that far....I would junk the c4 suspension. It would have c6 suspension with a torque tube and the tunnel. I've measured and it will fit with a few mods and shorten the torque tube.
If I was going that far....I would junk the c4 suspension. It would have c6 suspension with a torque tube and the tunnel. I've measured and it will fit with a few mods and shorten the torque tube.
I agree. One of the guys on here with a dedicated C4 race car said that if he modded his suspension more it wouldn't be a C4 anymore - but a stock C5 z06 will pull away from him on a road course. OF course, chassis stiffness of the C5/6 is a big part of the improvement as well.
If I was going that far....I would junk the c4 suspension. It would have c6 suspension with a torque tube and the tunnel. I've measured and it will fit with a few mods and shorten the torque tube.
That sounds like sweet idea! But I want to stay with the C4 suspension. Plus I already have the parts. My wife is cool but I think she would freak if I started buying all the extra parts! I would love to see it though!
I'm shooting to match or beat the C6 Supernatural LM GT2. It was built off the C4 chassis and it was a killer track car. Yes I know in 95. I know its going to be hard to match it in a street car but I'm in for the challenge. Making a dream into reality! Plus we have the technology to build a race car from the 90s. We can buy aluminum block engines and build carbon fiber components at our finger tips!
COPO I have to say I love the work you did on your C4!
shakedown067 posted a thead http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c4-t...post1583607969 showed how much movement there is in the batwing. I came up with a solution to give more support. I will be doing this mod on my car!
If I was going that far....I would junk the c4 suspension. It would have c6 suspension with a torque tube and the tunnel. I've measured and it will fit with a few mods and shorten the torque tube.
I really like how you think! I gotta learn how to weld!!!!
Nice project! I don't envy you on the hours ahead.....
I would recommend not using 1.5" x .095" DOM for your cage. I know you may not end up racing with NASA or SCCA but you may want to sell the car to someone down the road that will. A poor cage will hurt the value in the long run. Even if you go with just a 4 pt. for now.
Here are the basic size requirements for NASA (SCCA also):
2501 - 3000 lb Car
1.500” x 0.120” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical) or DOM
1.750” x 0.095” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical) or DOM
***** 1.750” x 0.120” ERW* (No issuance of log books for cars with ERW cages) *Note- Specifications listed only for reference for inspection of grandfathered vehicles.
3001 - 4000 lbs
1.750” x .120” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical) or DOM
No ERW allowed
And here is a link to the full rules (Go to 15.6 for cages)
Nice project! I don't envy you on the hours ahead.....
I would recommend not using 1.5" x .095" DOM for your cage. I know you may not end up racing with NASA or SCCA but you may want to sell the car to someone down the road that will. A poor cage will hurt the value in the long run. Even if you go with just a 4 pt. for now.
Here are the basic size requirements for NASA (SCCA also):
2501 - 3000 lb Car
1.500” x 0.120” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical) or DOM
1.750” x 0.095” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical) or DOM
***** 1.750” x 0.120” ERW* (No issuance of log books for cars with ERW cages) *Note- Specifications listed only for reference for inspection of grandfathered vehicles.
3001 - 4000 lbs
1.750” x .120” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical) or DOM
No ERW allowed
And here is a link to the full rules (Go to 15.6 for cages)
Ok I guess I'll let the cat out of the bag! I was going to keep it a secert till the end but I want to explain. My target car weight is under 2500 lbs. NASA requires 1.500” x 0.095” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical) or DOM for cars under 2500 lbs.
I know it's a crazy weight goal! But I have been crunching weight numbers on a excel sheet for each part. So far I have 2257 lbs without body. I have almost all the parts listed with custom roll bars. The birdcage has to weigh around 350-400 lbs because I can lift the front and back. I also added weight to some parts to make sure im not underestimating. Most of the body's weight is in the hood and doors.
Now if my weight starts going above 2500 lbs I will be putting 1.750” x 0.095” Seamless Alloy (4130), Seamless mild steel (CDS Mechanical) or DOM. I will say I'm going to be surprised if I get it under 2500lbs.