Numbers low for Combo?
#1
CF Senior Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Numbers low for Combo?
Just finished off the Stage II Procharger install on a 98 Vert. Running 7-8 lbs boost with a 3.85 pulley, LS6 intake/80 mm BBK TB, LG street Series/no cats and AIS meth system. The car is running great but is outflowing the stock LS1 MAF which will be slated for replacement in the spring along with a FAST intake and 90 mm TB.
The meth is set to come on around 3 lbs. Final numbers are 479 RWHP and 448 RWTQ. Timing at WOT is around 18 deg. The motor is a stock LS1 otherwise. AFR is almost dead on 12.
I feel these numbers may be on the low side for the combo. Thinking they should be in the low 500's for RWHP and around 480 + for RWTQ. Is the stock heads/cam combo the culprit?
Any input from the FI experts would be greatly appreciated.
The meth is set to come on around 3 lbs. Final numbers are 479 RWHP and 448 RWTQ. Timing at WOT is around 18 deg. The motor is a stock LS1 otherwise. AFR is almost dead on 12.
I feel these numbers may be on the low side for the combo. Thinking they should be in the low 500's for RWHP and around 480 + for RWTQ. Is the stock heads/cam combo the culprit?
Any input from the FI experts would be greatly appreciated.
#2
Melting Slicks
I just had the Vortech S trim installed on my 01 Z...
The numbers were 600/512 with a custom grind cam, fast 90/90, ARH's, stock heads and no meth....
I'm a FI noob so I'm not really qualified to make comments on your installation and set up....but the #'s do seem a bit low...
I'll sit back and on this one.....
What kind of dyno was it ??
Bubba.
The numbers were 600/512 with a custom grind cam, fast 90/90, ARH's, stock heads and no meth....
I'm a FI noob so I'm not really qualified to make comments on your installation and set up....but the #'s do seem a bit low...
I'll sit back and on this one.....
What kind of dyno was it ??
Bubba.
Last edited by BUBBAS 01Z06; 11-02-2008 at 04:58 PM.
#3
Melting Slicks
Is this on an auto?
What type of Dyno?
If an auto, it seems a bit low. If stick, I think it's low.
When you said the AFR is dead at 12, 12:1 right? Is that on the Meth? To me that is lean while on Meth. Most will say the basic rule is a point lower while on meth, so if you were to run 11:1 on gas, add meth, you should be 10:1.
Just my opinion though.
Dan
What type of Dyno?
If an auto, it seems a bit low. If stick, I think it's low.
When you said the AFR is dead at 12, 12:1 right? Is that on the Meth? To me that is lean while on Meth. Most will say the basic rule is a point lower while on meth, so if you were to run 11:1 on gas, add meth, you should be 10:1.
Just my opinion though.
Dan
#6
Tech Contributor
A good blower cam will make more difference than a set of ported heads. ECS cam is very popular. I have the A&A cam and love it. Arun at CDNperformance has good cam grinds as well. There are many vendors to choose from. EPP, Dallas Performance, Canadian Performance, A&A, and ECS. Give one of them a call and they will determine the best cam for your driving style and performance desires.
#7
CF Senior Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Thanks for all the info guys. Sorry, I did forget to include that it is a Mn6 with stock sizing wheels and that the car was tuned for meth with the AFR being 11.8 - 12.0:1.
The car previously made 337 RWHP and 351 RWTQ with LG headers, X-pipe, no cats, LS6 intake, 80 mm BBK TB and a VR2 Vararam.
Both the runs prior to and after the supercharger install were made on the same Dynojet for comparison.
Is it possible that out flowing the stock LS1 MAF is killing the top end HP?
I will post a dyno graph of the run as soon as I figure out how to copy it.
The car previously made 337 RWHP and 351 RWTQ with LG headers, X-pipe, no cats, LS6 intake, 80 mm BBK TB and a VR2 Vararam.
Both the runs prior to and after the supercharger install were made on the same Dynojet for comparison.
Is it possible that out flowing the stock LS1 MAF is killing the top end HP?
I will post a dyno graph of the run as soon as I figure out how to copy it.
#8
Team Owner
Seems a bit low to me. I'm making the same and my only mod is headers and the D1SC @ 7-8psi(still rocking the LS1 intake manifold and no meth on 91' Octane).
#9
Melting Slicks
Thanks for all the info guys. Sorry, I did forget to include that it is a Mn6 with stock sizing wheels and that the car was tuned for meth with the AFR being 11.8 - 12.0:1.
The car previously made 337 RWHP and 351 RWTQ with LG headers, X-pipe, no cats, LS6 intake, 80 mm BBK TB and a VR2 Vararam.
