When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Interesting that the Nexen looks EXACTLY like the Riken.
I thought the same thing when I saw that post. When you compare pics side-by-side, it's clear that they are extremely close in tread design, but different enough that they use different molds. That Riken tread design (but not the recent compound) has been around for probably 15 years, so it wouldn't surprise me if another budget company used their design for "inspiration."
245/45/17 Sumitomo on the front... $180 installed.
275/40/17 Toyo R888r on the back... $340 installed.
I don't do much cruising, I am out to get kills. The Toyos hook really well when it is warm out and they are fairly light which is what I wanted for my straight line roll racer. I have 420+ whp and hit 150 frequenty. The car sits most of the time and goes out about once or twice every two weeks. I have no problems with flat spotting. I don't drive the car in the rain (ever) as I have two family cars in the driveway.
I like what 92C4Vette posted if you buy online do the local guys that mount them get offended?
Nope. When buying online I know that Tirerack has a list of installers that they ship to. As you can see there's a note near the wrench icon that talks about installers. I've done this twice to two different installers and they were happy to do the work.
Another note, on my last set I had a screw enter a tire where it could not be repaired. Tirerack had a free Road Hazard warranty. The tire installer and I went through the steps to have the tire replaced under warranty and it was pretty painless.
I like what 92C4Vette posted if you buy online do the local guys that mount them get offended?
May just be a punctuation error but I don't recall stating that tire stores get bent if you bring in online purchased tires. The only sanction I've experienced is missing out on "free mount and balance on any set of 4" deals....which I haven't seen for awhile....
Nitto NT05s are probably going on my ZR1 sized tire C4. I dont drive it enough to warrant new rims and tires to get the Michelins.
I have 140000 plus miles on the Vette. Driveline, less than 10, the entire driveline/suspension etc. Its not a show car... but, I am not here enough in country to justify driving it much..
3 years ago I got a set of Continental ExtremeContact Dry Wet (XCDW) for my 1995 base coupe. Size 285/40R17 (rear) and 255/45R17 (front). These have a "fat stripe" tread pattern (picture below). Total cost including mounting & balancing was about $750. They are a good tire, not the best and certainly not the worst. Good grip and decent treadwear. I have about 15,000 miles on them and they have some wear but not much. The sidewall does flex under hard cornering, they are not high performance tires, more of a "good enough for daily driver" tire which is why I bought them. Very quiet tire at highway speeds and they don't flat spot much. I would not use them for autocross or aggressive driving unless you're just trying to have fun (not competing). I am a moderate driver, I just have fun with the car, get on it occasionally, no track use.
3 years ago I got a set of Continental ExtremeContact Dry Wet (XCDW) for my 1995 base coupe. Size 285/40R17 (rear) and 255/45R17 (front). These have a "fat stripe" tread pattern (picture below). Total cost including mounting & balancing was about $750. They are a good tire, not the best and certainly not the worst. Good grip and decent treadwear. I have about 15,000 miles on them and they have some wear but not much. The sidewall does flex under hard cornering, they are not high performance tires, more of a "good enough for daily driver" tire which is why I bought them. Very quiet tire at highway speeds and they don't flat spot much. I would not use them for autocross or aggressive driving unless you're just trying to have fun (not competing). I am a moderate driver, I just have fun with the car, get on it occasionally, no track use.
Those are the predecessors to the current ExtremeContact Sport. They are better performing than you give them credit for. Like the Sport, they and the Michelin PS4 are the two "go-to" rain tires for any autocross or road race class that mandates 200-treadware tires, because they are better in the rain than the fastest competition-oriented tires. They are also better in cold temps. In warmer, dry weather, they are about 1-second off the times of the competition tires on a typical 50-second course. So they are very, very fast tires - just not quite as fast on a summer day as the fastest tires allowed in most classes.
285/40/17's were an oem size for the rear of my 93 40th Anniversary, not pinched at all on a 9.5" width wheel. A 245/40/17 is only 24.7" tall.
285/40/17 = 26" tall
275/40/17 = 25.7" tall
245/45/17 = 25.7" tall
245/40/17 = 24.7" tall
Those are the predecessors to the current ExtremeContact Sport. They are better performing than you give them credit for. Like the Sport, they and the Michelin PS4 are the two "go-to" rain tires for any autocross or road race class that mandates 200-treadware tires, because they are better in the rain than the fastest competition-oriented tires. They are also better in cold temps. In warmer, dry weather, they are about 1-second off the times of the competition tires on a typical 50-second course. So they are very, very fast tires - just not quite as fast on a summer day as the fastest tires allowed in most classes.
You, sir, are correct. Not sure why I'm thinking the XCDWs are regular all-season tires. They are high performance summer tires, as stated here:
Tire Rack website Continental ExtremeContact DW
And in this video at 18:00
I did have a tire guy ask where I got my tires, and he told me i should have checked with him first. When i asked what his price was, it was nearly identical to tire rack.
I previously had Kumho Ecsta ASX's on my 96 when I bought it. They were pretty old with a little tread left. Since mine is a daily, they were pretty sketchy, especially on cold mornings. They were hard as hockey pucks. But they were a ton of fun because I could slide the car around corners at 15 mph with little throttle. But when the roads are wet, I was worried I'd spin on an off ramp or jug handle.
That aside, I bought a set of BF Goodrich G-Force Sport Comp-2 A/S in December. IIRC, I got them for a little over $500. I really like them. They've got good grip, and it take quite a heavy foot to break them loose. I've driven them in the rain and have had not hydroplaned. The tires in my opinion tend to make a bit of noise (I can hear them, even without cats or mufflers) at highway speeds, otherwise I'm very happy with them, although I kind of miss being able to slide around easily with the old ones.
Note, they don't make them in 255/45ZR17 or 285/40ZR17. So I put on 255/40ZR17's up front and 275/40ZR17 on the rears.
I know this thread has been dormant about a month, but I've got one more question on the subject. I need to replace old GSD3s on my '96, and I'm torn between stepping down to 245/275 (likely the Rikens) and going all-in on replica A-molds along with new rubber. I'm leaning toward the latter, but if I go that route it means 275s on 9.5"s at all corners. What sort of difference in handling comes with the square setup? I've read that the staggered setup was intended to reduce tramlining and I'm happy with how she drives now, so if it'll be a hugely noticeable change in day-to-day driving I may think twice and stay with my staggered sawblades.
Last edited by ErrrrCar205; Feb 10, 2020 at 01:25 PM.
The C4 was developed with square tire set up as you want. But, ensure you have a solid alignment to compliment it. I would recommend the square set up. And since it will be a 275 set up, there are some 285/275 choices out there better than Riken.
Discount Tire Direct is having a flash sale today and tomorrow $80 off a set of four select tires including Continentals. I ordered four 275/40-17 Conti ECS for almost Firestone Indy 500 pricing.