OptiSpark Question
a great car when I eventually get around to purchasing a C4
In short, I would not let opti fears dissuade you from buying a C4 with a vastly superior LT engine.
Let me just say up front, I am not a mechanic. I have replaced three Optisparks so far on two LT-1 Corvettes so it's just my opinion after a measly 3 years of ownership.
What do you plan to do with the car? If it will be a garage queen or a track car, you're good. A daily driver or long distance trip car might be different.
How are your mechanical skills? Or how deep are your pockets to pay a mechanic? A good mechanic with the right tools can swap it in 2 hours. My first took 2 months. All because of the Harmonic Balancer that has to come out.
Once you've done the swap and slathered anti-seize all over the HB mount, future swaps are relatively painless. My second time took less than a day.
The Optispark can and will leave you stranded. Often with little or no warning. My '96 has been towed home three times. Not a question of IF, simply a question of WHEN.
Do you feel lucky?
Then there's the bad news. GM no longer makes the Optispark. Mitsubishi no longer makes the coveted optical sensor. Cheap Chinese junk abounds.
There's the fellow who conferred a doctorate degree upon himself for rebuilding Optisparks. He will show you a video of it working on his bench before shipping. Well, they all work right up to the point where they no longer do so meh.
Every one of them is a crapshoot. The one I'm running now is made by AIP (Bakersfield) and it can be bought with a 90 day warranty on Amazon for $99 or a 2 year warranty at Sac City for $160.
My previous now dead Optispark lasted about 16 months (on a one year warranty) and came highly recommended from Petris Enterprises for $350.
Some folks put the Mitsubishi sensor from their original Opti into a Chinese model. Others swap cap and rotor and cross their fingers.
That's my lousy 2 cents on the topic. Long trips in my vette are virtually non-existent as my butt puckers just thinking about the inevitable fail to come.
Happy hunting!
Last edited by Renfield; Oct 27, 2018 at 01:02 PM.
I understand that the Optispark is used on the same engine in other GM vehicles, do they have the same issues or is it more prevalent in the Corvette?
I understand that the Optispark is used on the same engine in other GM vehicles, do they have the same issues or is it more prevalent in the Corvette?
A sticky would be nice. But If there are folks running the LT-1 without issue, they have had all the opportunity in the world to chime in. It is a distributor, so it has a limited lifespan and the replacements are (all together now) a crapshoot.
Do some folks misdiagnose the issue? Without a doubt. I'm sure many Optispark have been replaced when the coil or ICM were the real culprit. But the bottom line is they will fail at some point, they give subtle or no warning, and you have shizzle for replacement options.
If I'm ever in the C4 market again, I would look for a '91. And it would probably have a whole new pile of issues. So I'm watching the C6 prices drop...




At 70K I had the entire ignition system replaced with new parts (including MSD opti & coil) when I had the LT4 hot cam kit, long tube headers and some other items installed.
The car now has 135K on it and no opti issues.
For someone like the Original Poster .... if you are considering buying a C4 for the first time I would strongly encourage you to invest $20.00 and buy yourself a copy of Mike Antonick's Corvette Black Book and go through the pages for 1984 - 1996. It makes it real easy to see what options were available with each year, what improvements were made to the car each year and.... what optional equipment became standard equipment in later years.
Last edited by Mr. Peabody; Oct 27, 2018 at 06:23 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
a great car when I eventually get around to purchasing a C4
Again as long as your opti spark opticAl sensor is mitsubishi- no problem, the optispark becomes a non issue.
One caveat: the 92-94 optispark needs a custom vent added to make it reliable (like the 95-96 units). Once added, the oem unit becomes entirely reliable
Last edited by dizwiz24; Oct 27, 2018 at 10:38 PM.
Let me just say up front, I am not a mechanic. I have replaced three Optisparks so far on two LT-1 Corvettes so it's just my opinion after a measly 3 years of ownership.
What do you plan to do with the car? If it will be a garage queen or a track car, you're good. A daily driver or long distance trip car might be different.
How are your mechanical skills? Or how deep are your pockets to pay a mechanic? A good mechanic with the right tools can swap it in 2 hours. My first took 2 months. All because of the Harmonic Balancer that has to come out.
Once you've done the swap and slathered anti-seize all over the HB mount, future swaps are relatively painless. My second time took less than a day.
The Optispark can and will leave you stranded. Often with little or no warning. My '96 has been towed home three times. Not a question of IF, simply a question of WHEN.
Do you feel lucky?
Then there's the bad news. GM no longer makes the Optispark. Mitsubishi no longer makes the coveted optical sensor. Cheap Chinese junk abounds.
There's the fellow who conferred a doctorate degree upon himself for rebuilding Optisparks. He will show you a video of it working on his bench before shipping. Well, they all work right up to the point where they no longer do so meh.
Every one of them is a crapshoot. The one I'm running now is made by AIP (Bakersfield) and it can be bought with a 90 day warranty on Amazon for $99 or a 2 year warranty at Sac City for $160.
My previous now dead Optispark lasted about 16 months (on a one year warranty) and came highly recommended from Petris Enterprises for $350.
Some folks put the Mitsubishi sensor from their original Opti into a Chinese model. Others swap cap and rotor and cross their fingers.
That's my lousy 2 cents on the topic. Long trips in my vette are virtually non-existent as my butt puckers just thinking about the inevitable fail to come.
Happy hunting!
