Good intake choice??





Will there be a cam change done or are you keeping that stock? Stock exhaust manifolds as well?





Combined with a cat-back, you should notice the difference...though the injectors probably aren't necessary and the fuel-rail is the same as the one on your car.
If the car has the original injectors, I would suggest replacing them with the Bosch III injectors from Jon at FIC

A good exhaust system will certainly be a help. You may want to consider headers if that's in the budget. The Hedman Elites are available with either AIR connections or without.
A good tune will be very helpful too but it would be better to do all of the mods you want and then get a tune.
As far as the K&N filter, I don't believe that it will help much if at all. Decent paper air filters are cheap; I just replace the one in my '87 each year. Opening up the filter lid may help, but you probably won't "feel" anything with either one.
. Would an airfoil help with the new intake? Thanks for the help.
Edelbrock says that either piece (or both of them) will not cause any issues and the computer will handle everything. All of the other stock components on your car will bolt on with no problems. I would start with the Magnaflow system, see what it does, then go from there. I would suggest headers next, then the intake. The stock TPI really won't allow the engine to rev much past 5500 and by then the power band will show a signifigant drop. L98 motors make their power in the mid-RPM ranges.
My '87 has these mods: bored .030 (355cid), stock-style pistons, intake runners port-matched to plenum and intake, ZZ4 cam, balanced and blueprinted, lightweight flywheel, Hedman headers, true dual exhaust with an X-pipe and low-restriction mufflers. It still needs a tune but HP is right around 300-315 at the flywheel. Given the stock '87 is rated at 240 HP, that's a decent increase. It will spin my Hoosier A6 slicks in 2nd gear (4+3 trans).
I bought the car with those mods except for the headers and exhaust. I would expect that the other work (done professionally by a local Corvette shop who owned the car) would have probably run anywhere from $2000 to $3000, maybe more. The work was done some 8-9 years ago so chances are that the costs will be higher today for the same work.
Stay away from the airfoil and other similar gadgets. The don't work at all and are a waste of money.
. Would an airfoil help with the new intake? Thanks for the help.Later on, when finances allow, you can work on a larger port intake. For now just shift at 4800rpm if racing on a closed circuit and those would be the optimum shift point for your set up.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





Basically, it's got "burned-in" programming though the parameters it uses can be altered. Injector size, Timing, AFR, idle, cold-start-up, torque-converter and other functions can be controlled by changing parms.
That is called tuning. It's "tuning" the performance to be optimal. Whenever you change injector size, cam, ci, etc...you will need to "tune" your ECM so it controls the motor correctly.
FYI: There is a percentage error built it -- that's constantly correcting/fine-tuning the results. The computer especially uses intake air and exhaust oxygen to monitor if more/less fuel is required. A knock-sensor tells your motor to pull timing.
Because there's about a +/- leeway of 10-15%, you really have to be fairly close for it to run correctly.
MAF-controlled motors are typically more forgiving of changes without getting into programming. We say programming -- though it's more a matter of supplying number/parms for a "baseline".
When your ECM goes into "fault-mode", it is forced to use the baseline w/o much/any feedback. That's another reason things need to be close.











