When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
GM did, as they went to sequential EFI after 93... Other than that I personally changed every fricking item on my LT1 396 and LT1 350 to no avail. Several tuners, different headers, injectors , manifolds, gaskets, throttle bodys, converted to heated O2s etc etc etc.. Nothing.
But with a wide band O2 sensor reading left and right headers during idle etc, nothing was wrong..
GM did, as they went to sequential EFI after 93... Other than that I personally changed every fricking item on my LT1 396 and LT1 350 to no avail. Several tuners, different headers, injectors , manifolds, gaskets, throttle bodys, converted to heated O2s etc etc etc.. Nothing.
But with a wide band O2 sensor reading left and right headers during idle etc, nothing was wrong..
Haha. Yeah i did all that.
Best i can do is take an averAge (btwn left and right) and set VE tables to ‘split’ the difference -make one equally rich / and fhe ofher equally lean . At least according to the o2’s.
That takes skills I dont have right now. But, if someone has a tuner that does this, it would be nice.
On a side note, who is at idle that long anyways
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019
I would suspect an injector calibrated somewhat different or O2 sensors that didn't match (calibration). If I really wanted to "see" what was going on, I'd consider swapping in a wideband or even a sniffer (like you find at a roller dyno). Then, which ever is closer to the dyno, use that O2 reading for tuning. I wouldn't be surprised if differences in scavenging (between banks) could contribute to imbalance...in the absence of other exhaust issue.