C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Turbo efficiency question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 01:53 PM
  #1  
mn_vette's Avatar
mn_vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 79
From: Jackson MI
Default Turbo efficiency question

I'm just currious as to what happens when you try and force more air through a turbo charger outside it's effecieny level. Does it just take more horsepower to do it or does it heat up the compressed side more? both?

I'm not sure I'm wording the question correctly so we'll take an example. Here's a compressor map for you: http://www.turboneticsinc.com/compressor.html?comp=60-1

What happens if I have an engine big enough to move 550hp(~55 LB/min) at 8psi(roughly 1.5 on the scale) using this compressor? This would not be the ideal turbocharger for the application, but what if it was used anyways. What would be the downside of doing this?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 02:22 PM
  #2  
Baldturbofreak's Avatar
Baldturbofreak
Drifting
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,637
Likes: 2
From: Honeoye Ny
Default Re: Turbo efficiency question (mn_vette)

It will go into choke. Choke is the extreme right side of the map. the compressor cannot supply you with the flow at the requested boost level so compressor speed rapidly rises (as do intake temps) until either detonation takes you or the wheel explodes. That is the most extreme case, a little into choke isn't ok, but it's not really gonna compromise anything. Deep into choke and you get the above. Go to http://www.Turbobygarrett.com They have alotta info in the tech section of the catalog.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 03:36 PM
  #3  
mn_vette's Avatar
mn_vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 79
From: Jackson MI
Default Re: Turbo efficiency question (Baldturbofreak)

Will it still choke if you are under the maximum flow of the compressor?? Or should I say will the choke kill it if it is still under the maximum flow of the compressor?

I would think increasing the amount of boost would help, but then you also increase the amount of airflow needed. Is there a way around this besides buying a new turbo.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 10:20 PM
  #4  
lcvette's Avatar
lcvette
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 3
From: Wilmington NC
Default Re: Turbo efficiency question (mn_vette)

MN... your going to need to get a turbo that will not go into choke.. you can bleed some pressure off the exhaust side wheel with a large enough wastegate, but once the exhaust pressure builds to a point where it outflows the gate, it will continue to overspeed the compressor wheel.. is this for your car? is this the turbo you had before? you considering going back to the ole turbo setup? im right there with ya.. i have been looking at this motor and the procharger and the motor and the turbo on the shelf... its mind boggling!

if its any help, the guys on the F-body forums are running single T66 or T76 hairdryers with some very impressive results! I am considering going to a T66 ballbearing wheel and a mid mount behind the passengerside seat with some modification to the rear hatch area for some extra room. would be pretty stealth.. i am shooting for a conservative 550-600 rwhp. not gonna get too greedy just want something different and can't get turbos out of my head!

Chris

Good luck,

Chris


[Modified by lcvette, 10:24 PM 1/20/2004]
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 10:53 PM
  #5  
mn_vette's Avatar
mn_vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 79
From: Jackson MI
Default Re: Turbo efficiency question (lcvette)

LC,

Yeah, that turbo stuff is back in my head. I re-examined my turbo header and noticed at three of the exhaust ports that there was carbon build up in one direction or another, ie exhaust leaks. So I'm going to get the header plate milled down flat. It looks like it got warped when it was welded up. I'm also going to build a cross over pipe. I picked up a welder from Home Depot the other day, its back ordered now, but when I get it I'll start practicing.

I was hoping that the turbo would be ok for a little while. And I think I'll still use it and just limit my rpm and I should be ok. I've been looking and I also think that there is enough room to put a T series in there, but I won't be sure until I get the pipes built in there. But a little clue, all the T66 through T72 turbos cost the same from turbonetics, or who ever you get them from. So, step up that bigger compressor, the maps show it'll have better airflow at low boost.

If you've got some links to the f-body turbos that I could check out that would be cool, it's always nice to see what other people have done so I don't have to re-invent the wheel.


[Modified by mn_vette, 4:02 AM 1/21/2004]
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #6  
lcvette's Avatar
lcvette
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 3
From: Wilmington NC
Default Re: Turbo efficiency question (mn_vette)

http://web.camaross.com/forums/forum...?s=&forumid=10

check out the forced induction section here and on LS1Tech, they both have some very experienceced radicals on there that like to be different "turbos" for power adders. with some luck and some time i am sure that this forced induction section on thevette forum will be filled with more people to assist in the projects builds.. right now i am VERY thankful for the few brave who have dived in head first! good luck and if i can be of any assistance let me know!

Chris

PS.. this is a great site for calculating and plotting your motors specifics on soem of Garrets/turbonetics more popular turbos.
http://www.smokemup.com/auto_math/turbo_size2.php


here is a map of what my modded engine would be close to with the 62-1 let me know what you guys think! this is a 355 8.7:1 CR, ported heads, turbo cam, and max of 14 psi boost.




[Modified by lcvette, 11:49 PM 1/20/2004]


[Modified by lcvette, 11:52 PM 1/20/2004]
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 01:58 PM
  #7  
mn_vette's Avatar
mn_vette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,293
Likes: 79
From: Jackson MI
Default Re: Turbo efficiency question (lcvette)

Thanks for the links. My 396 with no intercooler should be ok at 8 psi and 5500 rpm according to what smokeemup says. but if I get the new heads and an intercooler I somehow doubt that turbo will still work. Atleast it should give me some nice midrange torque :D I guess we try it and see what happens.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 10:09 PM
  #8  
lcvette's Avatar
lcvette
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 3
From: Wilmington NC
Default Re: Turbo efficiency question (mn_vette)

MN,

with a set of ported heads and intake yada yada yada.. you will be changing your volumetric efficiency.. so try putting in something closer to 90-95% in this category. this should show some change in where it plots your points across the compressor map.. usually will be a bad thing if your borderline already. give it a shot....

Chris
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Turbo efficiency question

Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 AM.

story-0
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-3
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE