When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Im currently at 646/585 with 10.2lbs at 6700rpm, limiter set at 6800... cam is a 222/230 114+2.. With a stock ls6 and 75mm throttle body... would a ported LS2 manifold and 90mm pick me up anything/be worth my time?
Im currently at 646/585 with 10.2lbs at 6700rpm, limiter set at 6800... cam is a 222/230 114+2.. With a stock ls6 and 75mm throttle body... would a ported LS2 manifold and 90mm pick me up anything/be worth my time?
Arun, ran the 75mm TB for the longest time befor going to the ls2 90mm TB. His car did great on the smaller. But you can pick one up at almost nothing. Robert
Ok good deal... so is that a bolt on deal? I know I'll need the 90tb and the caspers harness... but will the ls1/6 rails bolt on with my 60's? And if ya'll had to guess what would I be gaining?
Im still on stock rails... on some posts I was reading something about bigger o rings for the injectors, and spacers for the rails?? I dunno lol im slightly confused on it... it just sounded like a lot for a little is all.
Must not have been that thorough on your research. The FAST is setup for an LS2 so you will need new rails for that too.
Just took a FAST off of my car when I put the blower on.... bolted together without issue. If you're talking about a 102, then you're correct. I had a Vengeance 92.
The 102 is the only one worth having. Anything older will leak with boost. Some people have problems with the 102 even, although FAST claims it's tested to 61 psi
just not worth it.. ls6 manifolds have made over 900 on FI. ive also seen reputable ported ls2 manifolds dyno only 3-5 hp over a 75mm/stock ls6 manifold. this has been beat to absolute death on ls1 tech
just not worth it.. Ls6 manifolds have made over 900 on fi. Ive also seen reputable ported ls2 manifolds dyno only 3-5 hp over a 75mm/stock ls6 manifold. This has been beat to absolute death on ls1 tech
Its FI! Hard to beat an LS6 intake. By far the strongest factory intake manifold, they were expensive to manufacture. Thats why GM tried the LS2. Looking for gains and there were some N/A but not much. Most were do to the larger TB and the gains were up top not though out the power band. But you will see minimal gains from an intake swap alone. and Price per HP, your better off putting a smaller pulley on there if you can etc... GL!
Its FI! Hard to beat an LS6 intake. By far the strongest factory intake manifold, they were expensive to manufacture. Thats why GM tried the LS2. Looking for gains and there were some N/A but not much. Most were do to the larger TB and the gains were up top not though out the power band. But you will see minimal gains from an intake swap alone. and Price per HP, your better off putting a smaller pulley on there if you can etc... GL!
I've never seen someone gain power by switching from an LS6 to an LS2 intake on a naturally aspirated motor. TB aside, the LS6 intake is a superior design.
I've never seen someone gain power by switching from an LS6 to an LS2 intake on a naturally aspirated motor. TB aside, the LS6 intake is a superior design.
you probably wont on a NA engine but you port a LS2 and they seem to flow better than same ported LS6. Actually had numbers to back this up back in the day but I lost em. the 90 mm opening of the LS2 does have an effect on capability!! vs the 76mm opening of the LS6.
you probably wont on a NA engine but you port a LS2 and they seem to flow better than same ported LS6. Actually had numbers to back this up back in the day but I lost em. the 90 mm opening of the LS2 does have an effect on capability!! vs the 76mm opening of the LS6.
Your just saying that because you have one hahaha...