Let me get this straight; The difference between 32 and 32b is basically the VATS, are there other differences? Can an 86 bin be read in 32b? how about an 87-88 bin in 32? 6e is just for 89's with no cold start injector right? I am having some trouble with my ECU files. I have one labeled 32b but it doesnt seem to be reading my (downloaded) bin correctly. Can someone provide a known working 32 and 32b ECU file that will work with tunerpro? Please send to SBNova@Yahoo.com. Thanks!

 

I sent you two known good files that work in Tuner Cat. I would think that they should work fine in Tuner Pro if Tuner Pro has the correct definition to work with a 32 and 32b ECM.

While it seems to open a file OK. I compared what I seen with Tuner Pro and TunerCat. I see seveal differences between the what I see in the tables such as the MAF calibration tables. So I would tend to beleive that you can't edit a 32 or 32B file with Tuner Pros 6e ECU file. Doing so may cause corruption of your BIN.

I compared a 6E file between the two programs and they are a perfect match. So to me it seems that TunerPros 6E ECU file isn't compatible with the 32 or 32B ECM files. Unless you have a modified ECU file that would work with the 32 and 32B files I wouldn't use the TunerPro program to edit the BINs.


[Modified by tjwong, 9:20 AM 1/14/2004]

 

The 32 and 32b are different creatures than the 6e. You can not read 32 or 32b correctly using a 6e definition file.... do not even try it. If you have tunercat, get a 32 or 32b definition file from them to read it. I am unsure if anyone has created an .ecu file for 32 or 32b. The author of tunerpro has a very nice 6e .ecu file.

You could switch you vehicle to 6e code and use the arap bin or apyp (corvette 6-spd) bin.

 

Ok I have decided to run with the 6E ECU/bin. But heres a new question; (maybe I should make a new post for this??) anyway heres the Q- I have a 4+3 and would really like to keep the OD comp. controlled. I looked at the APYP in 6E, and looked at a few 4+3 bins in 32B. Maybe its just the hac, but the only difference I see in either of these vs an automatic bin is the manual trans checked. How does the earlier bin/ecu control OD activation?? Would it use the TCC output? Do I tune the od activation with the TCC tables?? BTW I am planning to use tunerpro, and I am using the new 6Ev11 ecu.

 

You didn't say which ecm you have so looked at your profile, it says 85 corvette so i assume you upgraded to the 165 ecm? maybe you've posted somewhere else about it, nothing wrong with 32b cal.

 

I have an 85, but I am switching to a 165 in the next day or so. I have viewed several bins with several ECU files in Tunerpro, and it just looks like the 6E has the most variables. There also seems to be good support (for a free program) and it has the RT ability too. Im just not sure how the 4+3 will like it.

 

Having the most variables doesn't mean much since you don't touch 90% of them anyways. The 32b cal has the BPW fuel vs load which is kinda similiar to VE tables for a SD ecm. Some have had alot of success using this table, 6E doesn't have it. (uncheck base P.W. calibration method to use table) Just a thought

 

I am new at tuning, but I certainly agree that I will never touch many of the tables. Some of the ones in the tunerpro v11 just looked interesting, so I decided to give that one a shot first. Who knows I may try them both just to see. Thanks for the info about the 32B though. Its another table that "opens" when you uncheck the box??

 

No, just the ecm will not use that table unless you uncheck.

 

Got it, thanks for the tip!

 

Hey I just looked at the BPW vs Load in 32B, then I looked in 6E v11 (didnt check the older versions) and there is a table called "open loop AFR% change vs LV8", wouldnt this be quite similiar?? Maybe the 32B table adjusts for closed loop, and is more specific (by specifying specicific pulse width corrections), but the 6E version looks pretty straightforward changing AFR by %'s? Have you seen this and whats your thoughts? I guess the AFR as computed by a NB O2 would throw it off too.....

 

open loop table is not the same as the 32b table.

 

The 32B 'closed loop' table overrides the O2 sensor? Isn't closed loop based on open loop parameters then modified by O2 feedback? I've heard more about open vs. closed loop tables recently, but with GMECM and DIYEFI out of comission, I'm out of the loop.

 

No it overrides the calulated BPW so that you specify it, O2 is still in affect.