When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm debating K&N cold air induction - is there a reason to have dual cones over just a single or is it whichever look you like (assuming the volume of air handled would be the same)
I'm debating K&N cold air induction - is there a reason to have dual cones over just a single or is it whichever look you like (assuming the volume of air handled would be the same)
Some people will argue that the dual cone is better, but my stance is its setup isn't usually setup right. The ones that use a "T" type dual cone are likely the worst because the air doesn't come in straight and a lot of turbulence is created at the junction of the two cones. Yes, your engine could (in theory) breath easier, but at a cost of turbulence. If you have a screened MAF, that would cut down the turbulence, but the goal would be to not have any turbulence at all.
A single large cone (like what the Breathless Performance Vortex Rammer has) is more preferable because the air comes in straight with little to no turbulence. Believe me, it'll breath fine. I had a Vortex Rammer on my Z06 and it was great.
Some people will argue that the dual cone is better, but my stance is its setup isn't usually setup right. The ones that use a "T" type dual cone are likely the worst because the air doesn't come in straight and a lot of turbulence is created at the junction of the two cones. Yes, your engine could (in theory) breath easier, but at a cost of turbulence. If you have a screened MAF, that would cut down the turbulence, but the goal would be to not have any turbulence at all.
A single large cone (like what the Breathless Performance Vortex Rammer has) is more preferable because the air comes in straight with little to no turbulence. Believe me, it'll breath fine. I had a Vortex Rammer on my Z06 and it was great.
I'm leaning toward a single - just trying to ensure that I'm not losing anything going that way.
Vararam seems to be a bit more popular than others - your thoughts...I'm had great luck with K&N equipment as well....
Well my dyno sheet under my profile will show you what my "low dyno numbers" Vararam put down with just bolt ons. The Car will run 11.7 with crappy air on drag radials, so again I can't complain.
I noticed a nice gain with the Vararam when it was fairly stock and their support is unreal.
I'm leaning toward a single - just trying to ensure that I'm not losing anything going that way.
On a mostly stock car, the vararam is pretty good. What makes it a good choice is that even though it gets its air from the two ports on the front, they come together at the filter which helps straighten out the air before going through the bridge. That's a huge benefit. Far less turbulence than a dual cone setup. The Calloway Honker, Blackwing and Vortex Rammer are all good choices.
As already stated anything is better than stock. Its hard to believe this thing got any air stock. I like my Vortex Rammer, but would hesitate to go with a Honker, Vararam, or anything that gets air from under the radiator shroud.
As already stated anything is better than stock. Its hard to believe this thing got any air stock. I like my Vortex Rammer, but would hesitate to go with a Honker, Vararam, or anything that gets air from under the radiator shroud.
Vararam does not get anything from under the radiator shroud. It pulls air from the front two vents where the fog lights are located. The C5 is a bottom breather for the Radiator and the Vararam does not alter that airflow in the least.
Vararam does not get anything from under the radiator shroud. It pulls air from the front two vents where the fog lights are located. The C5 is a bottom breather for the Radiator and the Vararam does not alter that airflow in the least.
I hope you know what I meant. It gets air from some where other than a plastic box in the engine bay.