Is it stock?
The reason I have begun wondering is that a friend also has a '96 CE LT4 and when on cruise control at 60 mph on flat road his runs about 30 mpg and mine runs about 28 mpg.
I also think mine runs stronger. Today I was playing and tried out an old accelerometer device (similar to a g-tech) and was surprised at the results. I got mostly 12.8's at 115 to 117 mph (on a closed road of course
). In the past my accelerometer has been pretty close to some cars I ran at the track, but I haven't done that in a while and not really sure how accurate it is, but I like those numbers and hope they are not too optimistic.I thought the car was stock, but some things don't add up to me, like even though it idles smoothly, it pulls more than expected with slightly worse mileage.
I may break down and take a valve cover off and use a dial indicator for measuring the valve lift, but I am lazy and don't really want to do that while the car is running good. And even then I might be able to confirm a different cam, but still wouldn't know which one.
Other than taking the engine apart, is there any good way to tell what cam is in it? I can't think of a way to tell for sure.
Anyone with an LT4 (with or without mods) have any comparison 1/4 miles or mpg, especially if before and after mods.
Sorry for the rambling, but just some idle thoughts and curiosity.
12.8/117 is pretty strong. The trap tells the story, although those devices that you used show a slightly higher trap than you'd see at a drag track. Figure 114-115 at a real track? That's LS2 territory.
The reason I have begun wondering is that a friend also has a '96 CE LT4 and when on cruise control at 60 mph on flat road his runs about 30 mpg and mine runs about 28 mpg.
I also think mine runs stronger. Today I was playing and tried out an old accelerometer device (similar to a g-tech) and was surprised at the results. I got mostly 12.8's at 115 to 117 mph (on a closed road of course
). In the past my accelerometer has been pretty close to some cars I ran at the track, but I haven't done that in a while and not really sure how accurate it is, but I like those numbers and hope they are not too optimistic.I thought the car was stock, but some things don't add up to me, like even though it idles smoothly, it pulls more than expected with slightly worse mileage.
I may break down and take a valve cover off and use a dial indicator for measuring the valve lift, but I am lazy and don't really want to do that while the car is running good. And even then I might be able to confirm a different cam, but still wouldn't know which one.
Other than taking the engine apart, is there any good way to tell what cam is in it? I can't think of a way to tell for sure.
Anyone with an LT4 (with or without mods) have any comparison 1/4 miles or mpg, especially if before and after mods.
Sorry for the rambling, but just some idle thoughts and curiosity.
What rear gears do you have?
12.8/117 is pretty strong. The trap tells the story, although those devices that you used show a slightly higher trap than you'd see at a drag track. Figure 114-115 at a real track? That's LS2 territory.
I probably won't go to a dyno, but I may have to take it to a track (that is a lot more fun too).
Although seat of the pants is not accurate, I have a C5 with a slightly modded LS1 (Vararam, FAST, LG longtubes, tune) that should be about even with an LS2 and my '96 feels every bit as strong. Feel can deceiving, but it is a fun car to drive.
Seat of the pants is another reason I think it might have a different cam. I keep hearing that an LT4 and an LT1 run the same until higher rpm where an LT4 runs harder. Unless I am racing I usually only go up to about 5k. However, my '96 LT4 runs harder than my '95 LT1 6M from low rpm up to about 5k rpm too.
I have the stock 3.45 ratio.
I didn't get any info from the previous owner, but like you, I am not wanting to take it apart while it is running good.
Last edited by QCVette; Sep 14, 2016 at 08:53 AM.
That is the truth. When I first got my LT1 running and still had my C6....I mean, the C4 was as fast as the C6. IT WAS. SOTP. In reality, the C6 was a solid 1 second and 10 mph faster at the drag track.
That is the truth. When I first got my LT1 running and still had my C6....I mean, the C4 was as fast as the C6. IT WAS. SOTP. In reality, the C6 was a solid 1 second and 10 mph faster at the drag track.I think I really need to just go to the track and see what I get. I would like to believe the numbers I got, but I am skeptical. They seem too good.
I have done a few searches for LT4 1/4 miles with and without mods, and I see so much variation that I don't know what to believe. My best guess from the searches is for a stock LT4 to be running low to mid 13's and then it becomes more confusing on how much better with mods since so many have multiple mods and the mods are frequently different.
From the searches I am guessing a stock LT4 with a cam like the hotcam might be high 12's to low 13's. I would like to hear from people with a first hand experience what the before and after times were when doing a mild cam on an LT1 or LT4.





First time I heard a hotcam, the bubba-la-bubba-la made me wish I'd opted for more exhaust duration on my custom grind. A hotcam doesn't SOUND like a stock cam.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
It sounds like a fun day at the track. The compensated time/speed of 12.959/114 is pretty good too. What I could find in searches there seem to be a lot of LT4's with a hotcam in the high 12's, so your car matches that pretty close.












