Improvement with Hooker LT's??
<gasp>
First, the emissions testing will kick you in the ***...
Second, get your earplugs in bulk. The interior resonance will be deafening.
Third, you will be poluting the air, and I just don't dig that. The cat's won't suck enough power to make the polution worth it.
Finally, any shop in their right mind would never remove cats... because the fines from the EPA are staggering.
2nd, get earplugs? Why are you acting like nobody has installed longtubes before? Many people on the board run longtubes and from what I hear, they love them.
3rd, you don't have to "dig" me polluting the air. Go tell the rest of the board members who aren't running cats that either.
You have successfully not answered any of my questions in my post. Thank you.


Second, get your earplugs in bulk. The interior resonance will be deafening.
I disagree. Especially with the stock Exhaust.


Make sure you also clean off all of the old gasket material with the new install. If you are getting your Hookers coated be sure to add the AIR provisions and O2 bungs before you do so. Good luck and you can PM me for any questions you may have too.
Nathan Plemmons is also I good guy to look for with Hooker questions.
Thanks.


Thanks.

Although I would probably need to add the LT-1 exhaust is a very good exhaust in stock form. Its not like a huge restriction or anything.
Gotta agree with Bogus to an extent. If you're gonna run a car in an emissions required area without cats, you're asking for trouble. Most of the people who do not comply do so because they know they can get away with it. My beef with the emissions testing is the inconsistency and the loopholes. For example I can tune my car perfectly and put bullet cats on it. It can pass the sniffer test and put out less pollutants than it did when it came from the factory, BUT since it doesn't have an EO number on it, I fail. Meanwhile some hoopty cadillac can come in and just barely squeak by on the emissions test, putting out 10 times more junk than mine does, but it passes because it still uses OEM equipment.
My argument is not with emissions, my argument is the standard by which it is judged. If they want to be serious about it than you should have to pass a tailpipe sniffer test for all the varying conditions. If you pass, you pass. It shouldn't matter how you do so. The fact that an OBDII car can pass perfectly just because the computer sees everything correctly is a complete joke. Get a clue and make the tests legitimate and make everybody play by the same rules and I'll gladly bring my car into compliance. Until then I'll just use a rake instead of a leaf blower and save on emissions that way.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Thanks.
LT1/4's don't pick up quite as much as the L98's, maybe you were expecting gains similar to those?
I agree with 15 rwhp. that's about a 20 chp gain? That's pretty good for a bolton methinks.
As far as removing cats my opinion varies... and you do alot of driving you should leave them on.
In my case, my Vette sees about 600 or 700 miles a year as a 'nice weather car.' I see no problem with removing the cats on mine.
On my daily driver which see's about 15,000 miles a year, the pollution control equipment should be on and in perfect working order (and is).
gotta have it loud! This is probably a phase I'll grow out of someday when I grow up.





Second, get your earplugs in bulk. The interior resonance will be deafening.

Last edited by Corvette Kid; Nov 23, 2004 at 05:11 PM.
2nd, get earplugs? Why are you acting like nobody has installed longtubes before? Many people on the board run longtubes and from what I hear, they love them.
3rd, you don't have to "dig" me polluting the air. Go tell the rest of the board members who aren't running cats that either.
You have successfully not answered any of my questions in my post. Thank you.
Oh, and thank you, and the other morons who feel they must **** up the air we breathe for a lousy 5 hp.
gotta have it loud! This is probably a phase I'll grow out of someday when I grow up. 
http://www.wku.edu/~nathan.plemons/s...en_headers.mp3
Gotta agree with Bogus to an extent. If you're gonna run a car in an emissions required area without cats, you're asking for trouble. Most of the people who do not comply do so because they know they can get away with it. My beef with the emissions testing is the inconsistency and the loopholes. For example I can tune my car perfectly and put bullet cats on it. It can pass the sniffer test and put out less pollutants than it did when it came from the factory, BUT since it doesn't have an EO number on it, I fail. Meanwhile some hoopty cadillac can come in and just barely squeak by on the emissions test, putting out 10 times more junk than mine does, but it passes because it still uses OEM equipment.
My argument is not with emissions, my argument is the standard by which it is judged. If they want to be serious about it than you should have to pass a tailpipe sniffer test for all the varying conditions. If you pass, you pass. It shouldn't matter how you do so. The fact that an OBDII car can pass perfectly just because the computer sees everything correctly is a complete joke. Get a clue and make the tests legitimate and make everybody play by the same rules and I'll gladly bring my car into compliance. Until then I'll just use a rake instead of a leaf blower and save on emissions that way.
But EO numbers don't effect the rest of the country... what bothers me is the lack of a federal mandate for testing... and compliance. How FL can get away with it (yea, I know, they have "cleaner" air, but those gases have to go somewhere), and how the polution problem is viewed as a local problem, not a national issue. Seems somehow unfair...
If every jurisdiction had simple sniff tests and visual inspections, then I think the national air quality, nay, the global air quality, would improve dramatically.
I am not professing that CARB is needed or required in its present beaurocratic mess of an existance. It needs to be revamped to address changes in technology... specifically, aftermarket technologies.
For example, if I wanted to run long tubes with high flow cats, just because they relocated the factory cats, I am illegal. however, if I was allowed to run this, under the onus of having to pass a sniff every year, then so be it, I would. It would be a fair exchange....
I believe that daily driven cars must be emissions legal. It is our CIVIC duty to make sure we are not making the environment any worse than it already is.
http://www.wku.edu/~nathan.plemons/s...en_headers.mp3











