stealth ram or mini ram ?
The majority of the forum is new to swapping manifolds and could be perceived as impressionable.
:iagree:
(1) BUT , having seen that EFI modified tunnel ram intake in the picture above for the VERY first time today, I could hardly have copied it almost a year ago!
(2)the picture looks like nice work!
(3) you may not be aware that the stealth ram only came out about a year ago, NOT several years ago like your claiming so I obviously did not and could not have copied any stealth ram modification untill it existed.
(4) I have also made modified SY1 CARB intake to EFI mods and CROWER fuel injection intake mods, and converted crower constant flow to EFI injection
(5) since the TPI throttle body and basic HOLLEY EFI intake plus the corvette hood line only allow certain mods to fit and function its not that unusual that most solutions will tend to have some similar design features to allow the linkage, ETC. to fit and function
(6) all internal bracing, connection locations and air flow design on the http://www.fasterdeals.com/garageindex.html
are extremely similar to HOLLEYS orriginal design,
so almost every internal and external feature EXCEPT total height,and VACUME port locations and distributor clearance are similar, and those modifications were made for greater ease of installation or clearance, the main differance is only lower height and easier installation. BUT the differance is enought to allow the custom intake to fit and function in a TPI corvette
[Modified by grumpyvette, 12:40 AM 8/30/2003]
(1) BUT , having seen that EFI modified tunnel ram intake in the picture above for the VERY first time today, I could hardly have copied it almost a year ago!
IM here to HELP other corvette owners, I have not made any profit yet and built a limited run of custom plenums soley to help other corvette owners, and allow them to use the stealth ram , I don,t know what your problem is, but have a great life!
[Modified by grumpyvette, 2:22 AM 8/30/2003]
custom stealth ram, because your working for my competition who took my first proto-type design, and took the measurements off my corvette,then took that first proto type design and modified it for cheap production, made it from folded aluminum sheet metal, and started selling it before ever testing it on an engine!
or your looking at pictures and making up you mind on looks with ZERO INDEPENDANT COMPARITIVE DATA
since I know for a fact you have never testedBOTH of those two intakes and since I was the guy that came up with the basic idea, and have tested that first design , as it was an early discarded proto-type, and I found several problems with it, I can,t beleive that you would with no data, try and push a product that was built with NO TESTING EVER DONE on a actual engine!
IF your convinced its a better product BUY IT! TEST IT at YOUR EXPENCE, AND LET US KNOW HOW IT WORKS! (I ALREADY KNOW!)
I am responding to your request. Sorry you don't like the facts. When you make false accusations of accusing me of working for someone I never meet and want facts, be sure you have your ducks in a row before you call me out.
I have no vested interest in anything other than being sure that people are not fooled into something I know doesn’t work. If you feel differently please post your documented results. Needless to say you’re here for the potential to profit off the sale.
I think both make good points and in my mind, yes the Jury is still out on the Stealthram as Blownvette has aptly pointed out. But, on the flip side, I give a big thumbs up to people such as Grumpyvette who is attempting to develop and refine a product for TPI motors.... which as a lot of you know, has taken a big backseat to the newer generation LS-1 by the engine product developers & tuners. Regardless of if the final outcome is good or bad with the Stealthram.... I give Grumpy a thumbs up for the effort.
My suggestion... lets just sit back and wait and see the results of this intake as more people try it.
cheers,
Beach Bum





I give a big thumbs up to people such as Grumpyvette who is attempting to develop and refine a product for TPI motors.... which as a lot of you know, has taken a big backseat to the newer generation LS-1 by the engine product developers & tuners. Regardless of if the final outcome is good or bad with the Stealthram.... I give Grumpy a thumbs up for the effort.
My suggestion... lets just sit back and wait and see the results of this intake as more people try it.
:iagree:
Blown Vette lighten up will ya? :crazy:
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts







If you understood what I posted you should be thanking me for the warning about the flawed box. I have a lot more information that will be given on this subject.
Please let us know..........were all waiting.


Currently I am still waiting for a post that contains any substantiation to the supposed testing.
only independent dyno results by someone with no agenda will be valid and even then the part being tested must match the rest of combo being tested,to bring out the best results, any one can make any part look good or bad by carefully matching or mis-matching the total parts in a test.
below youll see a few dyno tests compareing the ported TPI,miniram and stealth ram, their will be almost ZERO differance between the standard stealth ram plenum in the testing and the custom plenum, in spite of what SOME individuals with no data are sure to say.
there will be independent data shortly on the custom stealth ram as several individuals are now running and testing it on their cars , and the average results will show what does and does not tend to work well
in the mean time heres independent data on the standard stealth ram vs other intake manifolds
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28...age021105.html
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28...MRwebpage.html
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~davis/z28...age010511.html
:thumbs:
If you want to buy something based on a seller telling you it is great, that is your choice. When I see a better option and am falsely accused of working for someone and attacked for my opinion on an open forum I will defend myself and start the process to expose the flaws. I doubt many of the posters have much experience with fabricated parts as a quick check of the listed mods of those replying on this thread think a mod worth mentioning is a gutted CAT and a K&N filter. Just the same they are just the type that are impressionable enough to be influenced by hype
[B]If you notice in the posts made by the vendor selling the black box you will notice when ever he makes a statement and someone asks for more information there is no reply or a cut and paste of someone else’s work on a factory produced manifold. There is a difference and as I stated above if it is ever tuned by someone with experience the flaws will surface. My view is that there is a better choice that the painted box.
The opinion I want to get across is:
1) The black box is a copy of what we did about five years ago. We found a problem and the fix is not in either plenum.
2) The seller of the black box makes claims that it is a proven piece and it is not. The reply above is a case and point.
3) The seller uses information of a factory piece to represent his product. They are different and if someone that knows what they are doing ever tests it the design won’t be able to be repaired. The other one will be able to be fixed.





1) The black box is a copy of what we did about five years ago. We found a problem and the fix is not in either plenum.


I will step up and purchase the HSR as is from summit and have it shipped to Jesse, if grumpyvette will provide the plenum and fuel rails. I am sure another forum member has a small base distributor to send to Jesse for a test, if he doesn't have one already.
How about it grumpyvette? You've got nothing to lose by sending your product to Jesse if it works as you have stated. I am willing to spend $300.00 to find out if your plenum works in independent testing.
Step up to the plate and stand behind your product. If there is a flaw in your design I have all the faith in the world that Jesse will find it.
Lowered 1¾", 180° stat, '93 Chrome Emblems, Cut Air Lid & K&N, Kenwood MP3 CD Player, Sylvania Silverstars


I think you can provide these answers without helping the manufacturer of the product.
Examples of how you can explain:
- It is flawed because of the inconsistent air flow to different cylinders due to the restrictions....
- Due to the plenum being redesigned and the flow pattern being altered from the redesign, it flows less....
Examples of BAD explanations:
- This thing is the king of all that sucks because it sucks
- It dont work because it dont work
I dont think we are being unreasonable by asking you to support your claims with facts. Much like how you asked Grumpy to support his claims of his product with facts.







