When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Cool view! Looks ok to me, thats why everything is mounted with bushings to allow for some movement. I would run a bit more pressure in the tires though.
Thanks. Hell I'm running 34psi now. Not even rolling over all the way to the side groove yet (technical term is escaping me at the moment). Actually a good distance from it.
Certainly didn't over tighten them, at least I didn't. Only changed the rear bolts a few months ago.
Last edited by shakedown067; Mar 15, 2013 at 04:33 PM.
Cool view! Looks ok to me, thats why everything is mounted with bushings to allow for some movement.
I don't agree. The C-beam is not mounted to the diff w/bushings (as you know) nor is it to the trans. There should be very very little movement in that direction. I think something is broken or bent. The Diff in my CTS-V moves that much...but that's b/c it's mounted in three mushy rubber blobs...all in close proximity to the centerline of the diff. The C4 has a lever-arm that is ~8' long. There should be very little movement, IMO.
Talking about the mounting bushings on the bat wing and suspension. If parts don't give they break. Think about it, diff & drive line connected to trans & bolted to the engine which moves quite a bit under hard throttle.
Think about it, diff & drive line connected to trans & bolted to the engine which moves quite a bit under hard throttle.
I have thought about it. The engine does move (rotates, mostly) with stock motor mounts... but for it to accommodate the movement in THAT vid, it would have to be rising from it's mounts a good 6"! I hope the OP's engine isn't moving that much. I think the C beam is deflecting or there is a loose or broken bolt. Another vid is in order...this one of the C-beam!
the C-beam is solid mount at both ends to prevent movement in that way.. the batwing ears are 90 degrees to that so they would have to be gone to allow that movement.
So...the batwing and trans should move together...if at all but it has to be very limited..only what the diff mount ears would allow and that ain;t much.
I'd start by looking hard at the trans bolts in the beam...rear end bolts too.. I'd even take a close look at the lattice of the batwing! thats tweaking way too much for aluminum to be happy...thats a loose or broken mount or possibly broken batwing the way it twist with the torque.
somethins not right !
Sure doesnt look right to me. Hard for me to believe the c beam can deflect that much without something being loose or broken.
for it to move like that I would think it would be at diff end of the c beam.
That may very well be what's missing! STOCK PARTS ! It would be interesting to put at least the stock lower control arms back in the car and do the same "visual". Beam plates are conversational, but with one video in "the can" I believe I'd go about replacing everything that has "heim joints" with conventional bushing stock parts and try it. There's nothing to be lost and it could be very educational. If the "heim joints" create this issue there's no doubt that there's wear being created at the rear and front beam mounts and the "beam plates" would certainly aid in the constant re-torquing that's going to be required. This might be a very good reason to consider the beam plates. It would seem that what's been documented here would indicate there's constant wear on both the transmission and differential mounting bolt bores.
I don't see how the batwing bushings could deflect in that direction, that much. Look at the angle of deflection...not just the amount in inches...
Originally Posted by WVZR-1
That may very well be what's missing! STOCK PARTS ! It would be interesting to put at least the stock lower control arms back in the car and do the same "visual". Beam plates are conversational, but with one video in "the can" I believe I'd go about replacing everything that has "heim joints" with conventional bushing stock parts and try it. There's nothing to be lost and it could be very educational. If the "heim joints" create this issue there's no doubt that there's wear being created at the rear and front beam mounts and the "beam plates" would certainly aid in the constant re-torquing that's going to be required. This might be a very good reason to consider the beam plates. It would seem that what's been documented here would indicate there's constant wear on both the transmission and differential mounting bolt bores.
Do you have all of the OE parts still?
How could heim joints for the suspension possibly have an effect on this issue??
The issue is the rearward rotation of the diff, under acceleration. The suspension (no matter how it's secured) has no impact on those forces. It's ALL about the C-beam. That is 1 of the 2, C-beam's jobs, is to prevent the rearward or forward rotation of the diff, under acceleration and deceleration, respectively. LONG before slapping stock, mushy bushings back into the suspension, as a test, I'd inspect the item who's job is to prevent that motion. I'd inspect the C-beam.