When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Before I was aware of this forum I chose to change my cam for something a little more daring, did a little research, got some advice and bought and installed a cam with the following spec:
SB-Chevy (87-Up): Hydraulic Roller
Grind: 264 Lift: .487''/.495'' RPM Range: 1200-5200 and the lobe separation is 110 deg
Is the standard 112 deg for a L98 Vette? My Fast chip is programmed to the 110 duration but what difference to performance will 110 make over 112?
Alittle bit more mid-range, a little more lope, and a little less vac. at idle. Little is the key word here. Not a lot of change in any areas, if your ECM can handle it. The 112 would give a broader TQ curve, and a little more top end. Just my .02.
As a general rule, a tighter LSA (smaller numerically) will increase peak power numbers at the expense of a shorter RPM range from peak TQ to peak HP. A wider LSA will have more idle vacuum with a smoother idle, and will have a wide power band at the expense of lower peak numbers.
Cam duration is determined by stroke length and desired RPM for peak HP.
One of the many parameter questions that fast chip asked before programming was LSA. Before the chip my timing was well out and you could hear most of the power going straight out of the exhaust. The difference the chipmade was fantastic.
Thanks for the help guys, I thought I may have made a big mistake but I am less concerned now that my pennies were spent ok. :thumbs:
I just got off the the phone with John at fastchip before I logged on here. I am trying to swap in a motor with a 110 LSA , 242/248 .050 cam. He said hmm....you should get a 112 for vacuum purposes. Gonna have to ask Ed about this one. Give me a call Tuesday. This 110 cam is typically for carburetors." I will see what they say tomorrow........
I just got off the the phone with John at fastchip before I logged on here. I am trying to swap in a motor with a 110 LSA , 242/248 .050 cam. He said hmm....you should get a 112 for vacuum purposes. Gonna have to ask Ed about this one. Give me a call Tuesday. This 110 cam is typically for carburetors." I will see what they say tomorrow........
With that much duration and a 110 LSA, you will have low idle vacuum. There isn't any difference between the LSA you want to use for carb or EFI, BUT, stock ECM systems with a chip will be really irritated with that narrow of an LSA and that much duration (read: lots of overlap) at or near idle.
Ok, ok, I'm out of my depth a bit with all the tech stuff, what I would really like to know is when I put my foot down what difference would it make assuming my chip is doing all the correct compensating?
:steering: :confused:
Update
Just got off the phone with John at fastchip. He spoke to Ed and Ed said he cannot tune a chip for a cam with 110* LS and the kind of lift mine has. said it would have no idle/vac and that my 89's computer is too slow. I oughta get a DFI and it tune it myself he said.
Bummer. :banghead:
oh yeah, also said that they can't tune "Accel" brand injectors....that they suck! I wanted to re-use mine but no dice.
Who can tune this chip for me? Anyone know? 242/248 .050 and 110* LSA
Thats the problem with fastchips, they claim to sell a custom chip for your application, but they can't program for Accel injectors, make you use a 160* thermostat - come on, this is custom ?
Negative. :cry He wanted nothing to do with it!
Am gonna try 3 other companies and if no luck, cam comes out.
Apology to Gareth for hijacking your thread. Sorry mate.
I just want to log my experience so others reading this don't suffer too.