When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Title says it, tuning software options for Mac OS? I know I can run MS parallels on Mac, but would prefer to find Mac OS options instead. I just cant justify buying even a cheap MS laptop just for tuning.
For what year Corvette? For 96 I know there is nothing available - the only option is Jet DST, which really only runs on Windows XP or newer Windows with compatibility mode. For 94-95, I doubt there's anything new, and I've never heard of anything for Macs. This is a pretty good tutorial, and it doesn't include anything about Macs apps: http://www.lt1pcmtuning.com/tips/.
Last edited by MatthewMiller; Oct 30, 2017 at 07:55 PM.
It is for an 89 z51 L98 vehicle. I knew parallels would be the easiest option but wanted to pick brains before I went down that route. Might even try to find a refurb surface or something. I won't be doing any self tuning since I don't have all of the emulator software and chip burning software. But wanted to be able to see the live data from the ECM as the engine runs. I appreciate the feedback!
It is for an 89 z51 L98 vehicle. I knew parallels would be the easiest option but wanted to pick brains before I went down that route. Might even try to find a refurb surface or something. I won't be doing any self tuning since I don't have all of the emulator software and chip burning software. But wanted to be able to see the live data from the ECM as the engine runs. I appreciate the feedback!
Oh, okay. So you don't need tuning software, just datalogging. There might be something for that for Macs - I don't know.
You should be able to find a used laptop with the correct ports for very low dollars ... otherwise just run a windows emulator on your Mac and just call it done.
When I mentioned very, very, very inexpensive I had in mind likely a friend/acquaintance that's got one gathering dust. Newer isn't something that's necessarily a plus in your case and actually could be considered maybe a handicap.
When I mentioned very, very, very inexpensive I had in mind likely a friend/acquaintance that's got one gathering dust. Newer isn't something that's necessarily a plus in your case and actually could be considered maybe a handicap.
Agreed. As with the Jet software for OBD2 cars, my guess is that anything you find will be a lot happier running on Windows XP than on any newer OSs. It's also hard to imagine anyone taking the time to write code for a data logger for Macs, especially 15-20 years ago, since there just weren't that many out there.
Agreed. As with the Jet software for OBD2 cars, my guess is that anything you find will be a lot happier running on Windows XP than on any newer OSs. It's also hard to imagine anyone taking the time to write code for a data logger for Macs, especially 15-20 years ago, since there just weren't that many out there.
Agreed and agreed. I appreciate the feedback. I just want to see the live data to find out if any sensors are throwing bad data. I have a feeling the O2 sensor is throwing bad data, but not enough to throw a code. Getting a rough idle in closed loop, with just a very very slight rich exhaust. The car has an unknown aftermarket cam in it, but stock aluminum 1989 heads and running a stock ECM PROM chip. Obviously it needs to be tuned, but i'm just taking care of the little tick tack items before I spend money on a tuning session.
The real question I have to decide on is whether or not to delete the EGR system. The exhaust manifolds have cracked at the downpipe flanges, so its an excuse to buy headers and a new exhaust system AIR is already deleted on the car but the EGR remains. I know the benefits of EGR, but if I can get headers without the EGR fitting, that would be aesthetic...
It could be the O2 sensor, or it may just be that in open-loop the computer isn't calibrated tuned properly (unless it previously ran well on this same setup). On L98 motors, I don't know how prone it is to throw a code with a bad O2 sensor.
Re the EGR, fwiw, with an aftermarket cam that has a little more overlap than stock the engine is probably making its own EGR just due to overlap. As a reference, in 96 the LT1 came with EGR but the LT4 didn't have any EGR from the factory, because its cam had enough extra overlap to make it unnecessary. So that is to say you probably don't even need it to keep your NOx within limits (if that is a requirement for you).
Re the EGR, fwiw, with an aftermarket cam that has a little more overlap than stock the engine is probably making its own EGR just due to overlap. As a reference, in 96 the LT1 came with EGR but the LT4 didn't have any EGR from the factory, because its cam had enough extra overlap to make it unnecessary. So that is to say you probably don't even need it to keep your NOx within limits (if that is a requirement for you).
Thats been my thought too man. I'm going to have to hit up the PO again and see if they can track down the rebuild and cam specs. All he kept saying was that it was "one degree larger than stock". The only interpretation of that I can come up with is that maybe it is one degree tighter on the LSA. It does have a nice mild cam chop, nothing like a 110 LSA or anything. Those original aluminum heads can only take so much valve travel and I have a feeling its pretty close to stock lift. Something tells me the PO wouldn't have paid for new length lifter rods. I'm in NC, I know the right inspection spots to go to so I can "pass" inspection...But a nice tune without the EGR would have no problem passing anyway