When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Assuming that my 80,000 mile car still had 330hp and 340tq at the crank. Then factoring in a %15 drivetrain loss.
I'm up 5hp and 15tq over stock
The real difference i feel is the torque comes in much sooner over stock.
Assuming that my 80,000 mile car still had 330hp and 340tq at the crank. Then factoring in a %15 drivetrain loss.
I'm up 5hp and 15tq over stock
The real difference i feel is the torque comes in much sooner over stock.
The 15% number is not right, IMO....IF your car is a stick. 10% is much more realistic for stick shift cars.
For reference, my LT1 stick is BOX stock, other than a K&N the PO put in it. At ~155,000 miles, that car did 278/312. Stock manifolds, exhaust, mufflers, everything. Stock.
Knowing that the car was rated 300 horse, flywheel from the factory, ^that's^ less than 10% drivetrain loss.
Last edited by Tom400CFI; Jun 12, 2023 at 09:34 PM.
The 15% number is not right, IMO....IF your car is a stick. 10% is much more realistic for stick shift cars.
For reference, my LT1 stick is BOX stock, other than a K&N the PO put in it. At ~155,000 miles, that car did 278/312. Stock manifolds, exhaust, mufflers, everything. Stock.
Knowing that the car was rated 300 horse, flywheel from the factory, ^that's^ less than 10% drivetrain loss.
I'll get it scanned for codes, I have had a check engine light on and figured it was from the lack of rear O2 sensors before the tune. Now I'm curious, ill also be running a compression test on it.
Called around a few shops and got a very basic quote to get all the machine work done to the block. If turning it into a 383 and getting the heads checked and p&p its going to run me about $1600.
I found this kit in an older thread about 383s and its on sale soooo..... Around 4k if I do all the assembly myself. Not as bad as I figured
IME back in the 1980s, working on cars from the 1960s and 1970s headers, exhaust and a tune was the easiest and cheapest horsepower available, beating heads, cams and intakes by a wide margin for a lot less $$$.
IME 50hp is a lot to expect from just headers, but I would say 25 is probably a sure thing.
Then you had to just have deal with the headers leaking every 6 weeks ..... which is why I personally never put headers on a car any more.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.
