C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

91 l 98 cam specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2019, 08:43 PM
  #1  
bud40oz
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bud40oz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2019
Location: Jackson, mi
Posts: 397
Received 29 Likes on 25 Posts
Default 91 l 98 cam specs

i am sure it has been asked and answered before but i just looked for over a half hour to find old posts. does anyone know the stock cam specs for the 91 l 98?
Old 02-05-2019, 05:35 AM
  #2  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,990
Received 465 Likes on 368 Posts

Default

Look here.
https://www.thirdgen.org/mods3/


Last edited by bjankuski; 02-05-2019 at 08:08 AM.
The following users liked this post:
bud40oz (02-05-2019)
Old 02-05-2019, 08:59 AM
  #3  
bud40oz
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bud40oz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2019
Location: Jackson, mi
Posts: 397
Received 29 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

looking at the spec there, maybe i should just consider a roller tipped rocker in 1.6 ratio for now, the motor only has 120k on it. i know these old l98 type engines will run upwards of 300 k easily if they are pretty much the same engine as the 93 silverado trucks have, i put 300 k on one of those and that thing ran like a champ till the day i sold it.. i have been looking at cam kits but i don't know how much i really want to spend in that area right now and where do you stop. if you go with a bigger cam then you run into head flow issues and so on. then if i am thinking of spending a couple grand for a good set of heads, why stop there because the top end will grenade the lower end.
how big of a cam can you run with the stock aluminum heads without getting in trouble with valve lift i was looking at the lunati voodoo kit,

Lunati Voodoo Cam and Lifter Kits 20080721LK.

anyone ever use that cam with stock heads and valvetrain?
Old 02-05-2019, 09:18 AM
  #4  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,990
Received 465 Likes on 368 Posts

Default

I have attached some more cam information from the web page I linked, the TPIS ZZ9 or the GM ZZ3 cams are a good match to a stock TPI. The Lunati cam is not a good match, too much duration for the stock TPI, will not operate as well as the samller cams without changing the intake for a higher performance design (Shorter runner).

The stock heads are good to around .480 lift, I have been told, never checked that myself. If you need more lift you may be able to use .050 higher installed height valve keepers to get you to .530 lift range. As noted I have not checked this and this would need to be checked.

If you change the cam you will also need a tune for it to operate correctly, I am not sure if this is the direction you want to go. Put together your desired goal both performance and cost and then see what meets your goal.

Old 02-05-2019, 09:35 AM
  #5  
bud40oz
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bud40oz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2019
Location: Jackson, mi
Posts: 397
Received 29 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

oh, i forgot to mention, this car was already converted and hacked up to a carb, intake hei set up due to a fire, before i got it. i bought it as in condition for a great deal. now i am trying to make the most of what it is. and by hacked up i mean a nasty hole cut in the hood and everything. its not even a good circle cut hahaha. but oh well. for 500 bucks i won't complain.. much lol as of now i am planning on it being a edelbrock performer rpm air gap intake with a mechanical holly 650 carb. maybe 750 since i plan on some day building the old 1970 air boat 400 engine i have had tucked away in the garage for something special. just not sure if i really wanna go there with this year /make car.

so 480 lift i think maybe the 1.6 rockers would be a good choice then for now. keep it cheap and simple until i really want to build and engine properly for the car, i really do want the sound of a really nice cam though.but at the same time, for now. the money for a cam would about buy the carb/intake which is really needed since the guy put a toker 2 intake. good for like 4000-7000 rpm range. worthless for what i will be doing and then they tightened the cartb down until it cracked both front corners... so ya carb/intake are my first plans

Last edited by bud40oz; 02-05-2019 at 09:43 AM. Reason: add info
Old 02-05-2019, 09:55 AM
  #6  
Joe C
Race Director
 
Joe C's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Posts: 11,346
Received 700 Likes on 589 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bud40oz
i am sure it has been asked and answered before but i just looked for over a half hour to find old posts. does anyone know the stock cam specs for the 91 l 98?
Originally Posted by bjankuski
it may be obvious to some, but not sure anyone answered the OP's original question. using the 90-91 L98 cam's part number (10111773) for a stock engine, the specs would be as shown in the above cam chart. the chart only ID's model year 90-92, but does not ID the engine family. in this case the L98 -

Last edited by Joe C; 02-05-2019 at 10:59 AM.
Old 02-05-2019, 10:44 AM
  #7  
68post
Burning Brakes
 
68post's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 752
Received 88 Likes on 76 Posts

Default

I would not jump up to the 1.6 rockers now unless the heads are currently off the engine or will be before it's running. The pushrod holes may need to be opened to prevent binding, you cannot easily drill them out without having that metal get in the engine.
Old 02-05-2019, 11:31 AM
  #8  
bud40oz
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bud40oz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2019
Location: Jackson, mi
Posts: 397
Received 29 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

good point, i forgot about that. aluminum too, no magnet will catch those shaving
Old 02-05-2019, 12:29 PM
  #9  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,990
Received 465 Likes on 368 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 68post
I would not jump up to the 1.6 rockers now unless the heads are currently off the engine or will be before it's running. The pushrod holes may need to be opened to prevent binding, you cannot easily drill them out without having that metal get in the engine.
The pushrod holes on the alum heads are round and the rockers are self aligning, no drilling required, put on the new rockers and call it a day.
The following users liked this post:
bud40oz (02-05-2019)
Old 02-05-2019, 01:04 PM
  #10  
vader86
Team Owner
 
vader86's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Athens AL
Posts: 59,642
Received 1,400 Likes on 1,016 Posts
C7 of the Year - Unmodified Finalist 2021
C4 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Pushrod holes do not need to be drilled out, can just put them on.
The following users liked this post:
bud40oz (02-05-2019)
Old 02-05-2019, 02:29 PM
  #11  
Sleazy Rider
Le Mans Master

 
Sleazy Rider's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Conroe Texas
Posts: 5,830
Received 489 Likes on 372 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by vader86
Pushrod holes do not need to be drilled out, can just put them on.
what he said. i also used 1.6 roller tip rockers on the factory 89 cam and had no issues with the push rods rubbing.
The following users liked this post:
bud40oz (02-05-2019)
Old 02-05-2019, 03:03 PM
  #12  
bud40oz
Racer
Thread Starter
 
bud40oz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2019
Location: Jackson, mi
Posts: 397
Received 29 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

sounds like we have a winner then, nice cheap little upgrade with the 1.6 roller tipped rockers and new air gap rpm/holly it is, thanks everyone

Get notified of new replies

To 91 l 98 cam specs




Quick Reply: 91 l 98 cam specs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.