C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

FHA spring question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2018 | 11:00 PM
  #1  
jefnvk's Avatar
jefnvk
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 1,024
From: AA/Metro Detroit
Default FHA spring question

I was looking at my springs tonite, and I noticed that my front is marked FHA, which various tables around here indicate is a 93.1 spring rate. It is supposed to be an RPO FE1, is a 1992, I was not expecting to see that. I was examining this because I was interested in possibly taking it up to the Z51 specs springs, and this is what I was going to buy anyhow. I was told it was stock in this regard, and it definitely has the stock shocks, were these actually built with FHA up front? It is also marked with 1-5 under FHA, is this some sort of date code, or is there any other way to tell if this is a replacement?

The rear is the expected NYR 39.9, I just find it odd the front would be swapped and not the rear.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 10:16 AM
  #2  
VenkmanP's Avatar
VenkmanP
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,793
Likes: 9
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by jefnvk
I was looking at my springs tonite, and I noticed that my front is marked FHA, which various tables around here indicate is a 93.1 spring rate. It is supposed to be an RPO FE1, is a 1992, I was not expecting to see that. I was examining this because I was interested in possibly taking it up to the Z51 specs springs, and this is what I was going to buy anyhow. I was told it was stock in this regard, and it definitely has the stock shocks, were these actually built with FHA up front? It is also marked with 1-5 under FHA, is this some sort of date code, or is there any other way to tell if this is a replacement?

The rear is the expected NYR 39.9, I just find it odd the front would be swapped and not the rear.
When I swapped springs in my car (to softer) I discovered that I had a front spring that wasn't used on any 94's or any verts according to the parts fiche.

Like you, I found it odd that a DPO would change the front and not the rear. Maybe just careless documentation by GM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 01:47 PM
  #3  
Kevova's Avatar
Kevova
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,192
Likes: 750
From: near the thumb in the mitten
Default

Original front spring failed and the FHA was available. PO didn't like how car cornered. It's hard to say. FHA is rated the same as the Z07 although not the same code. The Z07 / Z51 rear spring NYU would complement the FHA
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 02:23 PM
  #4  
WVZR-1's Avatar
WVZR-1
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,388
Likes: 2,741
Default

I don't believe the FHA is an unusual find in most any year C4. In the past I've had FHA removed from a '91 and also an FHA removed from a '93. These were known to be from a '91 and a '93. There's very different fabrication used on the ends of the spring. If you check closely there's I believe an 1 1/4 X 1 1/4 pedestal on the control arm end of your spring. Through '91 there was only a molded pad on the control arm end. If you search eBay for FHA spring you'll find snapshots and images of both fabrications. Way to much is 'assumed' using these suspension charts etc on the Internet!!

Date codes on the later with 1 1/4 X 1 1/4 pedestal I believe is on the top side of the spring.

This eBay offering has an image with the dated information on the top side.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/88-96-Corve...Cwqs:rk:2:pf:0

Notice that regardless the fabrication everyone sells fronts as '88 through '96. That just 'ain't so' - Fit yes but very different!!!

**** The actual production code is in a block of the 'BUILD SHEET' Give the NCM some of your $$$

Last edited by WVZR-1; Dec 6, 2018 at 02:31 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 02:44 PM
  #5  
Kevova's Avatar
Kevova
Le Mans Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,192
Likes: 750
From: near the thumb in the mitten
Default

Hib Halverson made a chart listing the different spring codes FHA was the base front spring for a coupe 88-91 FSS base 92-95 FSK 92-95 Z07.
NYR base rear spring 86-93
Although unlikely early 92 assembled with in correct front spring.
The spring pad on the FSS is just a square attached to the center of the tip verses a large full tip pad.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 02:45 PM
  #6  
jefnvk's Avatar
jefnvk
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 1,024
From: AA/Metro Detroit
Default

Cool, well I guess that saves me a couple hundred bucks and saves me some work on something I wanted to do anyhow! I plan on getting the NYU to match, and the beefier bars.

Originally Posted by WVZR-1
**** The actual production code is in a block of the 'BUILD SHEET' Give the NCM some of your $$$
I've only had the thing a week, give me some time!
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 07:51 PM
  #7  
jefnvk's Avatar
jefnvk
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 1,024
From: AA/Metro Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by WVZR-1
Notice that regardless the fabrication everyone sells fronts as '88 through '96. That just 'ain't so' - Fit yes but very different!!!
Hmm, guess some other things came through between me opening the page and actually hitting reply earlier. Does that mean that later FHAs aren't really that high of spring rate, that they are, or that no one has any clue? And perhaps more importantly, is there a way to positively ID one of the 90ish spring rate springs on eBay? I'd hate to replace what I have with the same thing, or worse, replace it with something softer. Or maybe I just replace the shocks now and with the plan of dealing with new-new known springs after I run it a while.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 08:20 PM
  #8  
WVZR-1's Avatar
WVZR-1
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,388
Likes: 2,741
Default

Originally Posted by jefnvk
Hmm, guess some other things came through between me opening the page and actually hitting reply earlier. Does that mean that later FHAs aren't really that high of spring rate, that they are, or that no one has any clue? And perhaps more importantly, is there a way to positively ID one of the 90ish spring rate springs on eBay? I'd hate to replace what I have with the same thing, or worse, replace it with something softer. Or maybe I just replace the shocks now and with the plan of dealing with new-new known springs after I run it a while.
You maybe answered your own question!!!

