C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

ISO schematic - alarm/chime module

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2018 | 06:00 PM
  #1  
Joe C's Avatar
Joe C
Thread Starter
Race Director
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 763
Default ISO schematic - alarm/chime module

anyone have a circuit schematic for the C4 chime or alarm, (seat belt, ignition key, head lights) module, PN 10037040?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2018 | 08:03 PM
  #2  
pcolt94's Avatar
pcolt94
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,620
Likes: 206
From: Orlando FL
Default

No schematic.
I did fix my chime box. I did troubleshoot it and found nothing wrong electrically all signals were all there and working but no sound or chime. I found the two large supports on either side of the chime horn had bad connections. Did not look bad but re-soldered it with good heat (since the metal is heavy) and after that it worked.
This is the heaviest weight on the board and sure time and vibration caused cracks in solder.
I soldered the lands for the input for the horn also.

I could not figure why this fixed it. It was strange with doing electronics all my life. It just looked like a support. Did not make sense but you can't argue with success. Did it in 2004, still working fine.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 09:54 AM
  #3  
Joe C's Avatar
Joe C
Thread Starter
Race Director
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 763
Default

Originally Posted by pcolt94
No schematic.
I did fix my chime box. I did troubleshoot it and found nothing wrong electrically all signals were all there and working but no sound or chime. I found the two large supports on either side of the chime horn had bad connections. Did not look bad but re-soldered it with good heat (since the metal is heavy) and after that it worked.
This is the heaviest weight on the board and sure time and vibration caused cracks in solder.
I soldered the lands for the input for the horn also.

I could not figure why this fixed it. It was strange with doing electronics all my life. It just looked like a support. Did not make sense but you can't argue with success. Did it in 2004, still working fine.
, and thanks....
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2018 | 12:35 PM
  #4  
belairbrian's Avatar
belairbrian
Melting Slicks
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 363
From: Central Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by pcolt94

I could not figure why this fixed it. It was strange with doing electronics all my life. It just looked like a support. Did not make sense but you can't argue with success. Did it in 2004, still working fine.


Sounds like the supports were acting as part of the circuit, maybe ground for the buzzer.


Just curious, did you go into the dash just to fix the buzzer, or were you already in there for some other reason?


At least on my 92 it's a lot of work to get there. My works when it feels like it, but I can't see disassembling the dash to get at it.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2018 | 09:59 PM
  #5  
pcolt94's Avatar
pcolt94
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,620
Likes: 206
From: Orlando FL
Default

Originally Posted by belairbrian
Sounds like the supports were acting as part of the circuit, maybe ground for the buzzer.


Just curious, did you go into the dash just to fix the buzzer, or were you already in there for some other reason?


At least on my 92 it's a lot of work to get there. My works when it feels like it, but I can't see disassembling the dash to get at it.
It was probably within the first year of buying the car where I had a list of items to fix after I did a tune up and the general maintenance and fluids. I was into the dash for the PKE and had to remove the chime unit to get to the PKE. Thought I would give the chime unit a go at it since it was out already.

I agree it could have been a ground for the chime horn but it is driven like you would drive a speaker. I did not see how the ground should affect the operation of it. But I did not have a schematic or a specific knowledge of theory of operation. I was my last thought like what the heck it's a shot in the dark and was surprised when it worked 100% as it was intermittent.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 05:29 AM
  #6  
Joe C's Avatar
Joe C
Thread Starter
Race Director
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 763
Default

Originally Posted by pcolt94
It was probably within the first year of buying the car where I had a list of items to fix after I did a tune up and the general maintenance and fluids. I was into the dash for the PKE and had to remove the chime unit to get to the PKE. Thought I would give the chime unit a go at it since it was out already.

I agree it could have been a ground for the chime horn but it is driven like you would drive a speaker. I did not see how the ground should affect the operation of it. But I did not have a schematic or a specific knowledge of theory of operation. I was my last thought like what the heck it's a shot in the dark and was surprised when it worked 100% as it was intermittent.
, more than likely, it's an electrical connection. nothing exotic on the circuit card - mostly standard components. there is a 16 pin DIP, but trying to ID the thing is problematic since it's buried under the sound module (which is nothing more than a speaker). the IC, most likely is a timing circuit and/or oscillator. as I said, nothing exotic - individual component failure, IMO, is pretty low. still would be nice to have a schematic for trouble shooting purposes - even a pinout would be helpful. I guess one could reverse engineer a schematic, but for me, i'm just not that ambitious.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 07:48 AM
  #7  
WVZR-1's Avatar
WVZR-1
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,375
Likes: 2,734
Default

For the 10037040 with it's use in so many GM applications I doubt it would require much of an effort to gather a 'handful' for dissection. The 10037040 doesn't appear to be OE for an '85 so unless you actually have the 10037040 in your '85 you might be interested in looking further.

Also for Internet searches and maybe circuit information if you used 10037041 which is the 'inked' assembly ID on the case you could maybe do better. Anyone who disassembled one who was interested might reference it to that information.

If you've removed one from the case was their any information actually on the board? You might inquire some of that.

