When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Any reason you are changing Jay? Anyone else have TFS forced induction #'s to back up a change?
Going from the AFR's which are set for a 4:10 bore to a set for a 3:90 bore which I run. AFR's are 72CC and the TFS are 74CC. They are also 18 bolt hole pattern set for LSX based motors instead of 10.
Originally Posted by highpockets
Do you happen to have or would you be willing to post or PM before and after with your setup ? Any other changes or heads only ?
New turbos and wastegates as well. My old numbers are floating around somewhere. I don't expect much with the exception of my power delivery throughout the curve will be a smoother transition along with more up top.
Going from the AFR's which are set for a 4:10 bore to a set for a 3:90 bore which I run. AFR's are 72CC and the TFS are 74CC. They are also 18 bolt hole pattern set for LSX based motors instead of 10.
Well that makes sense. I thought the AFR225's were for 4.00 and above bore. You are 3.90 since you have stock block and run a bigger crank.
Now that we have more cars out there running FI.... What heads stand out?
This will be interesting I am anxious to see how many cars our there are over 800+ rwhp using LS6 heads. I have been using my WCCH LS6 heads for 6 years now...with a S/C and two different turbo kits.
This will be interesting I am anxious to see how many cars our there are over 800+ rwhp using LS6 heads. I have been using my WCCH LS6 heads for 6 years now...with a S/C and two different turbo kits.
830 rwhp here running worked LS6 heads with 18#'s for 1.5 years...no problems
This will be interesting I am anxious to see how many cars our there are over 800+ rwhp using LS6 heads.
Unless you need the thicker deck or are building a ***** deep race car I'm not sure there is really a point in most of the after-market cylinder heads. If you can plant 800 rwhp more power to you. At some point you have to ask yourself how much money do you want to spend to spin your tires.
This will be interesting I am anxious to see how many cars our there are over 800+ rwhp using LS6 heads. I have been using my WCCH LS6 heads for 6 years now...with a S/C and two different turbo kits.
Unless you need the thicker deck or are building a ***** deep race car I'm not sure there is really a point in most of the after-market cylinder heads. If you can plant 800 rwhp more power to you. At some point you have to ask yourself how much money do you want to spend to spin your tires.
Mark - That's the point that my tuner keeps trying to POUND into my head. I keep wanting to up the boost from 14# to 17# on my Stage 3 heads & when he told me that I MIGHT have some head lift, I've been considering the AFR's ( 205's on my small bore 383 cid F1-R ). I'm making 752 rwhp @ 14# & can spin the Pilot Sports @ 60 mph in third gear so he keeps asking me just how in the H*** I think I can plant the additional 80 rwhp that the extra 3# of boost should yield!!?? Your reply ALMOST makes me open my eyes to his/your point!!
Gene
Last edited by Mean Gene55; May 7, 2008 at 06:57 PM.
Reason: Add comment
he keeps asking me just how in the H*** I think I can plant the additional 80 rwhp that the extra 3# of boost should yield!!?? Your reply ALMOST makes me open my eyes to his/your point!!
It's your money, if you want to splurge on a trick set of after-market cylinder heads I say go for it. But I would caution you that you run the risk of making your car slower by adding additional power.
For example, I've tried turning up the boost a couple of times at the track and the car never went faster because the tires just went up in smoke.
Now, if I could ramp up the power with some sort of boost-by-gear type deal with the boost controller then I might see a better slip.
I say just enjoy what you have, but I don't want to be a hypocrite as I've swapped combos several times in search of more power, or just boredom.
I'm making 752 rwhp @ 14# & can spin the Pilot Sports @ 60 mph in third gear so he keeps asking me just how in the H*** I think I can plant the additional 80 rwhp that the extra 3# of boost should yield!!?? Your reply ALMOST makes me open my eyes to his/your point!!
Gene
Well try breaking 335 Nittos loose at 120mph... More power equals less traction and more distance between you and your lower horsepower opponent thats getting traction.
Well try breaking 335 Nittos loose at 120mph... More power equals less traction and more distance between you and your lower horsepower opponent thats getting traction.
Vince & Mark - Yes, it certainly DOES make sense. I remember the days of racing my '87 Lingenfelter 383 'Vette vs some Grand Nationals & I'd ALWAYS take them out of the hole because they'd spin. Sure, the smokey burnouts looked cool but while the crowd was cheering him I was putting some lengths on him!!
830 rwhp here running worked LS6 heads with 18#'s for 1.5 years...no problems
They work pretty good don't they.
Originally Posted by mdhmi
Unless you need the thicker deck or are building a ***** deep race car I'm not sure there is really a point in most of the after-market cylinder heads. If you can plant 800 rwhp more power to you. At some point you have to ask yourself how much money do you want to spend to spin your tires.
Yes the real advantage of the aftermarket heads are the improvements that are made when used with the N/A setups.
I think the fact that there are a couple of different turbo kits making over 800 rwhp with re-worked LS6 heads and on 346cids is proof that it is not as critical...just like having a big cam with FI doesn't mean as much...I'm still running the same cam 224/224 for the last 6 years as well.
I'm not trying to knock aftermarket heads and big cams...I agree that one can get to a hp level that is plenty high enough using reworked GM heads.
If I was running a NA setup...I really like the AFRs, All Pro, Eldebrock, and ETP heads. I don't even know which ones I would pick out of the above as they all have advantages.
I ran some 6.0L heads done by Futral Motorsports and Meaux Racing and my car NA made a best of 564rwhp/518rwtq on pump gas in my old F body. It was a 408ci setup. I held the 408ci hydraulic cammed dyno record for 2 years. Hell I can only think of one 427ci that put out better numbers back then. My numbers were verified on several dynos..
I am pretty sure flow can be duplicated by good porters. I cant imagine what my current heads could do in the hands of FMS/Meaux.
my 87 was a hooking machine... atr suspension kit and with mccrearys i would do high 1.50's on slicks i would nail the 1.50 mark never went 1.49...
i loved my gold type-t champion iron heads, john craig te-63, dequick front mount- houston down pipe...not much else and i was 11.20's @ 121 on 50/50 mix.
Originally Posted by Mean Gene55
Vince & Mark - Yes, it certainly DOES make sense. I remember the days of racing my '87 Lingenfelter 383 'Vette vs some Grand Nationals & I'd ALWAYS take them out of the hole because they'd spin. Sure, the smokey burnouts looked cool but while the crowd was cheering him I was putting some lengths on him!!
my 87 was a hooking machine... atr suspension kit and with mccrearys i would do high 1.50's on slicks i would nail the 1.50 mark never went 1.49...
i loved my gold type-t champion iron heads, john craig te-63, dequick front mount- houston down pipe...not much else and i was 11.20's @ 121 on 50/50 mix.
Barry - I didn't mean to imply that I WON all those races!! :o The GN's were fairly bulletproof & w/the right Duttweiler mods those things screamed!! I ended up installing a 125 hp NOS kit just to keep up w/some of them 'cause the dang TPI induction system ( even the modded LPE one ) ran out of breath around 5500 rpms.
Last edited by Mean Gene55; May 9, 2008 at 02:55 PM.
Reason: Add comment