Offset for 18x10.5” wheel 1985
Second, there are numerous people on this forum that have fit 245 tires and 18x12 rims on rear of C4. But most of them had to do more than just pick the correct best offset for them to fit. Either they add fender flares or they modified their suspensions with shorter custom axle shafts and supports. You then got to ask yourself the possibility of tires rubbing during spirited driving. Are your shocks and springs tough enough to prevent that? There is an excitement factor to want to try to keep going bigger, but there becomes a point where to big just becomes too much of a hassle, unless youre racing seriously and can justify the cost and hassle. For a street car, I'd highly recommend not going over 315s, they are hard enough to fit. Im not saying you cant make a 315/335 combo work, but what are you really gaining?
Regarding to performance.... In the front there are a couple of factors for performance. Water evacuation is one. Another one is, how far away the tire contact surface center point is away from the hub pivot point, and how does that differ from stock. When the pivot point is not in the middle, more of the tire will have drag in turning, meaning needing to break grip to allow tire to turn. And the wider the tire, the more that problem increases. Narrower tires on front can sometimes handle and grip better for that reason. You could probably feel the difference in required steering wheel turning strength, such as when parking. Im gonna argue that to tackle things like grip and water handling, the biggest factor is going to be tire brand, compound and tread, and matching that to your need. Tire size will be more about fitment and cosmetics. Obviously wider rear tires will have more hook, if all things else are equal.
I think the problem people often make is they try to solve everything with one tire and rim selection, which just isn't possible. If you want low cost and local availabilty you can get a federal tire, get decent dry grip, good water evacuation, long lasting, but you'll suffer on wet grip and noisiness, and you probably wont be winning autocross/roadraces. Or get a Nitto 555G2 for a very good compromise of everything, for street/trackday. (my favorite). But again, you're not going to winning races. There are so many other brands that are faster, but more expensive, and shorter lasting tires.
I just put the 315's from Nitto on my car, and they are narrower than the BFGs that were on there. All brands are not created equal.
So, buy it and if you like it, which I am sure you will. R888s are on some high end cars running around, as secondary tires after old OEM ones wear out, and have great grip..
I just put the 315's from Nitto on my car, and they are narrower than the BFGs that were on there. All brands are not created equal.
So, buy it and if you like it, which I am sure you will. R888s are on some high end cars running around, as secondary tires after old OEM ones wear out, and have great grip..
The most famous picture in the car forums is the Good Year Eagle F1 laying next to a set of Summitomos. Both were 315/35/17. The Good Years were much wider. I dont care what anyone says, but manufactures measure from different areas of the tires.
Its like shoes.. Ever had to buy a pair of shoes from Nike that was a different number than one from Puma, or, Vans.... Just throwing names out there.
My OEM Good Years that came on my Vette were much wider than the Firestone SZ50s ( 1997-1999 era). Visually the actual contact patch on the road was narrower, yet they had the same numbers. 255/17 front, and 285/17 year. Looked stupid..
My BFG KDs were visually wider, and wider ( using a ruler) mounted on same rim than the new Nittos I just bought. But same size according to manufacture.
Is it a issue DOT needs to address, Car manufacuers? Who knows. But it is what it is.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Guys, the issue with nominal section widths vs differing actual sizes is because the section with is measured at the widest part of the sidewall and mounted on a standardized rim at a standardized pressure. Their section widths unmounted, or mounted on your rims, and inflated to different pressures, can vary because of this. To make it more inexact, we know that the industry delineates nominal section widths into 10mm intervals: there is no "317/35/17" tire, for example. So we can assume that the tires aren't made to conform millimeter-perfect to the nominal widths. If the industry measures a new model of tire and it is 311mm, and another new one 319mm, they probably both round to a nominal 315 size. Finally, the correlation between section width and tread width is pretty loose: even tires that have the exact same section width can have very different tread widths.
Last edited by MatthewMiller; Dec 13, 2020 at 12:48 PM.
I think I will be happy with the 305/35 r888r’s, I would like the 315/30 too but since I’m going from a 16 inch wheel I think it would be better to get the one with a bit more sidewall so it isn’t as big of a change. Just in case I would think the 315/30 looks like it doesn’t match my car right because I’m used to seeing it with a big sidewall with the 16 inch wheels. I know I will like either size though just because of how wide they are, I think the wide tires just look so much better and fit right on the car. It seems like the 305 in the r888r’s will be more like a 315 since they run pretty wide.
I found out how I can get them with white letters too. At tirestickers.com they do letter size matching so they can make white rubber stickers that will fit right over the letters on the tires. I will send the tires to them and they will install the white letters and then ship them to me. Here’s a picture of how they look only the “R” will be red. I have red stripes to put on the hood of my car so it will match good. Asking as the tires last somewhere around 7,000 miles then I know I will be happy with them, by the time I would drive that much they would need replaced anyway from being old so I don’t think I would need one with better treadware.
Last edited by MatthewMiller; Mar 27, 2021 at 06:17 PM.
Last edited by 85 CRVET; Mar 8, 2021 at 12:14 PM.
I don't know if you plan to have the company you're buying the wheels from ship them to you with tires already mounted or not. If not, and you get the tires separately, it might be a good idea to just mount one tire to one wheel and try it on the car front and rear first. Drive it around a couple miles and make sure it fits the way you want and doesn't make any contact. Then if the worst happens and it doesn't fit well, you can return the three unmounted tires (and maybe even the mounted one for at least some credit) and get 295/35/18 instead. That size would be a step narrower and shorter (26.1" diameter) and would have no fitment issues, and it would still have more sidewall than the 315/30/18s you see in my pics. Just a suggestion, since I can't be 100% sure your desired tire size is going fit perfectly.
I don't know if you plan to have the company you're buying the wheels from ship them to you with tires already mounted or not. If not, and you get the tires separately, it might be a good idea to just mount one tire to one wheel and try it on the car front and rear first. Drive it around a couple miles and make sure it fits the way you want and doesn't make any contact. Then if the worst happens and it doesn't fit well, you can return the three unmounted tires (and maybe even the mounted one for at least some credit) and get 295/35/18 instead. That size would be a step narrower and shorter (26.1" diameter) and would have no fitment issues, and it would still have more sidewall than the 315/30/18s you see in my pics. Just a suggestion, since I can't be 100% sure your desired tire size is going fit perfectly.














