Contest Your Traffic Citations

Back in late September 2008, I received a traffic ticket by a California Highway Patrolman for speeding, VC22349a, 75+ in a 65 zone on N/B US101 north of Santa Barbara, CA. I requested a Trial by Written Declaration and posted bail = to the $137.50 fine. Nothing to lose. Found guilty. Dang it!
My driving record has 0 points, and I wanted to keep it that way. So, what the heck, filed for a Trial De Novo. I planned on meeting with the DA to see if we could work something out. Well, I learned that on traffic infractions, it is only you and the officer before the judge. Dang it, again. Oh well, maybe the CHP will have more important business and not show up. Nothing to lose.
Show up for my trial last Wednesday, and guess who shows up. Yep, it’s him. Dang it, again III. Well. I go over to him, extend my hand, and introduce myself. We start an amicable conversion and I explain what my original plan of attack was with the DA, which was to seek a reduced charge of Coasting in Neutral, VC21710, which is a 0 point violation, and forfeit bail. He said that he wouldn’t have any objections to it. We talked shop for about 15-20 minutes.
Time to start the trial. The CHP officer addressed the Judge first, and asked him that, if it was alright with the Court, that he and I had talked earlier, and he would liked to amend the ticket to violation of VC21710. The Judge then asked me if I agreed to plead guilty to the reduced charge. Me: Yes sir, Your Honor. The Judge started writing something, then looked up at me and said; “I’m reducing the fine to $87.00, and the difference in your bail will be refunded in a couple of days” Thank you, Your Honor. End of trial.
Contest your ticket. Nothing to lose. 0 points, + $50.50 refund.
CHP officer, and a
Judge.
Last edited by El Zappo; Jan 23, 2009 at 06:05 PM. Reason: OOPS! Meant to post in OT


The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
-




Bill


California courts follow the Uniform Bail and Penalty Schedules. This insures fairness, statewide. Any court costs are part of the original fine, if I read it correctly. http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/referenc...s/2003bail.pdf
Added Court costs, because you decide to go to trial, sounds very unfair to me. I thought it is your right to a trial. Are people who are convicted of crimes required to pay Court costs? How about the ones found innocent?




This was in Hardeevile, SC which is a major speed trap along about 20 miles of I-95.
I wrote a nice letter to the judge and explained the situation and made my two points:
- My Vette was singled out
- I was not the fastest car on the road at the time
- Yes, I had my speed control set at 80 and was not going to quibble about the 2 mph difference on the COP's radar.
I got a note back from the Clerk of the Court that the charge has been reduced to a no points violation but they were going to keep my fine money.
Lesson Learned - It is always wort a try!



Everyone makes the mistake of not fighting the first ticket you get. Once your driving record has points on it it is much more difficult to get a reduction on a ticket.
My point is that one can consider points and court fines/costs ad nauseam.
Also consider the ongoing damage to your wallet, after the auto insurance companies discover even the slightest reason to make you their "bitch," with outlandish premium hikes. GRT
Last edited by c5-pewter; Jan 24, 2009 at 10:38 AM. Reason: format












Well done. 

