When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I would really like to see what configs everyone is using with the HOT cam and dyno numbers. I have a friend who wants to do a build-up soon and is curious on the numbers that the HOT cam can push out. This includes anyone with the following that meets the following basic criteria...
1. LT1/4 motors only
2. 350 CI (no strokers please)
3. Dyno numbers, and it would be great if you knew the type of dyno it was run on ie; Mustang or Dynojet
Anything else is fair game...so if you could put down your config and number I would be grateful! Thanks in advance!
Jay
P.S. if it is easier you can e-mail me at Jay@Cline.net
Re: Question for everyone running the HOT cam (Glasman66)
Saw your sig Iride motocross too.
What do you think qabout your 4.10 gears? Was it a worth it. Should I do that befor a cam?
The 4.10's are great! One of the best things I did to the car without a doubt. 6th gear is actually useable now! IMHO I wouldn't do a cam without doing the heads with it. Changing a cam on an LT motor is a PITA. But if you have to do it in increments I would do this...
1. gears
2. cam
3. heads/headers
You can throw a cat-back exhaust system on at anytime.
Re: Question for everyone running the HOT cam (Zix)
HotCam in stock LT1 350 shortblock, ported LT1 heads and intake, 52mm TB, shorty headers (no gain from these), low impedence ignition coil (standard on '96 & up), Taylor Spiro Pro 10.4 mm ignition wires, LT1Edit computer recalibration. Run on a DynoJet, I don't have the printouts handy, but I seem to remember 300 lbs of torque minimum from ~ 2,000 rpm onward, it has dyno'd as high as 367 rwhp, figures in sig are from latest emmisions tune up - it actually passed emissions with readings that were even cleaner than when it was new and stock!
Only thing I would have done differently in retrospect is to machine the heads for something other than the LT4 valvesprings I am using. It is my current opinion that the non-hollow stem 2.00 x 1.60 valves I have are too heavy for the LT4 valvesprings (although I do run titanium retainers). What I would use instead would be a single spring + dampener combination - I think this alone would put me just over 370 rwhp.
Add a set of proper longtube headers and recalibrate the computer and I think it could make it past 380 rwhp.
Re: Question for everyone running the HOT cam (Zix)
Follow the links in the sig to the web page. I've got all my mods listed, along with dyno graphs from various stages. I've got a set of heads in the works as well, then I'll be aiming for 370+ hp.
Re: Question for everyone running the HOT cam (Zix)
Okay, I can read, honest. I'm not an LT1 But I had to chime in on this cam. It really, really is a good design. It has a very broad curve and works in everything from 90 L98s to LT4s. I also think the fast burn heads have the same kind of attributes.
You can get cams that will give you more torque or more HP, but the Hot Cam still is streetable and afforable.
Re: Question for everyone running the HOT cam (Skippy Stone)
Skippy, right you are that this is one of the best all around cams available, it does everything well. Did you know that flexibility was designed right into this cam - originally it was designed with road racing in mind, and the ability to pull strongly throughout the rev range. I don't know if this is still true, but a few years back as I was preparing to install my HotCam I did a source code search in the GM parts system (to find out who was supplying this cam to GM). The answer that I got was that this was an in house cam and that it was NOT sourced through Comp or Crane etc.
Re: Question for everyone running the HOT cam (The Green Rocket)
Skippy, right you are that this is one of the best all around cams available, it does everything well.....The answer that I got was that this was an in house cam and that it was NOT sourced through Comp or Crane etc.
Thomas
One of the best car aftermarket product I've ever owned. GM engineers are some of the most underrated in the world. There is a 50 year list of inovations from GM that everyone overlooks. If the Vette teams had been given half the go-aheads they asked the bean-counters for, we'd be driven mid-engine 11.0/200mph 1.4 g monsters! :p: