~~~Recall issues: Problems in C5's ~~~
For instance -
Rear diff LEAK........... Very common
Seats rocking (especially Driver's seat)
Fuel gauge misreadings (http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show....php?t=1801998)
Steering Column problems (10 second wait)...
These are just a few to start with. My question is, if these problems only happend in a couple of cars, I'd understand. But we see these problems as a COMMON thing in most cars, happening one time or another. Some ppl have replaced the rear diff seal more than 2-3 times, it nevers gets fixed. Same thing with the fuel guage. Always acting up. I mean how much Techron does this thing need to work!
I've tired everything. Sometimes it works, sometime it doesnt. Cars even less than half the price of a Vette have NONE of these problems 
Bottom line - if certain problems seem to occur frequently, and on a LOT of cars, why is GM not doing a recall...? That is the question. (Not to mention, its GM's Flagship car and and American icon of pride)
... Just wondering...
Last edited by Vette_Fan; Sep 2, 2007 at 04:42 AM.


The power of a class action law suit

Thank goodness for the Forum to fix most of the others at a reasonable cost. We can than use decent parts which is probably the real reason for the problem in the first place.

Bottom line - if certain problems seem to occur frequently, and on a LOT of cars, why is GM not doing a recall...? That is the question. (Not to mention, its GM's Flagship car and and American icon of pride)
problems.
Then no recalls to fix the problems..that's so wrong...
This is why GM has been in such trouble for last 30 years..
The last GM car I bought new was the Pontiac Transport in '92. Nice heavy vehicle to haul my kids in, nice engine, 3800 V6, good mileage, 28 Hwy. We wanted FWD for the snow so the Ford was out, and the Chrysler minivans were JUNK. I knew the Trannies in their FWD vehicles of that era were weak, so to reassure me, the salesman took me to the Service manager and he described over 100 improvements to the transmission, and told me I was good to go. I bought the vehicle and lost the tranny 2000 miles out of warranty. I fought with GM, and they paid half the bill, I paid $900. The vehicle literally fell apart while using it as well, door handles, leaking shocks, ashtray broke and snapped out of the dash with a soft drink in the holder, battery died at 3 years old and stranded my wife, Sliding door would come off the track, etc. I traded the car in at 38K miles on a used '90 crown Vic with a 5.0, we literally drove that car into the ground, (204K miles) just replacing fluids tires and brakes, no issues. I haven't gone back to GM till now, and my Corvette got off to a rocky start with many of the above mentioned problems, and some not mentioned. I think GM has some great engineering, but terrible quality parts! BTW, lifetime GM owners, how long did it take the General to make a gas gauge that didn't swing all over the place while driving? My Dad's 79 Cadillac still did it, as well as my '92, yet my '59 T-Bird's gauge was perfect, and every other Ford I've owned. How many years did Chevy have bad case hardening on their cams? I can't even count how many I replaced at the Buick dealer I worked for on used cars. My estimation is the cam problem existed at least 10 -15 years!!!
The fact that my '04 Corvette has the the same column lock problem as an 97, is criminal. In the case of Corvette, you have no alternate choice to buy in the same price range, that is the root of our problem!
John
The truth of the matter is they are making great strides with Buick for example scoring as high or higher than Toyota in customer satisfaction and initial quality...BUT..they dont realize the ill will caused by such issues on a "halo" car affect the Chevy brand and GM as a whole negatively...some companies never learn or they learn too late...I like GM..hope its not too late...
Recalls happen after complaints or investigation by the NTSB (National Transportation Safety board).
Technical Service Bulletins and hidden warranties might occur for those problems that plague the vehicle but are not related to safety.
. NOW, this COULD be a safety issue, don't you think... I mean, even an Airbag issue. I'm not sure if its in correct working order or not.
... So, will GM take a look at it and fix it???? I'm not sure, but I doubt it..
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
That's why, other than mileage, it really doesn't seem to matter WHAT year of C5 you get. Unless you've just got to have certain options that the earlier years didn't have.
Whatta improvement... I think I read in a lot of places that C5 was built NEW from the ground up, taking nothing from the C4. So, I guess, GM engineers didn't have enough Coffee when the designed C5..
As for the other issues it's a shame.
