MAD's Coupler?
IMHO what you have to lose is $40.
I have to admit I didn't do a 'before and after' dyno test so perhaps if you could get it to fit there may actually be a performance gain, but my impression of the product is that it is poor quality, is difficult to install, has serious potential for unreliability, might be worse performing than the stock accordion, and has no customer support whatsoever by the manufacturer. :cuss
On my car (and I'll bet on other C4s too) the center axis of the throttle body and the center axis of the MAF are not in line. In other words, the stock accordion hose makes a slight kink (a shallow, upside down U) to connect the two. Well, when you take the smooth, rigid coupler and try and make the same connection, the kink makes the lower wall of the coupler buckle upwards into the air path. I'd estimate that it reduces the cross sectional area of the coupler by at least 30% in this area, if not more. :nonod:
Also, the coupler is nothing more than a sheet of rubber cut into a party-hat style cone with the pointy end cut off, resulting in a big opening (throttle body end) and a little opening (MAF end) with a GLUED lengthwise seam.
The first one MAD shipped me had a horrible glue job so I had to send it back. The second one was acceptable but still not great. Included in the box from the manufacturer was a sheet of installation instruction (a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy......) that also included their name, phone number and address.
I called them to ask what sort of testing (if any) had been done on the glued seam to insure that it wouldn't come apart. Road racing has it's own set of problems like prolonged higher than normal temperatures and constant engine twist in the motor mounts which in turn is constantly yanking at the coupler.....not to mention the obvious normal heat, chemical resistance, ozone, and age concerns. The last thing I want is to suck dirt into the engine through a split in the coupler, or just as horrible, would be extra clean air that the MAF doesn't know about making the car run too lean (spelled H-O-T!!).
But I never got a chance to ask any of the questions because although I left several messages on the manufacturer's answering machine they never called me back.
Given my experience I'd say it was a piece of junk. Although the smooth sides have potential for increased flow, the 'kink' in the coupler on the underside after installation seems to make things worse than the stock setup, not better.
Btw, never being shy to modify something to make it better, I spent quite a bit of time trimming/mitering the TB end of the coupler to get rid of the kink.....but the geometry of the components and the stiffness of the coupler made it impossible. At that point I just pitched it as I didn't even want to try and return it to MAD (since I modified it).
This is just my opinion, your experience may be different.
:seeya
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Are there any other alternatives?
Tim89, don't bother with the Stage II chip. Your '89 only needs an AFPR to tune fuel to air at WOT. I installed a used ($50 on e-bay) Stage II and no diff. at the strip. Since I have an aux fan sw wired into my main fan relay it didn't even bring the fans on earlier. In fact I think the timing is a little too agressive as I can no longer run with base timing above the stock setting of +6deg without getting knock counts at WOT.











