C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

C R vs octane rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2017 | 02:26 PM
  #1  
spide's Avatar
spide
Thread Starter
1st Gear
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default C R vs octane rating

do you not go by your static CR when choosing an octane rated gas ? i thought dynamic was just cranking comp ...static is when the cam is in effect so it just seems to reason that static is the one to go by when choosing the gas you use ... am i right ?
Reply
Old May 29, 2017 | 06:02 PM
  #2  
QCVette's Avatar
QCVette
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Active Streak: 90 Days
Liked
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,528
Likes: 752
From: South Dakota
Default

If I understand it correctly, static is simply the volume of the cylinder/chamber when the piston is all the way down divided by the volume of the cylinder/chamber when the piston is all the way up.

The dynamic ratio brings in other variables. It is the volume of fuel/air mixture that is brought into the cylinder/chamber divided by the static volume when the piston is all the way up. This takes into account how efficient the cam/intake/head design/etc is in filling, and how efficient the cam/head design/exhaust/etc is in emptying. So things like cam overlap and timing can play a big role in how much effective cylinder pressure the engine has.

Of the two, the dynamic is a better indicator of compression pressure in actual performance and a better indicator of octane needs.

However, that is not the only determination of octane needs. Cylinder pressure is one thing, but others include how cool the engine is running, how much heat transfer out of the cylinder (example of aluminum heads vs cast iron), how much turbulence there is in the chamber, and other things that might create a hot spot such as a hot spark plug or even carbon deposits or a sharp edge in the chamber.

Dynamic compression can be more difficult to measure accurately and it will vary with rpm, so it is quite difficult to quantify with normal methods.

Static compression is simply a measurement calculation from the engine parts used, so it is easy to determine and it can give a general idea that higher compression needs higher octane, but it is not a fixed ratio from static compression ratio to octane needed. For example some of my 1960's and 1970's motors would knock at 10:1, while some newer motors don't knock at 11:1 ratios.

It still comes down to whether it has preignition or not. Sometimes you can hear it, or you can check whether the knock sensors are detecting it.

My $0.02

Good luck.

Last edited by QCVette; May 30, 2017 at 08:35 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply
Old May 30, 2017 | 11:17 AM
  #3  
vader86's Avatar
vader86
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 62,154
Likes: 1,731
From: Athens AL
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Default

There is more to it as stated above, but I typically choose octane by the static CR until I learn otherwise. Dynamic is harder to figure out.

Really the best thing is to hook up the laptop DataMaster and check for knock counts, and go with the lowest octane possible.
Reply
Old May 30, 2017 | 02:18 PM
  #4  
DGXR's Avatar
DGXR
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 349
From: Sacramento California
Default

It's important to remember that in a NA engine, the cylinder will never be 100% full of air/fuel mix due to various air restrictions (TB plate, air filter, etc). So the static compression ratio is not very useful in the real world, it only provides a baseline (or potential).

The correct fuel octane depends on so many things: operating temperature, fuel stoichiometry (rich/lean mix at different loads and RPMs), compression ratio, spark management system, etc. A dyno will be helpful in determining the best octane for any given setup. Good luck.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To C R vs octane rating





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE