When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have seen postings of using an LT4 manifold. The LT1 manifold may work as well and I believe the fastburns have duel bolt patterns incorporated into the design. Other than that I believe the miniram III is designed to work with fastburns.
They say they will work but I had fartburn heads and my HSR would not line up the ports on the heads were too tall. I had to get vortec HSR. I don't believe they will work.
They say they will work but I had fartburn heads and my HSR would not line up the ports on the heads were too tall. I had to get vortec HSR. I don't believe they will work.
That must be new GM technology to use alternate fuels....I am referring to the fartburn heads you had.
That must be new GM technology to use alternate fuels....I am referring to the fartburn heads you had.
It's not new, the GM Fastburn heads have been around for a while. They advertise dual bolt pattern Vortec and reg SBC but they have the raise ports like the LT4 heads and the runners dont match up.
Compared to all SBC's 1955->L98, I'm pretty sure that the LT1 port is raised -similar to, if not identical to, the L31 Vortec head. The LT4 port is raised...even more. Where the Fastburn heads fall, I don't know.
According to Vetteoz's link, the heads are designed to work with the L31 Vortec heads...which to ME, I'd think that would also mean that they'd be a good match for the LT1 intake. No?
Compared to all SBC's 1955->L98, I'm pretty sure that the LT1 port is raised -similar to, if not identical to, the L31 Vortec head. The LT4 port is raised...even more. Where the Fastburn heads fall, I don't know.
According to Vetteoz's link, the heads are designed to work with the L31 Vortec heads...which to ME, I'd think that would also mean that they'd be a good match for the L'm just going by what I hT1 intake. No?
Tom, I'm going by what I have read not personal experience as far as the LT1 intake goes. I have owned Fastburn heads and they did not match with the HSR intake until I purchased the Vortec version. That said I had no Idea the LT1 was also a raised runner design. I know for sure the LT4 was and know the Vortec fastburn heads are based on ported LT4 heads. So maybe it will work?Also, I believe the Fastburn heads are raised more than the production L31 heads but don't quote me on that.
Another think to consider is the Exhaust ports are also raised/and bigger. I had to go from headman headers to LT1 manifolds when I switched over.
I have a set of "062" vortec heads mounted on an engine I am building. They do NOT have the raised ports, or the "steeple ports" of the LT whatever. They simply have a 4 bolt mounting system for the manifold intake instead of the more familiar 8 bolt system.
The Vortec truck heads do have "raised ports" compared to older "non vortec" heads. Here is a Vortec head bolted with a "non-vortec" intake. Runner is raised. Raised as much as an LT4 intake? Or fastburn? I don't know.
The LT1 intake and LT4 intake have identical port locations and dimensions. The difference is the LT4 intake has more material on the port roofs that GM for what ever reason didn't port match to the LT4 heads.
The LT1 intake and LT4 intake have identical port locations and dimensions. The difference is the LT4 intake has more material on the port roofs that GM for what ever reason didn't port match to the LT4 heads.
NO:
"The aluminum heads used on the LT4 have intake port openings that are .100" higher than those found on other Gen. II heads and require a Gen II LT4 intake manifold with matching raised runners and LT4 gaskets"; CHEVROLET SMALL BLOCK PARTS INTERCHANGE MANUAL @ page 19; some internet research will produce pictures of LT1 and LT4 head and intake manifold combo's that clearly show their differences.
Allegedly the reason for the extra material in the port roof was to reduce port volume and keep LT4 horsepower down in order to not embarrass the soon to be released LS1
Allegedly the reason for the extra material in the port roof was to reduce port volume and keep LT4 horsepower down in order to not embarrass the soon to be released LS1
Hmm, I can't see that was a real worry. The LS1 heads flow SO much better than the LT1/4 that it was no contest. Stock LT1/4s were in the 265 rwhp range while early LS1s were in the 300-305 rwhp range (Lou Gigliotti's first LS1 was dynoed the day he got it at 305) and 314.6 rwhp (my very early delivery LS1 was dynoed the day after delivery and 2 days after Lou received his).
Sooo... is the fastburn head a "raised port" as in LT1/Vortec raised? Or a "wicked mega raised port", as in the LT4 with at massive .1" more "raise"?
If it were ME, I'd take the gamble that LT1 heads work with GB heads.
I'm with you that they might seal up and work. But, would you buy performance heads then block the top of the port?
The LT4 is a raised design and the Fastburns are based on CNC ported LT4 heads that means the ports are going to be even bigger and the LT1 intake if it bolts up will block the top of the ports. If I were the OP I would sell the converted intake and get an HSR or Miniram.
I'm with you that they might seal up and work. But, would you buy performance heads then block the top of the port?
The LT4 is a raised design and the Fastburns are based on CNC ported LT4 heads that means the ports are going to be even bigger and the LT1 intake if it bolts up will block the top of the ports. If I were the OP I would sell the converted intake and get an HSR or Miniram.
O.K., well I don't think that the HSR or Miniram will fit either then. Do they make HSR's with LT4 ports?
It sounds like the solution is porting the LT1 intake or and LT4 converted intake as the poster above mentioned.