Sure, you put chinese junk in, without the mitsubishi optical sensor, and its like you say - who knows when.
i have 100 % confidence in my oem vented optispark with mitsubishi optical sensor.
My stock OEM optispark lasted 26000 miles - but it did not causing a stranding, rather a stuttering under load.
inside it was all rust.
The seals had shrunk/cracked due to excessive heat allowing water into distributor- prob from prev owner washing engine.
on the 93, there is no vent. Had their been a vent, water would have been sucked out.
so 2 problems.
1. Excessive heat - which is never good for rubber seals or electronics
so i reprogrammed fans and added 160 tstat.
my coolant temp is 174 f vs 215 f .
2. Lack of a vent. This was added in 95/96 models and can be retrofitted
a great car when I eventually get around to purchasing a C4
The problem with the optispark is that the location makes maintenance difficult, and if you're paying someone else to do the work, expensive. So most people choose to skip the maintenance and drive it until it fails.
Given how much more likely the opti is to get wet than a traditional distributor, it's arguably way more reliable than those are.
I don't think the optispark was the most brilliant engineering decision, but "the majority of everybody who owns/has owned an LT1/LT4 corvette hates it with a passion" is just silly.
The vast majority of car owners aren't on internet forums, and those who are rarely start threads to describe how their car isn't broken. Complaints are amplified.
In the case of my '96, I did my research and bought a Petris because they've been making and selling Optispark replacements for seven years longer than yours and whalemans beloved optidoc. That failed in 16 months at the bearing, NOT the sensor. So much for the mitsubishi miracle meme.
On the '95 I went with AIP. It's still going strong for the new owner.
I am thrilled that your experience has not mirrored mine. But your experience does NOT negate mine. You just won your spin at the crap table. For now.
The sheer volume of rants about the optispark are not baseless. They permeate every LT-1 forum for a reason. Where there's smoke, you'll find fire.
I don't like to drive my '96 farther than AAA can tow it. Not if, but WHEN.
In the case of my '96, I did my research and bought a Petris because they've been making and selling Optispark replacements for seven years longer than yours and whalemans beloved optidoc. That failed in 16 months at the bearing, NOT the sensor. So much for the mitsubishi miracle meme.
On the '95 I went with AIP. It's still going strong for the new owner.
I am thrilled that your experience has not mirrored mine. But your experience does NOT negate mine. You just won your spin at the crap table. For now.
The sheer volume of rants about the optispark are not baseless. They permeate every LT-1 forum for a reason. Where there's smoke, you'll find fire.
I don't like to drive my '96 farther than AAA can tow it. Not if, but WHEN.
Did the previous owner (stupidly) replace a working fine oem optispark with a non oem unit - thinking they were doing proactive maintenance? We have seen this happen.
did the vent system work ?
Have you done anything to lower coolant temps? I believe this will help it live longer (though that might mess wirh emissions if you hve to get it checked).
Ive got so many mods done to mine i do actually agree - dont (regulrly) drive farther then AAA (plus) will tow it !
in 18 yrs of c4 lt1 ownership, I cannot disagree more with this post.
Sure, you put chinese junk in, without the mitsubishi optical sensor, and its like you say - who knows when.
i have 100 % confidence in my oem vented optispark with mitsubishi optical sensor.
My stock OEM optispark lasted 26000 miles - but it did not causing a stranding, rather a stuttering under load.
inside it was all rust.
The seals had shrunk/cracked due to excessive heat allowing water into distributor- prob from prev owner washing engine.
on the 93, there is no vent. Had their been a vent, water would have been sucked out.
so 2 problems.
1. Excessive heat - which is never good for rubber seals or electronics
so i reprogrammed fans and added 160 tstat.
my coolant temp is 174 f vs 215 f .
2. Lack of a vent. This was added in 95/96 models and can be retrofitted
When you bought the car was the optispark on it oem?
Did the previous owner (stupidly) replace a working fine oem optispark with a non oem unit - thinking they were doing proactive maintenance? We have seen this happen.
did the vent system work ?
Have you done anything to lower coolant temps? I believe this will help it live longer (though that might mess wirh emissions if you hve to get it checked).
Ive got so many mods done to mine i do actually agree - dont (regulrly) drive farther then AAA (plus) will tow it !
My Optispark ordeal has been well documented, photographed and videotaped. There's no magic bullet here. Pretty sure you'll find a design flaw with every generation Corvette from what I've read. Warped heads on the wimpy L98. Harmonic balancers and electronics on the C5. Even the C7s have problems. The list is long and stupid. In this case, replacement options just aren't good. With or without the mitsubishi sensor.
I am all in with Park City Tom on this issue. Buy the cheapest with the best warranty. And keep your AAA card handy.
Not IF, but WHEN.


Last edited by Warren Seale; Oct 30, 2018 at 08:51 AM.
The problem with the optispark is that the location makes maintenance difficult, and if you're paying someone else to do the work, expensive. So most people choose to skip the maintenance and drive it until it fails.
Given how much more likely the opti is to get wet than a traditional distributor, it's arguably way more reliable than those are.
I don't think the optispark was the most brilliant engineering decision, but "the majority of everybody who owns/has owned an LT1/LT4 corvette hates it with a passion" is just silly.
The vast majority of car owners aren't on internet forums, and those who are rarely start threads to describe how their car isn't broken. Complaints are amplified.
x 100
















