When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What computer module depends on what other in a '91
s far as I know I have the following computer modules but curious which one depends on what others.
ECM
CCM
C68
ABS
FX3
VATS seems to run through CCM unless missing something.
Looking to simplify things but without knowing what relies on what decisions are hard to make. With all 25 year old through hold circuit boards reliability is sort of a joke.
Actually, through-hole technology has always been far more reliable than surface mount technology. SMT is only used to save space and make the product cheaper to manufacture.
Actually, through-hole technology has always been far more reliable than surface mount technology. SMT is only used to save space and make the product cheaper to manufacture.
I have had much more trouble with thru hole in the after market auto electronics and zero with SMT. Vibration seems to shake the thru hole parts to failure in my experience. I always attributed to the distance from the part off the board and greater mass of the parts creating a longer lever arm to stress the solder joint.
From: Las Vegas - Just stop perpetuating myths please.
Not to sure what your are asking? Which module depends on another is a very broad question. Which ones communicate can be seen on the 1990-1991 engine wiring diagram and you can find one here: https://wiki.bentleypublishers.com/p...ageId=17989640.
Those modules will communicate w/serial data but not like the Ethernet packets, segments and frames. If want to intercept and interpret the serial data you can use some other application software like "Bit Shark" but i doubt you want to go there. What the logical diagrams (protocol/topology?) look like for each module you would have to ask general motors to provide them.
Now the software has been hacked as thats where all the tuner software came/comes from. But i imagine that would have to be your career specialty for enough expertise rather than a hobby. Best option is to use the diagnostic software from GM or aftermarket to find your problems.
I think your asking for something only the GM engineering department can provide.
Not to sure what your are asking? Which module depends on another is a very broad question. Which ones communicate can be seen on the 1990-1991 engine wiring diagram and you can find one here: https://wiki.bentleypublishers.com/p...ageId=17989640.
Those modules will communicate w/serial data but not like the Ethernet packets, segments and frames. If want to intercept and interpret the serial data you can use some other application software like "Bit Shark" but i doubt you want to go there. What the logical diagrams (protocol/topology?) look like for each module you would have to ask general motors to provide them.
Now the software has been hacked as thats where all the tuner software came/comes from. But i imagine that would have to be your career specialty for enough expertise rather than a hobby. Best option is to use the diagnostic software from GM or aftermarket to find your problems.
I think your asking for something only the GM engineering department can provide.
Thanks for the link very well organized diagram and for the record no real problems currently just curious how intertwined things were and how they depended on each other. From reading my impression is a great deal and hard to seprate one from another and even harder to dignose as the tools are quite vintage and long gone. I could not find a GM dealer that could scan the ABS in a 50 mile radius.
I have had much more trouble with thru hole in the after market auto electronics and zero with SMT. Vibration seems to shake the thru hole parts to failure in my experience. I always attributed to the distance from the part off the board and greater mass of the parts creating a longer lever arm to stress the solder joint.
<<<<< -- EE with over 40 years experience with the design of electronic assemblies and circuit boards for a major manufacturer of industrial control products. That included wire-to-wire, thru-hole, and SMT. I know the reliability factors, I was also the QA manager for 10 years. The problem you experienced are probably due to the "aftermarket" industry's lower standards.
<<<<< -- EE with over 40 years experience with the design of electronic assemblies and circuit boards for a major manufacturer of industrial control products. That included wire-to-wire, thru-hole, and SMT. I know the reliability factors, I was also the QA manager for 10 years. The problem you experienced are probably due to the "aftermarket" industry's lower standards.
No doubt the problem and defer to your experience of things done correctly. Unfortunately many times they are not. I had an ECM from one company years ago that first thing before shipping out was to hot glue caps to the board along with a few chips that were socketed. If not done a failure in 90 to 180 dats depending how much they raced.
The CCM won't work without a handshake from the ECM at ignition-on time. The ECM works alone but depends on the CCM for VATS information. But that might be bypassed or substituted to eliminate the CCM. The ABS uses signals from the CCM to determine vehicle speed, so it can compare that with the individual wheel speeds. I don't think the suspension control module needs anything from the others because it gets vehicle speed directly from the transmission sensor. I think the HVAC module needs vehicle speed from the CCM but I don't know what happens if it isn't present.
I have read and do not know if true that CCM holds the odometer reading. Does that mean it runs the speedometer?
The CCM does hold and retain the ODOMETER, the CCM also controls the entire LCD display in the cluster. Runs it? No I'd say but is responsible for the display and control. The VSS in '90+ cars first stop is the ECM with splices that directly go to SRCM - FX3 (if equipped), ECM data is sent simultaneously to the SCVC (radio), Cruise and CCM.
Does that make the ABS stand alone? If I understand the C68 and FX3 were options so can be safely deleted if needed. I have an after market radio that uses nothing from the original short of antenna so no issues there. Vats can be bypasses with programing and wiring changes.
It would seem the only way to get to ECM only and lose the CCM is to have a speedometer and fuel gauge solution along with vats programing or aftermarket ECM that has no VATS.
You can do VATs delete logic on the ECM (within the MEMCAL). That should suffice the ECM to start. I do know that the 91-90 EBCM (ABS ECM) is the same, I also know that the 89-90 ABS harness is the same (1991 changed due to front sensor redesign).
I can say that a 1991 ECM and 1991 CCM will work without the ABS Serial connection. When I converted my 89 to a 1991 dash, I used a 1991 CCM to get the cluster display to work correctly, but I left the 1989 EBCM in the car, without issues or code or anything being displayed and the ABS worked as designed.
Did you have C68 or was that not available in you car? If so did that work ok?
I would think a simple PIC or other computer could easily drive the LCD and Vats delete solves that. ABS seems like stand alone as does FX3 and C68.
My plan here digging through this is the fatal day the CCM goes belly up. They are rare expensive and require programming with tools long since packed away at dealers. I asked my local dealer about checking the ABS and cycling it for me and the reply was that stuff was packed away ages ago and there are few that even remember how to use it.
I had C68.. it worked fine. I am not sure if the CCM does anything with the HVAC. my 1990 ZR-1 has C60, so I too expect that if the CCM goes belly up I could go to aftermarket gauges and call it good