When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I mounted one up once but all I could see was sky!
Yep, Ken said that in the Demon I told you about that he couldn't see anything but sky for the first 400 feet, then after that it was just amazing how fast the timing towers were coming at him!
Maybe you should try mounting one under the front bumper with a slight downward angle.
Yep, Ken said that in the Demon I told you about that he couldn't see anything but sky for the first 400 feet, then after that it was just amazing how fast the timing towers were coming at him!
Maybe you should try mounting one under the front bumper with a slight downward angle.
Hi guys,i'm here with a questions about an old story i heard and i want go deeper on this:
Does the C4 frame twist under heavy pull by engine torque?
Some guys talk about the asymmetrical wiev of the rear with left side highier than right ...
Was there something in the frame that was underestimate during C4 developement ?
I'm here to collect data so let me know as much infos as you have about this stuff,thanks guy
I think you need to contact callaway they had put 898 hp and 772 lb-ft thru a C4
They drove the sledgehammer to the track and back a true road going supercar
Lets not forget this was in 1988 !!! makes a 20 years newer car the Bugatti Veyron not look like such an improvement ...
I think you need to contact callaway they had put 898 hp and 772 lb-ft thru a C4
They drove the sledgehammer to the track and back a true road going supercar
That was an awesome video
I always saw it on the recommended section on youtube, but for some reason skipped it. Great way to build confidence in a car's engineering.
Also great to hear that Lingenfelter admitted to having a slower car.
If I remember right, GM made 3 "mule" C4 Verts with the LT5 motor in them. They were trying to make a C4 Vert ZR1. They crushed 2 of them and 1 is somewhere out there. Maybe this was a legend, but lots of guys talked about it way back then. GM said the LT5 motor put too much flex on the frame and cancelled the concept. If you ask me, I think the insurance companies put pressure on GM.
So it might have been answered and by reading a lot it wont really do any damaging twists. now is there any difference if you are boosted and running with the targa off? do you think there would ever be any significant problems like it not going back on correctly if I hit boost a couple time with no top?
Thanks guys.
So it might have been answered and by reading a lot it wont really do any damaging twists. now is there any difference if you are boosted and running with the targa off? do you think there would ever be any significant problems like it not going back on correctly if I hit boost a couple time with no top?
Thanks guys.
Callaway twin-turbos do it all the time. I have a 'vert, but I've never heard of this problem from a couple owner. Remember, CTTC=562 lb/ft of torque!
My CTTC was ~700lbft at the crank. Ran with the targa off no problem, but i wasn't launching from a dead stop on slicks either.
Yep... slicks are killer for halfshafts...differentials...u-joints,if you don't abuse your car,probably the frame itself can handle even more than 1000lb/ft.
i'm curious about what kind of stress (twisting force) put down on the frame a standard Dana 44 with batwing and a solid axle like the one Vette 383 is running under his beast...