Some facts about thermostats
As Alex mentioned the Hypertech does appear better made with better materials. That was my reason for choosing it. I use the 180 on my 88 in the Central Valley of California where we had 17 days over 100 in July. Main fan never came on as the car never reached 230. The auxiliary kicks in at about 200 on my car.
Somebody above asked why GM didn't use a 160F if it would benefit. There are a number of reasons but in short, they will optimize the car for emissions, fuel economy, etc, not just hp and max life of the cooling system (seen plenty of cracked plastic radiator tanks).
[Modified by rkessel, 9:51 PM 11/1/2003]
The reason they put in a hotter stat is strictly for emmisions.
Lowering the temp with a cooler stat will save you some ponies, but not after the engine is completely heat soaked, when the race gets down to the final few and it's round robin.
If you want optimal race temp, lower the stat, install an electric pump (LT1) and always race it at running temp.
Oh and water cools much better than coolant. During the summer months you could drain the coolant and put in water, but don't leave it or you could end up with a rusted system.
[Modified by MyX10sion, 11:02 PM 11/2/2003]
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
My point here is that if the temp of the coolant as it leaves the radiator isn't sufficiently cooled, the hot block will simply heat it higher and higher each time it passes through.
[Modified by MyX10sion, 12:46 PM 11/13/2003]
1. In summer (PHX has more than 100 days over 100) I run a Moroso restrictor plate with a 1/2" opening instead of a stat. Engines stay pretty close to 175 degrees.
2. In winter, I change to a 180 because with the restrictor plate I can't get my '89 over 147 degrees no matter how long & fast I drive when its 70 degrees or less outside.
3. Opening dimensions (thus, coolant flow rate capability) of a stat is not necessarily determined by the outside diameter of the moving close-off assembly. I.e., if the sliding portion that opens at designated temp only allows a narrow slit, even though its diameter is greater, it may not flow more than one like the HyperTech (or the s/s Stants) that have a small diameter, but very unrestricted opening.
4. Always place a stat (new or an old one going back in) in pan of water on stove & heat before using. Use oven thermometer to check when it actually starts to open & when it gets to full open. Then watch as it cools and see how fast it closes. I've bought bad ones and someone taught me this many years ago. A little time, but no money!
5. Those saying too much flow can be bad are right - too much flow & coolant can't pick up enough heat from engine or disipate enough in the radiator.
6. If you change stats for winter, consider getting the new FlePro thermostat housing gasket that is plastic with an o-ring (about $5). You can re-use them & no sealer req'd :) Clean bolt holes & threads. Remember not to tighten them too much. Tighten stat housing bolts evenly back & forth to no more than 20 ft lbs torque.
OOPS - I forgot. It's always a good idea to drill the edge of the stat so it will flow a little bit even when closed fully. This will make burping all air out of the system easier too. I use a small (3/32") bit and make 3 holes around the edge - making sure I don't bend anything or interfere with the seating in the recess of the intake. Tip comes from the old TPIS Performance Book.
On burping air from the system, L98s are harder than most cars because the radiator cap sits lower than the highest coolant passages in the intake/heads. We all know about holding revs @ 1,800 or so when stat is open to evacuate air, topping off, & sealing the cap before returning engine to idle. Another thing I did was to buy a Moroso in-line filler pipe. It's a cast aluminum "T" that goes into the highest point of the upper radiator hose & takes a regular radiator cap. No plastic. Anyway, it sure makes things easier.
[Modified by NavyVet, 12:25 PM 11/13/2003]

I have no doubts that this is the case, I'm just trying to think of the best way to explain to folks that this urban myth is false.
If the coolant spends less time in the radiator, it doesn't cool off as much, but flow is the same, so it also spends less time in the engine, and picks up less heat.
You don't even have to look at the engine side of things for this to make sense. At steady state, heat transfer from the engine to the coolant equals heat transfer from the coolant to the radiator equals heat transfer from the radiator to outside air.
Heat transfer is dependent on temperature difference. As a mass of heated coolant makes its way through the radiator, it decreases in temperature as it loses heat to the metal in the radiator fins. As it cools, the temperature difference between that coolant and the outside air decreases... therefore, less heat transfer occurs. The longer that coolant stays in the radiator, the cooler it gets, and the less effective the radiator is.
Now, if that water is flowing MUCH faster, it doesn't have as much time to cool, so it's hotter exiting the radiator, has a greater temperature difference, therfore MORE heat transfer occurs in the same amount of time.
Don't think of it in terms of temperatures, but in terms of heat transfer. And please, think about this before you start rebutting it. I don't want to argue for the sake of arguing and have nothing to gain by being condescending. It's never too late to learn something new. :)


Last week I bought a Stant 180F tstat at Advance Auto parts for $9.98. Pulled my Hypertech 160 out for winter.
See: http://www.napabeltshose.com/index.cfm?location_id=1000
Also Motorad makes the Hypertech 160 stat & "brand labeled" thermostats for others.
See: http://www.motradusa.com
[Modified by LT4BUD, 8:09 AM 11/1/2003]
liquids are for all intense and purposes conducting energy by means of conduction.
liquids in the closed system of the engine are ALWAYS in contact with the whole system.
(assuming that the radiator is/and always will be cooler then the system)
circulating coolant through a radiator will radiate heat off until the temp of the coolant coming back to the block is as hot as the block.
fastest means of cooling the block will be to lower the temp of returning water to the block.
fastest means of cooling the water returning is to keep the water conducting heat the fastest.
since water conducts heat based on temp gradient by time in contact and the water is always in contact with the block/radiator/system the fastest means of cooling the system off will be to circulate the water the fastest up until the temp of the water returning from the block is equal to the temp leaving to/or into the block, all assuming of course the temp of air is lower then radiator.
I do here note that pressure (psi) plays a role in the temp gradient (Kj/sec). I do not know however if it is linear, geometric, or for that matter the exact relation. hence, i can not derive if increasing pressure will increase overall temp fall because pressure increase is an effect of flow rate being resisted. I can find it I THINK in my old physics book, im to lazy though.
MY VOTE IS FOR FLOW RATE, FIRST!!
liquids are for all intense and purposes conducting energy by means of conduction.
liquids in the closed system of the engine are ALWAYS in contact with the whole system.
(assuming that the radiator is/and always will be cooler then the system)
circulating coolant through a radiator will radiate heat off until the temp of the coolant coming back to the block is as hot as the block.
fastest means of cooling the block will be to lower the temp of returning water to the block.
fastest means of cooling the water returning is to keep the water conducting heat the fastest.
since water conducts heat based on temp gradient by time in contact and the water is always in contact with the block/radiator/system the fastest means of cooling the system off will be to circulate the water the fastest up until the temp of the water returning from the block is equal to the temp leaving to/or into the block, all assuming of course the temp of air is lower then radiator.
I do here note that pressure (psi) plays a role in the temp gradient (Kj/sec). I do not know however if it is linear, geometric, or for that matter the exact relation. hence, i can not derive if increasing pressure will increase overall temp fall because pressure increase is an effect of flow rate being resisted. I can find it I THINK in my old physics book, im to lazy though.
MY VOTE IS FOR FLOW RATE, FIRST!!
[Modified by Lone Ranger, 7:31 PM 11/13/2003]
















