C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

LT4 Valve Help (with pics)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2013 | 05:39 PM
  #21  
rklessdriver's Avatar
rklessdriver
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 431
From: Dale City VA
Default

Originally Posted by jmh139
Quick question. I have the rocker arms off at this point. Is a compression test valid? I am getting only 30 PSI on one of the cylinders. Not sure if it is my gauge or not, but am getting 120 on one of the other cylinders. What in the heads could cause this?

I used my borescope and see no damage to the cylinder walls or the pistons. Pistons have a good bit of black soot on them though.
You cannot do a compression test with the rockers off....

You can do a leak down test.
Will
Reply
Old May 4, 2013 | 09:44 PM
  #22  
jmh139's Avatar
jmh139
Thread Starter
Advanced
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

Makes sense then, no leak down was holding air fine. I just realized that no air could get in if the cylinders if the rockers were off...

Originally Posted by rklessdriver
You cannot do a compression test with the rockers off....

You can do a leak down test.
Will
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 04:51 PM
  #23  
aboatguy's Avatar
aboatguy
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,641
Likes: 13
From: Slidell Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by 96GS#007
Built plenty of LTx engines. Never had one "gush" water and never used gasket sealer.
Never had one gush water either.... I use Teflon thread lube/sealant on all bolts that enter the water jacket or oil passages


Mike
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2013 | 04:58 PM
  #24  
jmh139's Avatar
jmh139
Thread Starter
Advanced
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

After taking the drivers side valve cover off, I discovered one of the rockers spun sideways (and damaged) with the half moon keepers for the valve laying in the valley below (it had not made it into the engine thank goodness). The spring had not come all the way off, the rocker arm was barely holding it on.

When I got both heads off, I found no damage to the pistons or cylinder wall.

I called the guy who rebuilt the engine for me and he said he will fix it, but says there must have been something defective with the GM hot cam kit I bought. I am trying to figure out what happened.

Both heads had small springs laying in them when I took the valve covers off, which come from the rubber valve caps I believe (see pics in 1st post). Only one valve was damaged, that I mentioned above, valve seems fine, just the keepers (two half moon shape) were off it.

From reading what is posted here, I am thinking he did not take into account the hot cam and adjusted the valves incorrectly? Would this have caused this damage? Would it have possibly damaged the cam?

Or could it be that the push rods are the wrong length? He purchased them, they did not come with the kit.

Thanks for all the help!


Originally Posted by mtwoolford
First, there has been a significant deviation in your valve train from stock. LT4's came with a NON adjustable pedistal type valve train; the rockers simply were tighten down onto the top of the pedestal (which is a rocker arm stud with a shoulder built into it) and the retaining nut (which appears the same but is NOT to be confused with the adjusting nut on a normal valve train) is tightened to a set torque value.

Your LT4 "Hot Cam kit " substitues an adjustable rocker arm stud and nut.

I'm NOT saying this is what happened, but if your builder attempted to adjust the valve train according to STOCK LT4 spec's and procedures, every thing on that valve train is / was completely out of whack.

LT4 hot cam with 1.6 rockers lift = 0.525 inch; max lift for LT4 hot cam springs before coil bind = 0.525 inch; so yes adjustment and geometry is pretty crucial.

The good news is that new LT4 Hot Cam springs are about $45 , which with a set of valve seals should get you up and running, after of course sorting out any valve train geometry problems that may, or may not, require a new set of push rods of the proper length.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2013 | 02:09 AM
  #25  
mtwoolford's Avatar
mtwoolford
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 195
From: folsom california
Default

[QUOTE=jmh139;1584140794]After taking the drivers side valve cover off, I discovered one of the rockers spun sideways (and damaged) with the half moon keepers for the valve laying in the valley below (it had not made it into the engine thank goodness). The spring had not come all the way off, the rocker arm was barely holding it on.

I called the guy who rebuilt the engine for me and he said he will fix it, but says there must have been something defective with the GM hot cam kit I bought. I am trying to figure out what happened.

From reading what is posted here, I am thinking he did not take into account the hot cam and adjusted the valves incorrectly? Would this have caused this damage? Would it have possibly damaged the cam?

