When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I assumed you were looking to 'lighten the load' even more and you were interested in after-market that might have accomplished that. I doubt it ever was done. A rather complicated fabrication.
I assumed you were looking to 'lighten the load' even more and you were interested in after-market that might have accomplished that. I doubt it ever was done. A rather complicated fabrication.
..... You are correct ... I'm looking for an aftermarket subframe (if one exists) to replace the factory K-Member ... definitely NOT interested in replacing it with original stuff .....
I wish. Someone on here or a vendor said they might work on if there was enough interest. I don't remember the thread or how long ago it was. I figure at some point someone will make one since LS swapping and drag racing old C4s seems to be heating up and cad and cnc machines are abundant.
..... You are correct ... I'm looking for an aftermarket subframe (if one exists) to replace the factory K-Member ... definitely NOT interested in replacing it with original stuff .....
I don't know how much lightening it would take without weakening it ... the modification possibilities are endless in a way ... the shock towers need a lot of work on the early cars to get a coil over set up mounted , then after you coil it the bulk of the crossmember/transverse spring container still exists ... the motor mount brackets are "odd" ... the steering rack mounts "odd" as well . The harmonious balancer tends to fight with the crossmember , especially if you have dreams of lowering the engine in the chassis ... But the OE works for what was intended and nuts like me are kinda few and far between . I was just hoping that someone , somewhere who supported the "spirited drivers" had developed a more sophisticated suspension bracketry for the C4 .
You know, given the discussion about the compromised later C4 front suspension geometry and the difficult coilover situation for the early C4 shock towers you mentioned, someone really should make a tubular K-member for these cars! Aside from being able to fix all that, it would be lighter and would allow a lot more space for good oil pans and lower engine placement. If only I had lots of time and money...and knew how to fabricate and weld.
You know, given the discussion about the compromised later C4 front suspension geometry and the difficult coilover situation for the early C4 shock towers...
This is the first time I've ever heard about the later front suspension geometry not being better than the earlier. Please explain. I am looking to learn something here.
I think you're well versed with the topic. Build your own? The shock tower is welded to the frame but I suppose you could grind it off... probably simple to weld on a new fabricated shock tower.
I think the OEM can be modified easier. The 1992+ K Members and ZR1 are a big improvement in some ways (other than the 1988+ geometry) and MUCH easier to adapt to the LS (I think that's what you're looking to do). The inside seams can also be stich welded and a few seams don't go 100%. Clearance for a larger crank dampner or engine lowering can be done, relocating the steering rack is a little bit more work. The earlier 84-87 K members are easier to modify the upper arm mounts to change geometry (anti dive and roll center, roll center stability). The OEM seems to be fairly good quality hard steel otherwise.
This is the first time I've ever heard about the later front suspension geometry not being better than the earlier. Please explain. I am looking to learn something here.
It's discussed in decent detail here, and I'm sure some other threads as well.
Originally Posted by AZSP33D
I think you're well versed with the topic. Build your own? The shock tower is welded to the frame but I suppose you could grind it off... probably simple to weld on a new fabricated shock tower.
True. I was thinking mainly about adapting a tubular K member to a later car, which already has more usable shock towers. For an early car, there are ways to skin that cat, as you say. The 84-87 front geometry is generally better for performance, and my main goal for such a project would be to replicate that. The "zero scrub" geometry causes some real problems with steering axis inclination and camber loss, and the later subframes have way too much anti-drive baked in.
You know, given the discussion about the compromised later C4 front suspension geometry and the difficult coilover situation for the early C4 shock towers you mentioned, someone really should make a tubular K-member for these cars! Aside from being able to fix all that, it would be lighter and would allow a lot more space for good oil pans and lower engine placement. If only I had lots of time and money...and knew how to fabricate and weld.