Both the runs prior to and after the supercharger install were made on the same Dynojet for comparison.
Is it possible that out flowing the stock LS1 MAF is killing the top end HP?
I will post a dyno graph of the run as soon as I figure out how to copy it.
The car previously made 337 RWHP and 351 RWTQ with LG headers, X-pipe, no cats, LS6 intake, 80 mm BBK TB and a VR2 Vararam.
Both the runs prior to and after the supercharger install were made on the same Dynojet for comparison.
Is it possible that out flowing the stock LS1 MAF is killing the top end HP?
I will post a dyno graph of the run as soon as I figure out how to copy it.
Dan
#11
Team Owner
Just finished off the Stage II Procharger install on a 98 Vert. Running 7-8 lbs boost with a 3.85 pulley, LS6 intake/80 mm BBK TB, LG street Series/no cats and AIS meth system. The car is running great but is outflowing the stock LS1 MAF which will be slated for replacement in the spring along with a FAST intake and 90 mm TB.
The meth is set to come on around 3 lbs. Final numbers are 479 RWHP and 448 RWTQ. Timing at WOT is around 18 deg. The motor is a stock LS1 otherwise. AFR is almost dead on 12.
I feel these numbers may be on the low side for the combo. Thinking they should be in the low 500's for RWHP and around 480 + for RWTQ. Is the stock heads/cam combo the culprit?
Any input from the FI experts would be greatly appreciated.
The meth is set to come on around 3 lbs. Final numbers are 479 RWHP and 448 RWTQ. Timing at WOT is around 18 deg. The motor is a stock LS1 otherwise. AFR is almost dead on 12.
I feel these numbers may be on the low side for the combo. Thinking they should be in the low 500's for RWHP and around 480 + for RWTQ. Is the stock heads/cam combo the culprit?
Any input from the FI experts would be greatly appreciated.
Got your PM too!
The numbers seem a little low for your set-up! so here goes:
1. The stock MAF - If you have not changed to the 2 BAR MAP sensor you need to - our MAF's do not have enough table for the SuperChargers amount of flow.
AC DELCO Part# 213-1631 or GM Part#12580698
2.A4 ? Torque Converter - Stock or Stall?
3. Which rear gears? MN6 3.42's or A4 with 3.15's or 2.73's
It should be over 500 RWHP at least! We did one on my buddies 2004 STOCK LS1 Vette and he put down 525 RWHP and 490 RWTQ and it was completely stock MN6 with full Kooks exhaust system and Meth.
Do not use the stock MAF but go to the 2 BAR MAP sensor set-up and you'll get the desired results - It will need to be re-tuned but it'll be worth it.
Let me know when the graph is up too!
Thanks,Matt
#12
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Port Arthur, Texas 77642
Posts: 8,475
Received 331 Likes
on
241 Posts
In my beginning with only catback & cats deleted, CAI, Hypertech "canned" tune I made 337rwhp on my 99 MN6. With AFR 205's, Kooks LT's and the baby blower cam in my sig power moved up to 397rwhp. Then a couple months later the LS6 intake & A&A Vortech S-Trim system with 7-8psi was installed and the power jumped to 606rwhp
FWIW for everyone that may not know, the camshaft specs on a 98 are .479/.472-207*/198*-117lsa.
Good Luck with Your Car
FWIW for everyone that may not know, the camshaft specs on a 98 are .479/.472-207*/198*-117lsa.
Good Luck with Your Car
#13
Team Owner
Plus the 98's operating system is limited, so a 2 BAR MAP sensor would do well in his case as it did for me, being I also have a '98.
It takes it past the stock MAF table so there is "NO" guessing at what the VE tables etc should be at, as opposed to using the 2 BAR MAP
and being able to tune for the best HP and TQ under BOOST.
Thanks,Matt
#14
Melting Slicks
The 98's MAF's suck in comparison to the later model MAF's on the Vette's!
Plus the 98's operating system is limited, so a 2 BAR MAP sensor would do well in his case as it did for me, being I also have a '98.
It takes it past the stock MAF table so there is "NO" guessing at what the VE tables etc should be at, as opposed to using the 2 BAR MAP
and being able to tune for the best HP and TQ under BOOST.
Thanks,Matt
Plus the 98's operating system is limited, so a 2 BAR MAP sensor would do well in his case as it did for me, being I also have a '98.
It takes it past the stock MAF table so there is "NO" guessing at what the VE tables etc should be at, as opposed to using the 2 BAR MAP
and being able to tune for the best HP and TQ under BOOST.
Thanks,Matt
Dan