Thanks for all the help![/QUOTE)

I looked up what the original LT4 rocker arm part number was for the then unique , one year only, pedastal mount : 12557779;

I then looked up what comes in the LT4 hot cam kit: 809-19210729;

I then looked up 809-19210729 in the 2012 GM Performance catalogue and read this notation: "similiar to 1996 Corvette LT4 engine except trunnions have been machined for EARLY 3/8" ROCKER STUDS (emphasis added).

Soooo, if your machinists just installed the Hot Cam kit, and didn't remove the original LT4 pedestal rocker studs and replace them with early style 3/8" rocker studs, everything was probably doomed from the get go.

The up side, no irrepairable damage was done to the engine. And if it makes you feel any better, even when the stock so called "self aligning" rockers are correctly installed, it is not unusual (in my experience) to find one askew on the valve stem tip. I think the locating "ears" are a little too small to be 100% effective; but thats just my opinion.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2013 | 06:43 PM
  #26  
Purple92's Avatar
Purple92
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 863
Default

While you have everything apart - you might want to consider going with Better Valve Springs and Better Retainers. The factory stuff is certainly not junk, but I've personally seen two retainer failures with the LT4 spring retainers (both of these happened at HPDE events), and both involved a valve contacting a piston. Comp Cams, Crane, Isky, Manley and others all make hardware that will stand up to hard use better than the factory stuff. Generally speaking - you want a valve spring that has at least 0.080" difference between the lift (at the valve) of the cam you're using and "coil bind".

Don't take my word - ask a couple of Engine Builders (not general mechanics - but guys who make their living putting together engines that will be used in High Performance / Competition applications) what they think of factory springs / retainers.

Just my $0.02
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2013 | 08:51 PM
  #27  
jmh139's Avatar
jmh139
Thread Starter
Advanced
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

I finally found my paperwork and he installed ARP 134-7101 rocker arm studs, which I think should be fine from my searches, at least others have used them with LT4 heads
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/arp-134-7101

Push rods he used show LLP LPR-5-7150 but I cannot find that part number online. Pushrods are labeled 1912 7.150" X 0.80 WALL

Valve guides: SBI 140-8180
http://www.cnc-motorsports.com/valve...-140-8180.html

Everything else came from the GM LT4 Hot Cam Kit
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/nal-12480002

Also this information is listed in the paperwork:
Intake Valve Lash: 1 +/- 1/4 TURN DOWN FROM ZERO
Exhaust Valve Lash: 1 +/- 1/4 TURN DOWN FROM ZERO
Lash Adjustment Method: ADJUSTING SCREW

Again, I appreciate everyone reading and commenting on this. Jay


[QUOTE=mtwoolford;1584144381]
Originally Posted by jmh139
After taking the drivers side valve cover off, I discovered one of the rockers spun sideways (and damaged) with the half moon keepers for the valve laying in the valley below (it had not made it into the engine thank goodness). The spring had not come all the way off, the rocker arm was barely holding it on.

I called the guy who rebuilt the engine for me and he said he will fix it, but says there must have been something defective with the GM hot cam kit I bought. I am trying to figure out what happened.

From reading what is posted here, I am thinking he did not take into account the hot cam and adjusted the valves incorrectly? Would this have caused this damage? Would it have possibly damaged the cam?

Thanks for all the help![/QUOTE)

I looked up what the original LT4 rocker arm part number was for the then unique , one year only, pedastal mount : 12557779;

I then looked up what comes in the LT4 hot cam kit: 809-19210729;

I then looked up 809-19210729 in the 2012 GM Performance catalogue and read this notation: "similiar to 1996 Corvette LT4 engine except trunnions have been machined for EARLY 3/8" ROCKER STUDS (emphasis added).

Soooo, if your machinists just installed the Hot Cam kit, and didn't remove the original LT4 pedestal rocker studs and replace them with early style 3/8" rocker studs, everything was probably doomed from the get go.

The up side, no irrepairable damage was done to the engine. And if it makes you feel any better, even when the stock so called "self aligning" rockers are correctly installed, it is not unusual (in my experience) to find one askew on the valve stem tip. I think the locating "ears" are a little too small to be 100% effective; but thats just my opinion.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-1
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette buyer's guide

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-17 16:41:08


VIEW MORE