My CHITBOX
01-20-2019, 09:34 PM
#81
I am back turdy porpoise. first of all go ***** yourself. I can buy you like a cheap *****. the only janitor biatch here is your mama. send me 500 bucks and I will send you my dyno sheet dork. lots of chitheads here so I dont owe anybody anything. I have nothing to hide chithead. I am upgrading my fuel system just to be safe. I was told after my tune that I was out of injector and pump. injectors bought and pumps on the way. I actually want to fatten up the tune giving up horsepower which is fine with me. After my deployment is over I scheduled a trip to go see the twin turbo engine. Have a buyer for my c3. more money.. more money.
01-20-2019, 11:14 PM
#82
Quote:
Originally Posted by edram454 
sad to hear that you think that horsepower sales has a number happy dyno. Let me tell you it doesnt. I am not defending Jeremy Preston at all. I know his dyno is not nearly as number happy as a dynojet dyno. Mustang dynos usually make people very unhappy and people flee from these historically low number producing dynos. I have never been fortunate to have a street corvette dyno so high. I had a somewhat famous 1200 horsepower fox mustang in the late 90's in south florida and I could not buy a race. I even went to ft.lauderdale and nobody would take a bite either. I had a supergas and supercomp license and ran my mustang to a 8.70 at 158 in quarter mile in reading pennsylvania. I had 85k in that car and had the engine custom built by Crawford Performance by Ronnie Crawford. Engine was tuned in Detroit by John Meany at DFI. I dont use dyno numbers as race numbers. it is just a way to tune a car period. Some people said that 470 was too high for a n/a z06. Ok, now on another dyno it pulls 699 rwhp and 547 torque and someone thinks that this mustang dyno is liberal with its numbers. their are many reasons way one car can beat another car with more power,, gearing, transmission gearing, torque curve,... there is a youtube video with a supercharged c5 making more power versus and na c6 z06 and the c6 z06 grinds its way up the rpm range and has longer gear runs and pulls away from the c5 in most of the races. there is one race where the c5 has a rolling start form 40mph for both cars, puts the c5 immediatley in its power band and wins that race. put both cars on the same dyno and give me a number. put your car on lashways dyno and see what it says. Josh at Lashway has tuned many 1000 horse cars and he warned me about low horsepower readings on his dyno. It pulled 699 at 6450 rpm. dyno sheet available. everyone has an opinion and thats ok. I am happy with my cars performance and notice I was not looking for any dyno heroics. I even told Josh to be safe and not go for the gusto on my car. I even told him I am not interested in upgrading the fuel system or injectors. Mustang dynos are notorious for giving low horsepower numbers. My car has been on both. Both Jeremy and Josh have raced and driven very fast cars. Both said my car runs very hard. Knowing I still have another 40 horsepower available with fuel and injector upgrades I wont be upgrading any time soon. My car is fast enough
.
sad to hear that you think that horsepower sales has a number happy dyno. Let me tell you it doesnt. I am not defending Jeremy Preston at all. I know his dyno is not nearly as number happy as a dynojet dyno. Mustang dynos usually make people very unhappy and people flee from these historically low number producing dynos. I have never been fortunate to have a street corvette dyno so high. I had a somewhat famous 1200 horsepower fox mustang in the late 90's in south florida and I could not buy a race. I even went to ft.lauderdale and nobody would take a bite either. I had a supergas and supercomp license and ran my mustang to a 8.70 at 158 in quarter mile in reading pennsylvania. I had 85k in that car and had the engine custom built by Crawford Performance by Ronnie Crawford. Engine was tuned in Detroit by John Meany at DFI. I dont use dyno numbers as race numbers. it is just a way to tune a car period. Some people said that 470 was too high for a n/a z06. Ok, now on another dyno it pulls 699 rwhp and 547 torque and someone thinks that this mustang dyno is liberal with its numbers. their are many reasons way one car can beat another car with more power,, gearing, transmission gearing, torque curve,... there is a youtube video with a supercharged c5 making more power versus and na c6 z06 and the c6 z06 grinds its way up the rpm range and has longer gear runs and pulls away from the c5 in most of the races. there is one race where the c5 has a rolling start form 40mph for both cars, puts the c5 immediatley in its power band and wins that race. put both cars on the same dyno and give me a number. put your car on lashways dyno and see what it says. Josh at Lashway has tuned many 1000 horse cars and he warned me about low horsepower readings on his dyno. It pulled 699 at 6450 rpm. dyno sheet available. everyone has an opinion and thats ok. I am happy with my cars performance and notice I was not looking for any dyno heroics. I even told Josh to be safe and not go for the gusto on my car. I even told him I am not interested in upgrading the fuel system or injectors. Mustang dynos are notorious for giving low horsepower numbers. My car has been on both. Both Jeremy and Josh have raced and driven very fast cars. Both said my car runs very hard. Knowing I still have another 40 horsepower available with fuel and injector upgrades I wont be upgrading any time soon. My car is fast enough.
Now that you have come back too insult people. I thought I would post the numbers you quoted for your car. A dyno sheet like you said you have does not exist as the math does not support any such dyno sheet, ( mathematically impossible) unless you take out your crayons and fabricate a dyno sheet.
Last edited by glennd; 01-20-2019 at 11:20 PM.
01-20-2019, 11:28 PM
#84
what will you give me if I call you out?? I have pdf file that josh gave me along with a printed dyno sheet right off his dyno. I was their when he printed it. are you ready to put your money on it?? it is exactly as I stated. rework your math because I have that dyno information logged on pdf file. dont be so dumb and commit yourself once someone emphatically tells you and offers up the shop that did it etc... If so many people had not talked so much chit I was about ready to post it until some people started to try to insult me. I have no problem insulting back, that is easy. If you dont like my dyno numbers then its your problem. It is what it is. put your money where your mouth is and back it up with money. I might as well make some money for nothing. If you are not willing to wager then shut your trap.
01-20-2019, 11:31 PM
#85
Drifting
Are you still standing by 699hp @ 6450 rpm and 547 peak tq?
01-20-2019, 11:36 PM
#86
why? because some idiot turdy porpoise decided to try to insult me so I felt obligated to come back. plus this can get boring with this sausage fest of love over some guys crap car. some guys are out of touch and know nothing about corvette history.Give the respect and kudos to those men who were responsible for the corvette to exist. maybe my candid personality can wake up this dead web site. weather is nice in florida. feel sorry for those northern guys who are not chitheads.
01-20-2019, 11:43 PM
#88
look, my dyno numbers are not that exciting. I dont know the fascination with them. I just reported what the dyno printout says. I could not have cared if it was 600 or 699. I would have accepted whatever the dyno said. I read of a guy in this forum that put down 650 on a mustang dyno with 60 pound injectors and a stock pump. It was funny because nobody motherphucked his numbers and totally accepted it. again I dont give a chit. but this is fact on this forum. later got to sleep and get ready to work another 14 hour day.
01-20-2019, 11:45 PM
#89
Drifting
What RPM does peak torque occur at?
Do you know the equation to calculate HP based off torque and RPM? As has been stated a few times already, the info you posted.... it does not add up, 699 hp is not possible with that amount of torque at 6450 rpm.
So either
1.) You're making it up
2.) You don't know how to read a dyno sheet
Why not just post the dyno sheet if it will silence all the haters?
Love,
Dummy
Do you know the equation to calculate HP based off torque and RPM? As has been stated a few times already, the info you posted.... it does not add up, 699 hp is not possible with that amount of torque at 6450 rpm.
So either
1.) You're making it up
2.) You don't know how to read a dyno sheet
Why not just post the dyno sheet if it will silence all the haters?
Love,
Dummy
01-20-2019, 11:49 PM
#90
But you started this thread https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...o-numbers.html to show off your dyno numbers. So obviously you cared.
01-21-2019, 12:18 AM
#91
Le Mans Master
because math, genius! that's what we've been trying to tell you this whole time... it's just been interspersed with tons of side-bar shenanigans.
sorry, but i'm just gonna spoon-feed this one.
horsepower = (torque * RPM) ÷ 5252
plain & simple; that's all there is to it... so now lets look at your claim
699 = (torque * 6450) ÷ 5252 will tell us how much torque is required at 6450rpm to produce 699 horsepower.
3,671,148 = torque * 6450
569.17 = torque
that's empirical math (not opinion), but it's funny... that's a bit more than your supposed dyno sheet says is the maximum torque produced by your car.
furthermore, normal LS motors don't produce max torque at 6400rpm either. it's usually somewhere around 5500 with a good top end (maybe 5000 with less work done). that said, with torque on the decline for about 1000rpm, then it'd have to be making closer to 600 peak torque to end up with 569.
does that make more sense now?
What RPM does peak torque occur at?
Do you know the equation to calculate HP based off torque and RPM? As has been stated a few times already, the info you posted.... it does not add up, 699 hp is not possible with that amount of torque at 6450 rpm.
So either
1.) You're making it up
2.) You don't know how to read a dyno sheet
Why not just post the dyno sheet if it will silence all the haters?
Love,
Dummy
Do you know the equation to calculate HP based off torque and RPM? As has been stated a few times already, the info you posted.... it does not add up, 699 hp is not possible with that amount of torque at 6450 rpm.
So either
1.) You're making it up
2.) You don't know how to read a dyno sheet
Why not just post the dyno sheet if it will silence all the haters?
Love,
Dummy
horsepower = (torque * RPM) ÷ 5252
plain & simple; that's all there is to it... so now lets look at your claim
699 = (torque * 6450) ÷ 5252 will tell us how much torque is required at 6450rpm to produce 699 horsepower.
3,671,148 = torque * 6450
569.17 = torque
that's empirical math (not opinion), but it's funny... that's a bit more than your supposed dyno sheet says is the maximum torque produced by your car.
furthermore, normal LS motors don't produce max torque at 6400rpm either. it's usually somewhere around 5500 with a good top end (maybe 5000 with less work done). that said, with torque on the decline for about 1000rpm, then it'd have to be making closer to 600 peak torque to end up with 569.
does that make more sense now?
01-21-2019, 12:25 AM
#92
Le Mans Master
and as mathed out before, even if we go out on a limb & pretend your car made it's max claimed torque (547) at 6450, here's how that works out:
hp = (547 * 6450) ÷ 5252
hp = 3,528,150 ÷ 5252
hp = 671.8
that's still almost 30hp shy of your claim.
hp = (547 * 6450) ÷ 5252
hp = 3,528,150 ÷ 5252
hp = 671.8
that's still almost 30hp shy of your claim.
01-21-2019, 01:03 PM
#95
Drifting
So it was clearly at 6700+ rpm. I'm glad we can finally clear that up and confirm lil eddie can't read a dyno.
Sorry OP for your thread going sideways.
Sorry OP for your thread going sideways.
Last edited by aaronc7; 01-21-2019 at 01:04 PM.
01-21-2019, 01:23 PM
#97
E D, I hope you aren't mad you didnt make any money off your dyno sheet. Too many internet sleuths out there lol.
Last edited by ascastil; 01-21-2019 at 01:25 PM.
01-21-2019, 01:38 PM
#99
Race Director
Member Since: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 10,426
Received 1,261 Likes
on
1,056 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (performance mods)
C5 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
gofundme lol
01-21-2019, 01:48 PM
#100
Melting Slicks
I am back turdy porpoise. first of all go ***** yourself. I can buy you like a cheap *****. the only janitor biatch here is your mama. send me 500 bucks and I will send you my dyno sheet dork. lots of chitheads here so I dont owe anybody anything. I have nothing to hide chithead. I am upgrading my fuel system just to be safe. I was told after my tune that I was out of injector and pump. injectors bought and pumps on the way. I actually want to fatten up the tune giving up horsepower which is fine with me. After my deployment is over I scheduled a trip to go see the twin turbo engine. Have a buyer for my c3. more money.. more money.
Nobody believes you made that power, nobody believes you make good money and nobody believes you have half a brain.
So you're deployed but you work for a Fortune 500? Why do you feel the need to continue telling us what you're doing with your life? Nobody cares if you're going to see "the twin turbo engine." You aren't special(except in that special education way).
You act like you're 6 years old, calling people poop names, dork, geek, etc. Your words can't offend me because that would mean that I cared about your opinion. I care less about what you think or say than I do about your imaginary drag mustang.
The way you keep referencing how much of a big baller you are leads me to believe you're compensating for a tiny crankshaft.
Last edited by Turpid porpoise; 01-21-2019 at 05:06 PM.