When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
lobe separation 109.3
valve overlap -30.5 crank degree
centerline int 105.3 atdc /exh 113.3 btdc,
duration int 181.8 crank degree/exh 194.2,
peak cam lift int .233/exh .255,
peak valve lift int .362/.373exh,
lift at tdc int .0199/.0198 exh.
dur at .050 int. 181.8/exh .194.2
what would this cam do in a 5.7. what is this cam set up for? The 109.3 lobe sepation is quite low possible giving a rough idle but being the lift numbers are low maybe not. What do you all think about this cam and what would it be good for?
Waaay too many extraneous numbers jumbled in there to make any sense of. What *I* noticed was, " valve overlap -30.5 crank degree ". Is that, negative 30 1/2 degrees??? If it really refers to 30* of overlap, then "lope" won't be a problem Good luck, and...
If that 181.8 is the .050 number, then it's a very, very short duration camshaft. A lot shorter than even the stock TPI camshaft.
I suspect it is for something like a 305 - Three-Oh-Five - or maybe even something smaller in displacement, like a 283 or, what was the other little guy, a 262.
You can post your question on the ThirdGen.org board because some of those guys have Three-Oh-Five engines in their 'F' bodies.
That's exactly what I thought about it but the 109.3 had me confused. A cam with higher number like a 112 or 116 would be more of a radical cam? PS it would make an ugly lamb even.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.