When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I posted this in C6 Gen too, but I figure runflats have a lot more exposure in the C5 world.
I'm curious to see what sorts of experiences people have had with runflats and actual real-life flat tires.
What happened and what did you do? Was it just a nail & a slow leak, or was it a sidewall slice/total deflation where the tire would hold NO air? Did you drive on the flat or air it up enough to make it to a repair facility?
Did you, or will you replace the runflats with another set of runflats? Would you be happy with non-runflats, an inflator kit, and a can or tire sealant?
From: Lost in the Pine Barrens with only ketchup and relish packs, New Jersey
I picked up a screw and I could actually hear the air coming out of the tire as I drove. It was a rear tire and it really didn't drive all that bad, but it was noticable. I drove about 25 miles to a trusted tire shop and had it patched from the inside and ended up putting another 20k miles on the tire. I use the car as a daily driver and it was truly convenient not to have to stop and change the tire. I know there is a performance trade-off, but for SAFE street driving, I would argue that the difference is minimal.
I found a nail it a tire. I pulled it out to see what would happen.
Car rode fine as I drove it to the Goodyear dealer for a patch from the inside of course.
Dave
I found a nail it a tire. I pulled it out to see what would happen.
Car rode fine as I drove it to the Goodyear dealer for a patch from the inside of course.
Dave
Similar, I had a nail in a rear runflat.
I had a goodyear store patch it and drove on it for probably 10k more.
Now I don't have runflats, I have a plug kit & AAA if I need to wait for a day and a half for them to come tow it.
... it was truly convenient not to have to stop and change the tire. I know there is a performance trade-off, but for SAFE street driving, I would argue that the difference is minimal.
What if you had a choice between runflats or non-runflats + an inflator kit/sealant in the car? Would you have paid extra for the runflats from the get-go, or is it just in hindsight that you see the value of them?
I can't decide what I would do. I've been driving my car for 9 years without a spare and without runflats. Never had a tire problem to speak of. I figure I have a cell phone & roadside assistance to handle it.
I ran runflats for a few years. Had two flats, both were nails. They did loose the air. It was noticeable when driving but they got me to the dealer to be repaired.
I have since ditched the runflats as with the mods on the car they just would not hold the HP and were noisy to boot. I went with Michelin PS2s and love them. Great ride, better handling and quite a bit quieter. I carry a patch kit and a little compressor.
I went with a larger tire and wider rim with the PS2s I now have 295s on the rear and 275s on the front.
You will get a different answer from the performance crowd.
My experience with a Nissan 300ZX (collapsible spare): Had flat doing 80 at midnight on a remote section of I95 North of Jacksonville. By the time I stopped, the tire was shredded and I was just over the crest of an overpass (businesses closed). I was worried about 1) 18 wheeler drifting a foot or two over and 2) some not so "good samaritin" stopping by to help. I got it done but during the change a large group of fire ants decided to check my legs out - I kept going and worried about the ant bites later.
My wife has 15K mi on Dunlop runflats SC430. I was initially skeptical, but I like the idea of her being able to drive home. The narrow sidewall results in a rough un-Lexus like ride at times though. I'm now in my 7th decade with matching knee replacements so I'll stick with the RFs on the vette too.
What if you had a choice between runflats or non-runflats + an inflator kit/sealant in the car? Would you have paid extra for the runflats from the get-go, or is it just in hindsight that you see the value of them?
most people would probably not choose them if they didnt come on the car.....but once you've had a flat and experienced the convenience of not even stopping the car......to me it makes them worth the money.....so i plan to keep them....
I hit something on the highway (Rt.287, NJ) that punched a hole in the tyre big enough to put four fingers through, I was doing about 70mph when it happened. The console went 31 psi .. 16 psi .. you have a flat ... max speed 55mph.
The console's changes were tick tick tick. That quick.
I slowed down and took it into the nearest town where they replaced the tyre. Probably travelled about 12 miles on the runflat while it carried no air.
It worked in my situation, saved me from a catastrophic blow-out and enabled me to limp to the nearest dealership that could fix the tyre.
most people would probably not choose them if they didnt come on the car.....but once you've had a flat and experienced the convenience of not even stopping the car......to me it makes them worth the money.....so i plan to keep them....
atilla...
That seems to be the impression I've gotten thus far. "I wouldn't have chosen them, but I became thankful that I had them"
Had a leak(big nail) in rear. Had it patched from inside. When I put the new rims and tires on I switched to non runflats and gave the originals to a buddy with a vette. They had 14,000 on them then and have gone many miles since the trade. I have the sensors in and a pump-sealant kit now.
I had 3 incidents in the 2 years I owned the 97...all were immediate air out of tire on the highway doing 80...DIC said Low air, tire flat almost at the same time (rear passenger side both times) and drivers side front the next time. Run flats saved me all three times...
Recently with my 7800 mile 2000 coupe- I picked up a roofing nail and it also went from full to flat in a matter of minutes...this time I was about 5 minutes from home...patched it real quick then took it in for a proper repair.
I agree- run flats are loud and do not get the best traction...but I am a believer...even if its going to cost me $$ next tire change...I will go run flats again, Florida roads are littered with crap and its a matter of when, not if it will happen!
What if you had a choice between runflats or non-runflats + an inflator kit/sealant in the car?
Remember that alot of "blowouts" and punctures other than small nails and things cannot always be repaired with a can of "fix a flat" or an inflator and plugs....it basically comes down to what keeps you from worrying about it when driving the vette.....if you can drive down a bad part of town or a dark country road and not worry about the car having no spare tire, then you can get by without them......if your like me and carried 2 spares in the truck "just in case".....then they are worth the few bucks more.....as for the extra road noise and possible lost handling.....i dont drive on a road course circuit and my car has a volume **** on the radio......
Shortly after I purchased the car I took an extended cross country road trip. Interstate all the way. When I got to my destination, I was cleaning the car and noticed a good size nail through the tread about 1/2" to 3/4" in from the edge of the side wall. If this was regular tire it would have been a flat for sure but because the side walls are so thick on the RFs it never went all the way through. No pressure loss at all.
That said, I have decided to dump the run flats and just pruchased a set of GS D3s.
The RFs are getting louder by the day and recenty, the rears don't hook up at all. I guess the compound is just getting hard, dry and tired. They were the stock tires and tread wear was great - been on the car for 30K and could still go for a while.
Maybe I will be sorry later but its worth a try to see the difference between the RFs and regular tires. I don't hear of too many Z owners switching to RFs but the coupes and verts seem to go the other way pretty frequently.
P.S. I can't remember the last time I got a flat on the road with any vehicle - so what that they had a spare, it just doesn't happen that much! OK no one needs to say it - I know "Famous Last Words."
Last edited by EStreeter; Aug 17, 2006 at 04:18 PM.
I had a huge nail in my right rear tire last week...tire wouldn't even hold air. Fortunately, I was on my was on my way to get a new set of Suimitomos installed, so I just ran it empty for 20 miles! The DIC said not to go over 55, I was waiting for the next message to say "good luck"!
I've had three flats in two plus years on runflats. Two in sidewalls and one in the tread area. BTW: All were rear tires. I drive all three to a GY dealer and had the repair done. Heck I even had GY replace two tires under road hazard insurance.
Recently, I've still replaced the RF's with non-Rf tires. I now keep my AAA card in the car yet I've not had a flat since going to nonRF tires. I like the lack of road noise and the softer feel of the new tires better than the OE runflats.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.