When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
is there a big difference between the 3.42 and the 3.73. im going from the sluggish 2.73. i mean you can buy a brand new 3.42 for like 1200 with no core, or add like 700 bucks for core and get lower topend and mpg, on a daily driver.
From: "It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark, and
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19
NCM Sinkhole Donor
Originally Posted by Bad97ta
is there a big difference between the 3.42 and the 3.73. im going from the sluggish 2.73. i mean you can buy a brand new 3.42 for like 1200 with no core, or add like 700 bucks for core and get lower topend and mpg, on a daily driver.
Hmm, I went from a 2.73 to a 3.42 and love it, I did consider a 3.73 but money was an issue for me as a 3.73 would have been another 700 to 1000 extra, at least the ones I looked at.
Different opinions on the 3.73 for an auto, some people love them and some people say you will never get traction and to stay away.
Honestly, I would have opted for a 3.73 if I had the cash, I mean it does give an advantage over a 3.42 right, and when modding, every advantage counts.
I've had 3.15 stock then 3.42 for two years. Now have 3.73 and love it. IMO, for a daily driver, stick with 3.42. If you want to be quicker, then 3.73.
I've had 3.15 stock then 3.42 for two years. Now have 3.73 and love it. IMO, for a daily driver, stick with 3.42. If you want to be quicker, then 3.73.
well that extra 700 bucks can go towards a converter
I also think you can find a good low mileage 342 for a lot less than 1200. Check Fleabay and some of our forum vendors.
Also give a lot of thought to the converter when you buy it - that will be as important as the gears.
From: "It's 106 miles to Chicago, we've got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark, and
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-‘18-'19
NCM Sinkhole Donor
I've driven cars with 2.73 ( ), 3.15's, 3.42's and one with a 3.73. Frankly I wasn't that impressed by the difference between the 3.73 and the 3.42. The upgrade from a 2.73 to a 3.42 is impressive - so much so that it feels like a totally different car, as the others have said. If you really want to see a noticeable difference, maybe you should consider a 4.10 or a 3.90.
I think the 3.42 is the best compromise of off the line acceleration, top end (who really drives in that range anyway) and freeway cruising. And also as mentioned - if your plans include any HP adders (H/C, forced induction, etc.) you will be glad you went with the 3.42.
Are you planning to drag race the car? If so, you'll want a torque converter (look into the S10 torque converter that Mike Mercury installed in his car), and anyway that you go - you will want someone who knows what they are doing to do a good sharp tune.
Went from 3.15 to 3.42 and noticed a BIG difference. Traction is an issue. For me, I can't imagine 3.73's.
I'm struggling with going to 3.42s from the 3.15. How much reduction in your ET? That's all I'm concerned with. My car is as much a driver as a Friday night summer drag car. I thought 373 would be very agressive with an A4, given the low 4L60E gear ratios. OK at hiway speed with the overdrive, I would think. 3.42s seem like a good compromise. Would I experience signifigant traction issues using 3.42s with 404 RWHP on drag radials?
Went from 3.15 to 3.42 and noticed a BIG difference. Traction is an issue. For me, I can't imagine 3.73's.
but traction can be regained. Go with wider non-runflat tires & rims that will take the extra tire widths; and/or think first before mashing the pedal down.
Personally; I didn't want to take these extra steps; that's why I too went no further than the 3.42 in my A4. Plus, my C5 sees the track about 2 times per year... sometimes only once.
If I was a weekend dragstrip warrior; then I would of made different choices
I thought 373 would be very agressive with an A4, given the low 4L60E gear ratios.
in first gear, the overall ratio with the 3.42's (in the A4) is slightly more that the C5 Z06 MN12 in first gear. But if you add the converters stalled torque ratio... it greatly exceeds the Z06 first gear overall ratio.