When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm no fan of 3m having used it twice. Both on black cars. I live in FL, and it is a harsh environment w/ the sun and getting sandblasted. There are 2 grades of 3m and I went w/ the better one the second time which had a shiny clear finish. It scratched and got marred up easily. having black I'm sure it showed worse. I removed it to look better for my trade value, and if I had to respray that would have been an expense on a car I was trading. My tint installer recommended Cleartastic and I have found it to be much better, doesn't scratch easily and had a nice shine. I did my whole hood and no one catches it unless I point it out.
Gotcha. A co-worker has 3m film and has a scratch on his. So far, I have no scratches on my bumper, even after a fender bender with an Equinox.
Being that automotive clearcoat is some of the toughest, most durable, weather resistant stuff out there, I guess I have difficulty understanding why a softer, thicker material would be permanently put over the top of it. I would think that the armorcoat would be more susceptible to environmental aging and as or more difficult to repair than a good clear coat? If it were reversible and designed to cover and protect the clearcoat from damage, then I could see the utility much like for the 3m film. but is you have to scratch / scuff the clear, you lose the benefits of having a well done clearcoat, no?
btw. I have a phd in polymer chemistry and do isocyanate / polyurethane chemistry for a living... ;-) I also do my own paint work on many of my toys, but am more of a backyard hack - definately not a pro...
Originally Posted by Tech
Correct. ArmorCoat is permanent. However, I don't think it's fair to say "when" it gets cruddy. The product is designed to last as long, or longer than the factory clear coat. Why did you remove the 3m film before trading the car in?
Being that automotive clearcoat is some of the toughest, most durable, weather resistant stuff out there, I guess I have difficulty understanding why a softer, thicker material would be permanently put over the top of it. I would think that the armorcoat would be more susceptible to environmental aging and as or more difficult to repair than a good clear coat? If it were reversible and designed to cover and protect the clearcoat from damage, then I could see the utility much like for the 3m film. but is you have to scratch / scuff the clear, you lose the benefits of having a well done clearcoat, no?
btw. I have a phd in polymer chemistry and do isocyanate / polyurethane chemistry for a living... ;-) I also do my own paint work on many of my toys, but am more of a backyard hack - definately not a pro...
Who said it was softer? I said thicker and more durable.
I can't tell you how/why it works. I can only tell you that it has worked well for me thus far.