built simple flow bench to test ported heads, intake manifold
built exhaust using some modified stock parts. headers to modified y pipe to 3.5" center pipe with 3.5" high flow cat . modified stock rear y pipe to high flow mufflers. didn't go with bigger pipes ,because I didn't think it was needed for this setup. Will have to change if renegade manifold ever comes back. can install stock starter with these headers.
second picture shows fabricated bracket for external fuel pressure regulator. don't know where other people put their fuel regulators. not much room. used hard lines.
I'm to the point where I flat out refuse to spend more time looking for a tool than it takes to do the job, especially when it's not where I put it the day before

I'm to the point where I flat out refuse to spend more time looking for a tool than it takes to do the job, especially when it's not where I put it the day before
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
second photo shows stock port on left and right port that is ported to 1.5" tall. ported runner flows 225 cfm with clay entrance.
third photo shows stock port side wall thickness about an inch in on port #2 where the water jacket is in between the ports.
forth photo is showing the side wall thickness port #7 where the water jacket is in between the ports.
5th photo shows top wall thickness for end port. A little thinner.
6th photo shows outside wall thickness of end ports.
last photo shows side wall thickness for port #3 and #6 entrance.
hope this helps anyone that want to port intake.
A little update. entrance is now 1.7 high. runners 2 and 7 taper from 1.2 to 1.1, because of water jacket.
could rise the height to 1.5". there is room for that. My instinct are telling me this manifold is done. 215cfm. did port another manifolds runner to 1.5" main runner, it flowed 225cfm. 1.5 starts getting into top plate bolt holes. would need to use sealer. most likely 225cfm is the max that I can get.
Last edited by mike1111; Jan 1, 2024 at 05:38 PM.
really like sonic tester for checking wall thickness of intake manifold.
Installed intake with 1.4x1.1 main runners with .5 rod welded on entrance, flows 215cfm. could have raised and widen the runners to 1.5 x1.125 to get to +/- 230cfm.I wasn't comfortable with making walls that thin. the truth is, the 4 inner runners are easier to get to flow than the outer 4 runner. had to make outer entrances wider and or higher to match inter runners flow numbers. May do another all-out intake manifold at some point, now that I have a better idea of the wall thicknesses. as the ports get bigger the efficiency seems to goes down.
a rough way of estimating cfm per runner size with no round rod welded to entrance and rounding and tapering entrance as much as possible. is to multiply the CSA by 126. 1.4x1.1=1.54x126=194cfm 1.5x1.125=1.6875x126=212cfm. adding rod to entrance will add about 15 cfm, depending on size of runner and location of runner. I think 230cfm is the maximum with rod welded to entrance, because there isn't any more room. I'm sure someone with more experience could get more. I'm just a guy in a garage.
I'm fine with 215 cfm. considering the stock manifold flows from 148cfm to around 160 cfm depending on runner. runners are a little rough and inconsistence size and shape. 4 different types of entrances.
seems like I have to do things multiple time. must be how I learn.
of course, I missed some things. hooking up power to fan relay, tach wire not hooked up. no big deal. I'm not sure I wired the 3 wire O2 sensor correctly or if I used correct O2 sensor, wants to die once it's warned up. no fuel leaks, no water leaks, no oil leaks. needs to be timed. going to check for vacuum leaks also. just got it running.
exhaust sounds good, but way to loud for me. dynomax super turbos. fix this last.
For people that want to do max porting on stock crossfire intake manifold. used $100 sonic test to check wall thickness. wall thickness varies. 230cfm is possible if you're comfortable with some of the wall thickness being as thin as .0625. I'm not. the only way I would do it is if the 2-water jacket between 4 of the runners are welded up. that's for another day. If renegade manifold comes back, then there's no point in doing it.
I would test drive it, but I live in NW and it rains a lot this time of year. rain/snow mix right now. would just spin the wheels. Need to fix exhaust anyways.
The Super Turbo has two open tailpipes but only really flows out of one of them.
The other sits in a camber with a wall in front of it ... just adds to the noise.
You can plug that one without hurting performance.
It will reduce the sound but probably not enough for you ... maybe just for a test drive?
I failed an emission test once because the kid put the probe in the "dead end" tailpipe and there wasn't enough flow to register on the machine.
You can imagine a little arguing happened and he retested it using the other tailpipe

Last edited by SuperL98; Mar 2, 2024 at 07:04 AM.
The Super Turbo has two open tailpipes but only really flows out of one of them.
The other sits in a camber with a wall in front of it ... just adds to the noise.
You can plug that one without hurting performance.
It will reduce the sound but probably not enough for you ... maybe just for a test drive?
I failed an emission test once because the kid put the probe in the "dead end" tailpipe and there wasn't enough flow to register on the machine.
You can imagine a little arguing happened and he retested it using the other tailpipe

The Super Turbo has two open tailpipes but only really flows out of one of them.
The other sits in a camber with a wall in front of it ... just adds to the noise.
You can plug that one without hurting performance.
It will reduce the sound but probably not enough for you ... maybe just for a test drive?
I failed an emission test once because the kid put the probe in the "dead end" tailpipe and there wasn't enough flow to register on the machine.
You can imagine a little arguing happened and he retested it using the other tailpipe

haven't taken off muffler to check input side, that's a unknown at this point. this is what bore scope showed. 3" input and 2- 2.5" output. loud
That's what my pictures show.
If you are using the generic three inch center in two pipes out, whole different animal ... I can believe it's loud

Interesting to see what the inside looks like.
They wouldn't just flow through the perforations, has to be open paths through the pipes.
It's really just four GlassPack mufflers, not really a turbo design ... if true.
The Mass flowing into the muffler has to match the Mass coming out (conservation of Mass theory).
But the hot exhaust gas is going to lose a lot of temperature going through the muffler, so the Volume (cfm) going in is more than the Volume (cfm) coming out.
If it looks like my drawing, pretty sure you can plug one of these outlets and not hurt the overall flow through the muffler ... just reduce the noise.
Be interesting to see ....

That's what my pictures show.
If you are using the generic three inch center in two pipes out, whole different animal ... I can believe it's loud

Interesting to see what the inside looks like.
They wouldn't just flow through the perforations, has to be open paths through the pipes.
It's really just four GlassPack mufflers, not really a turbo design ... if true.
The Mass flowing into the muffler has to match the Mass coming out (conservation of Mass theory).
But the hot exhaust gas is going to lose a lot of temperature going through the muffler, so the Volume (cfm) going in is more than the Volume (cfm) coming out.
If it looks like my drawing, pretty sure you can plug one of these outlets and not hurt the overall flow through the muffler ... just reduce the noise.
Be interesting to see ....














