When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I just bought a 2001 C5 coupe, manual 6-speed, 5.7 V8 with 62,560 miles. The dealer filled it up for me and when I found the fuel range button, it said 164 miles. I saw somewhere that it has an 18 gallon tank. The original window sticker says it gets 19 mpg city and 28 highway. How is it possible that I can only go 164 miles on a full tank? I have put about 40 miles on it and it's down a 1/4 tank. Is there something wrong here and if so, what can I do to fix it?
It calculates the mileage based on the amount of fuel used and the distance driven recently. If it thinks you're only getting 164 miles on a full tank, then that means somebody was doing burnouts in the parking lot with it just before they filled it up.
The fuel gauge is notoriously unreliable. Did the gauge drop quickly to 1/4 contents or travel down smoothly? It could be a gauge error.
The DIC/gauge take contents from the senders in the fuel tank so if its getting a bad reading of contents, all the DIC calculations will be wrong.
Fill the car to full again and do a manual check of the gas mileage. You should get about 18-20 around town (about 300 miles range). You're correct that the two tanks combined take 18 gallons although putting in about 15 is normal. A quick manual check should show if its a gauge problem. If so, buy some Techron fuel system cleaner and run it through the tank.
If you really are getting less than 10 mpg, either you're having a great time or there's a problem.
Whenever you fill up it's recommended to reset your average MPG on the display. If the car was driven on very short trips or driven hard each time it was started your average MPG may be very low and thus effecting your range. With some spirited driving, cruising on the weekends and driving to work in traffic during the week I manually calculated almost 18mpg when I filled up.
Last edited by Deviant LS6; Nov 17, 2011 at 03:26 AM.
i have a 6 sp 2001 conv. most of my driving is 20 miles each way to and from work. my average MPG since May is 29.8. i rarely get less the 500 miles per tank.
Vettes commonly have fuel gauge issues. Techron really does work.
From: In a parallel universe. Currently own 2014 Stingray Coupe.
C7 of the Year - Modified Finalist 2021
MO Events Coordinator
St. Jude Co-Organizer
St. Jude Donor '03 thru '26
NCM Sinkhole Donor
CI 5, 8 & 11 Veteran
Even though the dealer supposedly filled the car up, did the gas gauge actually show that it was full? If not, that could be your problem. The C5 has some issues with sulfur building up on the fuel sending unit and causing erroneous readings. If it did not read full, try putting some Techron in the gas and see if that clears the sending unit. If it did read full, then try clearing out the info on the DIC and see what it reads then.
Whenever you fill up it's recommended to reset your average MPG on the display. If the car was driven on very short trips or driven hard each time it was started your average MPG may be very low and thus effecting your range. With some spirited driving, cruising on the weekends and driving to work in traffic during the week I manually calculated almost 18mpg when I filled up.
I've been going crazy trying to up my gas mileage - dealership BG44K treatment, maintenance on Vararam filter, cleaned MAF & TB, new plugs & wires and finally a dyno tune. DIC still reading 12.3 MPG
Did the reset this morning a couple of times in to work and it jumped up to 18.1 Stress immediately went away.
I've been going crazy trying to up my gas mileage - dealership BG44K treatment, maintenance on Vararam filter, cleaned MAF & TB, new plugs & wires and finally a dyno tune. DIC still reading 12.3 MPG
Did the reset this morning a couple of times in to work and it jumped up to 18.1 Stress immediately went away.
Thanks for tip!!!
I found on my 03 that It said I was getting about 18mpg. I did the old fashioned test on my last trip and got 25.7. Try it you might be amazed
easy fix...
it says 164 cause it is calculating by ur current "avg mpg"
scroll through untill you find the avg mpg. it will prob be a low number. in the teens if its full at saying 164 range.
once u found the average mpg. hit the reset button. drive down the road/hwy for a 20 seconds. when you see the avg # go up on the dash that what it was before, you will see the range shoot up as well..
I've been going crazy trying to up my gas mileage - dealership BG44K treatment, maintenance on Vararam filter, cleaned MAF & TB, new plugs & wires and finally a dyno tune. DIC still reading 12.3 MPG
Did the reset this morning a couple of times in to work and it jumped up to 18.1 Stress immediately went away.
Thanks for tip!!!
sarge, the DIC is notoriously inaccurate. full the car up. note the odometer reading, drive for a bit (a few days if it is your dd or the weekend if it isn't, then go back to the same station you filled up at, at approximately the same time and fill up again. do the simple math and you'll have a much more accurate idea bout your fuel mileage. BTW, we are neighbors. i'm in hollywood. nice to meet you.
sarge, the DIC is notoriously inaccurate. full the car up. note the odometer reading, drive for a bit (a few days if it is your dd or the weekend if it isn't, then go back to the same station you filled up at, at approximately the same time and fill up again. do the simple math and you'll have a much more accurate idea bout your fuel mileage. BTW, we are neighbors. i'm in hollywood. nice to meet you.
You are in a panic way to early! Take a few deep breaths and manually check the mileage as suggested above. I have an 02 which gets 29.8 mpg with me taking no special care to get better mileage. Anything under 20 to me means you are running the hell out of it, or the car has a low geared rear in it, or major engine work for added hp.
i have a 6 sp 2001 conv. most of my driving is 20 miles each way to and from work. my average MPG since May is 29.8. i rarely get less the 500 miles per tank.
Vettes commonly have fuel gauge issues. Techron really does work.
I have a '02 C5Z with 9k. miles, only premium fuel, always in tip top tune, driven very easily, city/hwy combined do I rarely get more than 18 mpg., 350 miles on a full tank of gas, 29.8 mpg avg., is econo car territory, how is that possible? My son also has an '02 Z and his mileage is almost identical to mine.
Econo car territory on a vett is possible for a combination of reasons but your first tip off comes from looking at the tac at 70 mph. On a standard with a 6 speed you are doing 1400 to 1500 rpm. while the typical 4 cyl rice burner is running upwards of 2000. They need the rpms to have power enough to pull hills and generally operate on the highway. A vett has a powerful engine that will pull the car easily on the highway and allows for use of a fairly high geared rear end while running at slightly over an idle. The vett. idleing with minimal load uses minimal fuel while the rice burner is running a higher rpm and under more load. However, with the minimal weight and lower gearing the econo with a 2.0 or less engine can still pull some good mpg numbers. BUT THEY JUST DON'T LOOK GOOD DOING IT LIKE WE DO!
Econo car territory on a vett is possible for a combination of reasons but your first tip off comes from looking at the tac at 70 mph. On a standard with a 6 speed you are doing 1400 to 1500 rpm. while the typical 4 cyl rice burner is running upwards of 2000. They need the rpms to have power enough to pull hills and generally operate on the highway. A vett has a powerful engine that will pull the car easily on the highway and allows for use of a fairly high geared rear end while running at slightly over an idle. The vett. idleing with minimal load uses minimal fuel while the rice burner is running a higher rpm and under more load. However, with the minimal weight and lower gearing the econo with a 2.0 or less engine can still pull some good mpg numbers. BUT THEY JUST DON'T LOOK GOOD DOING IT LIKE WE DO!
You're assuming that I am driving in the city in 6th gear to get 29 mpg? not realistic. I'm talking avg. city driving of 18 mpg that I'm getting, yes I probably could achieve 30 mpg all hwy in 6th gear, but to avg. 29 city/hwy is a stretch. To say that fuelling a 5700 cc engine at 1400 rpm's vs 2000 cc's at 2000 rpm's would be equal in fuel economy is unbelieveable.
You're assuming that I am driving in the city in 6th gear to get 29 mpg? not realistic. I'm talking avg. city/hwy real world of 18 mpg that I'm getting, yes I probably could achieve 30 mpg all hwy in 6th gear, but to avg. 29 city/hwy is a stretch. To say that fuelling a 5700 cc engine at 1400 rpm's vs 2000 cc's at 2000 rpm's would be equal in fuel economy is unbelieveable.
18 city is not bad, I get ~31 on the highway after a trip and if I do some mixed driving then I get about 25.
You're assuming that I am driving in the city in 6th gear to get 29 mpg? not realistic. I'm talking avg. city driving of 18 mpg that I'm getting, yes I probably could achieve 30 mpg all hwy in 6th gear, but to avg. 29 city/hwy is a stretch. To say that fuelling a 5700 cc engine at 1400 rpm's vs 2000 cc's at 2000 rpm's would be equal in fuel economy is unbelieveable.
I actually did not make any assumptions regarding where or how you drive. You asked a question and I provided an answer based on mileage numbers I get and the reason I believe corvettes get reasonably good gas mileage. I have a base C5 and a kia econo. I drive the same highway to work with both cars, about 90 percent highway. You are correct in that the Vett and Kia do not get the same mileage. The vette gets 29.8 and the kia gets 31. I have not driven the vett on a trip of all highway miles to know what it gets. I was recently at a corvette gathering of over 20 cars where we discussed mileage. In polling the group nearly half of them claim that they get over 30 on a highway trip. One guy I remember saying he got 31.2 which as I recall was the highest claimed.
Last edited by Buggyman; Nov 18, 2011 at 10:18 AM.
Reason: To insure accuracy