You said "I've only had the thing a week"
What makes you 'think' you need a thing? If you don't understand the effort required in spring replacement (on the front) and have a very good reason to actually 'NEED' - I believe you drive it and enjoy!!!
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 08:31 PM
  #9  
MatthewMiller's Avatar
MatthewMiller
Le Mans Master
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,091
Likes: 1,972
From: St. Charles MO
Default

Originally Posted by jefnvk
I was examining this because I was interested in possibly taking it up to the Z51 specs springs, and this is what I was going to buy anyhow...The rear is the expected NYR 39.9, I just find it odd the front would be swapped and not the rear.
As noted, you have the base spring that would have come in your car (FE3). In 1991 there was no Z51 according to the Halverson chart, but the Z07 for 1991 had the same spring rates as the previous year's Z51, and these are commonly known as the "Challenge" springs. The front spring for this is coded FHB, and it's 115.5N/mm. The rear spring is NYU with a rate of 57.2N/mm. So you could find these springs and do your upgrade, which would get you to the 1991 Z07 spec (or 1990 Z51 spec). Swap to the solid 30mm front swaybar and 26mm rear and your suspension is then full Z07.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 09:19 PM
  #10  
jefnvk's Avatar
jefnvk
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 1,024
From: AA/Metro Detroit
Default

Originally Posted by WVZR-1
You maybe answered your own question!!!

You said "I've only had the thing a week"
What makes you 'think' you need a thing? If you don't understand the effort required in spring replacement (on the front) and have a very good reason to actually 'NEED' - I believe you drive it and enjoy!!!
That is precisely the path I'd normally take, to be honest I'd prefer if I really had a time to trial it with these. However, I bought it for AutoX, and the shocks absolutely need done (its sitting on the originals with 170k miles, and really needs brakes and every other wear item done) before the Spring. Being keen to shocks and springs working together, before I decide which direction to go with shocks, I was trying to figure out what was the best solution with springs.

Basically, I don't want shocks to be something I have to repurchase if I get halfway through the year and decide to bump up spring stiffness. Plus, ripping it apart and putting it back how I want it is the only fun I can have with it til April, it is much easier to work when it is already up on stands and ripped apart, and in the Spring I'd rather be driving it

Last edited by jefnvk; Dec 6, 2018 at 09:32 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 10:21 PM
  #11  
MatthewMiller's Avatar
MatthewMiller
Le Mans Master
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,091
Likes: 1,972
From: St. Charles MO
Default

Originally Posted by jefnvk
That is precisely the path I'd normally take, to be honest I'd prefer if I really had a time to trial it with these. However, I bought it for AutoX, and the shocks absolutely need done (its sitting on the originals with 170k miles, and really needs brakes and every other wear item done) before the Spring. Being keen to shocks and springs working together, before I decide which direction to go with shocks, I was trying to figure out what was the best solution with springs.

Basically, I don't want shocks to be something I have to repurchase if I get halfway through the year and decide to bump up spring stiffness. Plus, ripping it apart and putting it back how I want it is the only fun I can have with it til April, it is much easier to work when it is already up on stands and ripped apart, and in the Spring I'd rather be driving it
Your reasoning is sound. That said, you have two options for really good shocks that have adjustable rebound: Koni Sport and Ridetech HQ. Either of these would work with your current stock springs, and you can increase their stiffness if you replace the springs later. I'd try the Ridetechs if I were in your shoes. Depending on what class you want to run, you might want to try to find even stiffer-than-Z51 VBP springs on the used market (VBP is out of business, sadly)...or wait a year or so and see if Van Steel starts making them (as they are rumored to be planning to do).
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2018 | 11:23 PM
  #12  
jefnvk's Avatar
jefnvk
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 1,024
From: AA/Metro Detroit
Default

It will serve as a nice Friday to work and fall color run type cruiser as well, I don't want to take it quite to full race suspension. Shooting for ST class, still haven't quite decided between Koni adjustable shocks and shipping the OEMs off to Bilstein with the springs they'll be used with and telling them to valve them in a street performance/AutoX manner. I'll look into those Ridetechs too, haven't heard much about them.

Never realized the build sheets were more detailed than the RPO label, maybe I should pick one of those up sooner rather than later!
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2018 | 12:04 AM
  #13  
MatthewMiller's Avatar
MatthewMiller
Le Mans Master
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 6,091
Likes: 1,972
From: St. Charles MO
Default

Originally Posted by jefnvk
It will serve as a nice Friday to work and fall color run type cruiser as well, I don't want to take it quite to full race suspension. Shooting for ST class, still haven't quite decided between Koni adjustable shocks and shipping the OEMs off to Bilstein with the springs they'll be used with and telling them to valve them in a street performance/AutoX manner. I'll look into those Ridetechs too, haven't heard much about them.
I hear you on the dual-use thing. I will say that even with my spring rates, if I have the Konis on all four corners on a medium-ish setting, the ride is suprising decent. Shocks generally have a bigger effect on perceived ride comfort than springs, and my experience with Bilsteins has generally been that they ride fairly harsh. I suppose they have a higher proportion of compression damping, but I'm not sure. The Ridetech shocks are made from Fox monotube internals, so they are high-quality shocks at a good price (slightly cheaper than Konis, but the Konis are less desirable twin-tube designs) and effectively a lifetime warranty.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2018 | 11:02 AM
  #14  
appo1999's Avatar
appo1999
Advanced
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 52
Likes: 1
Default FHA Spring

FHA 476 Spring 88 to 91 coup spring rate 93.1 lbs
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To FHA spring question





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 AM.

story-0
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-1
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-4
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-5
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-7
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE