When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It can't be the only change if you want hp. I LOST 3hp adding the K&N to a modded air box with only a cat-back change. Other changes and/or tuning are needed. It is not a hp gainer by itself.
It can't be the only change if you want hp. I LOST 3hp adding the K&N to a modded air box with only a cat-back change. Other changes and/or tuning are needed. It is not a hp gainer by itself.
More air through = more dirt through....
But does K&N let more air through???
If I remember the data correctly,there was a post about a year ago with independent engineering data that showed when new paper outflowed K&N, but when dirty, K&N outflowed paper....
The jury is out, but in the interim, I used Both K&N and Fram Air Hog filters....
More air through = more dirt through....
But does K&N let more air through???
If I remember the data correctly,there was a post about a year ago with independent engineering data that showed when new paper outflowed K&N, but when dirty, K&N outflowed paper....
The jury is out, but in the interim, I used Both K&N and Fram Air Hog filters....
More air through = more dirt through....
But does K&N let more air through???
If I remember the data correctly,there was a post about a year ago with independent engineering data that showed when new paper outflowed K&N, but when dirty, K&N outflowed paper....
The jury is out, but in the interim, I used Both K&N and Fram Air Hog filters....
I have used both, one in my stock air lid and one in my vararam. I wanted better filter and to be able to clean it, and keep it clean. As far as performance or sound???? Not by my SOTP but then again it is not calibrated IMO it is more for piece of mind.
Dave
In my expirience with K&N i have not only seen improved performance but my exhaust has more rumble. This is just my expirience though. I have heard others with different outcomes. I dont know how it would make things worse but I guess anything is possible. I would check with your local performance shop for more info.
More air through = more dirt through....
But does K&N let more air through???
If I remember the data correctly,there was a post about a year ago with independent engineering data that showed when new paper outflowed K&N, but when dirty, K&N outflowed paper....
The jury is out, but in the interim, I used Both K&N and Fram Air Hog filters....
Thats is pure crap. K&N flows 4 times more air than a Delco paper.
Why are they on every Indy car and the K&N design (screen oil cloth)
Now made by several companies.Is part of every aftermarket intake
pure bs.
Last edited by 3 Z06ZR1; Oct 11, 2005 at 01:51 PM.
It can't be the only change if you want hp. I LOST 3hp adding the K&N to a modded air box with only a cat-back change. Other changes and/or tuning are needed. It is not a hp gainer by itself.
You had another varible screwing with you.
Like the catback change the K&N caused nothing as far as hp.loss.
Try a dyno tune to get your hp. K&N with the catback =too lean =power loss. some cars don't adjust as well.
I will look to see if I can find a copy of the report. I tried the Forum search engine... It did not find it.
I also have a colleague who used to manage a plant that made paper air filters. He has always said that K&N air flow is no better than paper...
Who and what is one to believe?
I have put a K&N in three cars, 87 Buick Grand National, 97 Z-28 Camaro, and my 03 MN6 Vette. I did nothing to the air boxes on the 3 cars. I put in a K&N filter that replaced the orginal paper filter. On all 3 cars, my mpg increased usually 1.5 to almost 3, the time/speed was better on the strip for the Buick and the Camaro, I have not taken the vette to the strip, and yes there is a little more sound at WOT, but I like that. Go to the K&N web site and you can read the write ups.