Dave





The last GM car I bought new was the Pontiac Transport in '92. Nice heavy vehicle to haul my kids in, nice engine, 3800 V6, good mileage, 28 Hwy. We wanted FWD for the snow so the Ford was out, and the Chrysler minivans were JUNK. I knew the Trannies in their FWD vehicles of that era were weak, so to reassure me, the salesman took me to the Service manager and he described over 100 improvements to the transmission, and told me I was good to go. I bought the vehicle and lost the tranny 2000 miles out of warranty. I fought with GM, and they paid half the bill, I paid $900. The vehicle literally fell apart while using it as well, door handles, leaking shocks, ashtray broke and snapped out of the dash with a soft drink in the holder, battery died at 3 years old and stranded my wife, Sliding door would come off the track, etc. I traded the car in at 38K miles on a used '90 crown Vic with a 5.0, we literally drove that car into the ground, (204K miles) just replacing fluids tires and brakes, no issues. I haven't gone back to GM till now, and my Corvette got off to a rocky start with many of the above mentioned problems, and some not mentioned. I think GM has some great engineering, but terrible quality parts! BTW, lifetime GM owners, how long did it take the General to make a gas gauge that didn't swing all over the place while driving? My Dad's 79 Cadillac still did it, as well as my '92, yet my '59 T-Bird's gauge was perfect, and every other Ford I've owned. How many years did Chevy have bad case hardening on their cams? I can't even count how many I replaced at the Buick dealer I worked for on used cars. My estimation is the cam problem existed at least 10 -15 years!!!
The fact that my '04 Corvette has the the same column lock problem as an 97, is criminal. In the case of Corvette, you have no alternate choice to buy in the same price range, that is the root of our problem!
John
Claiming you know a brands repair record by your own personal experience is ridiculous. My father owned a Mustang where the engine fell out, so all fords must suck, right? (and yes that really happened).
Look at the facts. GM scores at the very top for inital quality, behind toyota and ahead of brands like honda, etc. I agree that early 80's and even early 90's cars plain stunk, but new models are relatively trouble free. Guess which brand scored the absolute worst...........Mercedes. Should be say they suck??? Long term reliability has the C/K1500 series way ahead of the F-150 series. I'm not trying to sway anyone to the GM brand, buy what you like that fits in your budget/lifestyle. However, the GM bashing, that was warranted in the 80's, doesn't apply anymore.
GM's biggest problem (and Ford/Chrysler as well, because in case anyone didn't notice it.........GM is the only one doing OK right now), is it HUGE labor/pension overhead. This cuts into bottom line, so they have to cheap out on parts/fixes. I do have an issue with that, but every other manufacturer is in the same boat.
How many transmissions does chrysler go through? Or, the explorer is too likely to roll over, so lets reduce pressure in the tires to lower Cg. Low tire pressure, more tire flex, tires loose tread, crash. Oops, should have figured that one out before selling millions of those things. 90's Civics rust strait through. I could go on, but it's late.
Without question, there is a pattern of common problems on the C5 and we're all not hitting them by accident. Some of these have been mentioned such as the fuel tank sending units. I'd also like to add the defective door control modules with the door lock relays that go out.
I think there is more than enough "evidence" to support a Class action Lawsuit. While I am not an attorney, from the little I know about about class action suits, assuming there is a judgement for plantiffs (that would be us), the lawyers would end up getting a large percentage of the settlement to cover their time and costs and the members of the class would not typically recover their actual losses and only get a small fraction of what they are out. Its sad, but that's what I have seen with every single stock of mine that tanked and class actions were brought against the offending company. If anyone on this board who reads this feels I am in error, feel free to chime in and correct me... like I said I am not an an attorney.
1. Headlight gears wear out
2. Seats rock (not in a good way)
3. Auto Air display dims and goes blank
4. Fuel gauge issues
5. Rear dif leaks
6. Column lock
7. Battery leaks
8. ECB failures... traction control failures
I think these are the most common.... I have had most of them!
Can someone post a poll to see how many of us have had these isuues.... I suspect that they are VERY common, GM has know for years and still did nothing like take the suppliers to task for sub par parts.... it's a cost issue but how can it go on for YEARS....RANT!!!!!
Claiming you know a brands repair record by your own personal experience is ridiculous. My father owned a Mustang where the engine fell out, so all fords must suck, right? (and yes that really happened).
Look at the facts. GM scores at the very top for inital quality, behind toyota and ahead of brands like honda, etc. I agree that early 80's and even early 90's cars plain stunk, but new models are relatively trouble free. Guess which brand scored the absolute worst...........Mercedes. Should be say they suck??? Long term reliability has the C/K1500 series way ahead of the F-150 series. I'm not trying to sway anyone to the GM brand, buy what you like that fits in your budget/lifestyle. However, the GM bashing, that was warranted in the 80's, doesn't apply anymore.
GM's biggest problem (and Ford/Chrysler as well, because in case anyone didn't notice it.........GM is the only one doing OK right now), is it HUGE labor/pension overhead. This cuts into bottom line, so they have to cheap out on parts/fixes. I do have an issue with that, but every other manufacturer is in the same boat.
How many transmissions does chrysler go through? Or, the explorer is too likely to roll over, so lets reduce pressure in the tires to lower Cg. Low tire pressure, more tire flex, tires loose tread, crash. Oops, should have figured that one out before selling millions of those things. 90's Civics rust strait through. I could go on, but it's late.
Cheers
Last edited by PierEagle; Sep 3, 2007 at 01:30 AM.




Bill
Bill













