When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a 421 ready for a cam. I don't have enough money for a mini-ram so what size cam should I run with a stock ported intake. I have slp runners and a BBK 58 mm tb.
First of all, that motor will be effectively worthless with anything resembling the stock TPI manifold on it. If you have big tube or siamesed runners, you *may* get away with it. The stock runners, however, are the choke-point on that manifold.
If you have something bigger than the stock TPI to put on it, send me the info on the heads you have and where you want your peak power to be made, and I can give you some numbers.
Re: 421 in 88 vette suggestions (CorvetteZ51Racer)
the heads and block are already I need to decide on a cam to put together. how hard is it to put a lt-1 intake on a 79 400 block? the heads are pocket ported and polished 2.05 intake and 1.62 exhaust springs on heads will take up to a 550 lift. I'd really like to port the stock plennum and buy a edelbroc tpi base. I have SLP siamesse runners and a BBK 58 mm tb already
Well, not "choked to death", but I used ported stock TPI intake and runners on my 406, along with AFR 195cc heads, '88 roller cam, and stock throttle body, and Ford SVO 24lb injectors. My peak torque moved from 3200 to 2700, and over 400 lb/ft of torque up to 4600 rpm. Since I rarely run the engine above 4000 rpm, it doesn't matter to me how much horsepower I do or don't make above 6000 rpm; For my specific application, which is going from 70mph to 120 mph on I-4, plus responsive around-town driving, the TPI is hard to beat.
Smaller area intakes don't "kill" an engine- just shifts the powerband in the RPM range; If you want to build a fun engine to drive, port out your existing TPI and enjoy it- if you want to come onto the forum and brag about how many horsies you make at 6500 rpm, spend the money on the big box.
Jeez, after reading the comments here on how miserable the TPI is, I am amazed my car started this am! :lol:
I find it interesting that GM uses an induction set-up similar to the stock L98 (long runners), as well as ‘the’ original L98 throttle body on their RamJet 502. Maybe they know something we don’t?
you deffinately don't want the stock intake on it. If money is tight you can temporarily use the intake and tune down the motor to accomodate it. Then go with something close to a tpis mini ram or the stealth ram. I would hate to see all that potential power go to waste. Personally, I say that your springs aren't going to be enough. I have some parts ("509" 400 block and reher morrison 421 crank) and my plan is a tpis solid roller, mini ram, and brodix track 1 head. With a FAST system I see no reason why it woudn't make 500 at the wheels
"I find it interesting that GM uses an induction set-up similar to the stock L98 (long runners), as well as ‘the’ original L98 throttle body on their RamJet 502. Maybe they know something we don’t?"
Well, what do those silly GM engineers know about anything, anyway? I believe the stock throttle body was also used in the original 254 mph "Hammer" that Lingenfelter built, and also in the Calloway twin turbo cars- those seem to run ok. :D
I find it interesting that GM uses an induction set-up similar to the stock L98 (long runners), as well as ‘the’ original L98 throttle body on their RamJet 502. Maybe they know something we don’t?
The TPI design is a good design. It did what GM wanted the stock motor to do. It just provides hardly any room for modification. If you look at the design of the RamJet intake, it's design is similar to the TPI's, but the runners are MUCH shorter on the RamJet(the stock TPI runners are 22" from plenum to intake valve) and much larger in diameter in order to feed the larger motor. I don't think people meant that the TPI *design* is bad, just the size of the runners.