When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
84 CORVETTE L83. I am going to Jegs tonight to get my new torque converter, I was thinking while I was there I might pick up new rocker arms. I see a lot of people going to 1.6's. I think 1.6's might be too much for me as my cam is so big, specs of my cam are intake valve lift .500 exhaust .486, lobe lift .334. If my research is correct me going to 1.6 rocker arms would make this .540 exhaust and .526 intake. That seems really high and might cause problems maybe ?!??!? IDK. So should I go for 1.6's if it wont hurt anything or stay at my 1.5's.
Last edited by phucking-low; Jul 16, 2015 at 12:21 PM.
Depends on your valve springs, installed height. What are the specs on those?
If your lobe lift is .334, then .334 x 1.6 = .534" intake lift. which mostly jibes w/your stated total lift of .5"
If you can get the .534" out of the springs you have, and not float the valves, it would be a low budget way to gain a little power and tq. MOst who put 1.6 Rockers on CFI's speak favorably of the change. Typically that's on a stock cam though.
Cant remember what the part number was on my valve springs, there comp cams and when i bought the cam i asked for the correct matching valve springs, high energy push rods, and lifters.
Well, you could buy them, throw one intake and one exhaust on, then slowly hand turn the engine over and check for coil bind. If they don't work, return 'em.
When the spring is compressed to the point where the coils contact each other. It becomes solid and the results are obvious. There is a minimum spec for clearance between coils, this sources says .060" and that is probably to allow for a margin of safety for things like expansion.
You can install the two rockers, as I mentioned above, and measure between the coils w/a feeler gauge.