I was surprised that Cliff Harris didn't have one or Rob Healey maybe. I checked Cliff's 'mrpeachy' and didn't see anything. Maybe reach out directly to Cliff.

If you've removed from the case - how similar to this is yours?

https://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/t...-board.143710/

Last edited by WVZR-1; Apr 14, 2018 at 08:12 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 08:41 AM
  #8  
Joe C's Avatar
Joe C
Thread Starter
Race Director
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 763
Default

Originally Posted by WVZR-1
For the 10037040 with it's use in so many GM applications I doubt it would require much of an effort to gather a 'handful' for dissection. The 10037040 doesn't appear to be OE for an '85 so unless you actually have the 10037040 in your '85 you might be interested in looking further.

Also for Internet searches and maybe circuit information if you used 10037041 which is the 'inked' assembly ID on the case you could maybe do better. Anyone who disassembled one who was interested might reference it to that information.

If you've removed one from the case was their any information actually on the board?
correct, the actual part number in my 85 was 10037041. they look identical except for the PN inking. I have several 10037040, and just "assumed" my original was the 040 part. anyway, replaced my original with a NOS 040 part, and everything seems to be working as normal. I did internet searches for "schematic (both PN's) and came up with nothing. I've removed the circuit card from the case, and other than a few components ID's, no other identification. if there is a difference between the 040 and 041 parts, I doubt it's an operational difference. one note, the circuit does have a couple electrolytic caps, and those do have a limited life span. might try replacing those and follow pcolt94's advice and check solder connections. most likely it will go on the back burner since everything's back to normal with the NOS-040 part.

BTW, the module in your attached link looks nothing like my 041 part. 84's must have a different part number altogether - ??? finally, as far as an 85 goes, it looks like both 040 and 041 parts are alternate and interchangeable. seems the 041 part is called out for the 85-89 model years.

edit: now this is getting confusing - i'll have to verify this, but it looks like the 040 part has a 8-pin connector where as the 041 is a 7 pin connector. same basic layout, but an extra pin. I never notice the difference. it was still a direct plug in, so i'm guessing the 040 part has an extra circuit or feature. I have a second NOS 040 part, and i'll have to pull it for a "apples to apples" comparison.

in any event, NEW correct alarm modules for the 85-89 corvette, PN 10037041, are almost non-existent. it seems that the more common 040 module, used across various other GM lines is more readily available and can be purchased without the corvette tax. as far as I can tell, there's no operational difference. i'll dig deeper into the 040/041 difference and post back....

Last edited by Joe C; Apr 14, 2018 at 09:24 AM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-6

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 08:52 AM
  #9  
WVZR-1's Avatar
WVZR-1
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,375
Likes: 2,734
Default

Originally Posted by Joe C
correct, the actual part number in my 85 was 10037041. I have several 10037040, and just "assumed" my original was the 040 part. anyway, replaced my original with a NOS 040 part, and everything seems to be working as normal.

Working - GOOD!!

So it appears your '85 had been replaced 'once' already before your purchase. An '85 I would have expected to have had a 14062570 if still original.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 09:25 AM
  #10  
belairbrian's Avatar
belairbrian
Melting Slicks
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 363
From: Central Alabama
Default

The picture does have some clues. It shows being made by Lectron. They were in Rochester Hills MI. From what I could find they were bought by Eaton in 94. So if the drawing exists it's probably in their archives somewhere. Doubt they would put much effort into finding it for anyone.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 09:39 AM
  #11  
Joe C's Avatar
Joe C
Thread Starter
Race Director
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 763
Default

Originally Posted by WVZR-1
Working - GOOD!!

So it appears your '85 had been replaced 'once' already before your purchase. An '85 I would have expected to have had a 14062570 if still original.
if it was replaced, it was before I bought the car in 1995. the date code on the module i pulled was (Julian date) 5 177, or june 26th of 85. that would coincide with my july 85 build.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 09:56 AM
  #12  
Joe C's Avatar
Joe C
Thread Starter
Race Director
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 763
Default

Originally Posted by belairbrian
The picture does have some clues. It shows being made by Lectron. They were in Rochester Hills MI. From what I could find they were bought by Eaton in 94. So if the drawing exists it's probably in their archives somewhere. Doubt they would put much effort into finding it for anyone.
- there are several lectron patent numbers on the case - that might be a clue.

more info - a google search on one of the pat.nos. yielded this - Driver circuit for tone generator - https://patents.google.com/patent/US4183278. information is somewhat vague, but none the less, still another piece to the puzzle.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2018 | 04:07 PM
  #13  
pcolt94's Avatar
pcolt94
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,620
Likes: 206
From: Orlando FL
Default

Originally Posted by WVZR-1
If you've removed from the case - how similar to this is yours?

https://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/t...-board.143710/
94 car
I guess that is the earlier module as from what I remember mine looked totally different as far as the actual chime unit. Mine stood tall on the board like a cone tower (like upside down ice cream cone). Then on either side of the top were 2 supports (flat metal) that went down to the edge of the board at a 45* angle. Obviously different than what was being worked on and information for it. Memory from 10+ years ago.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To ISO schematic - alarm/chime module





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-1
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-2
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-4
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE