When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It has been a few years since I had my last 'Vette which was a '99 that I loved very much. This is why when I saw the one I have now (also a '99) come on the market, I jumped on it!
This one has all of the options I used and enjoyed on the other one and not the ones I either didn't use (F55 susp. kept it in stiffest setting 24/7), or have given others frustrating problems (memory package, I was lucky as mine worked great).
Now though, I am reading many posts about things that are problematic with '99s and are either no longer available or soon will be! This worries me as this is my only car and is my DD.
What happens when the EBCM has problems? Do you just lose anti-lock functionality with the brakes, or does it make the car un-driveable?!?
Even if I can send such a unit out to be repaired or rebuilt, it would be a serious problem for me transportation-wise while I waited for it to come back.
Just how serious a problem is this and what are some other things I might ought to watch for??
From: Should this thoughtful, valuable contribution meet with no acknowledgement or 'thanks' this post----
There is a looooooooooong list of unavailable/unrepairable parts now for the C5. This is what is so sad, and what has caused me to begin thinking about a C6, or C7, if I can make it just a little longer....what a forking shame....thanks GM.
There is a looooooooooong list of unavailable/unrepairable parts now for the C5. This is what is so sad, and what has caused me to begin thinking about a C6, or C7, if I can make it just a little longer....what a forking shame....thanks GM.
and here is the single biggest reason values are dropping and will continue to move down. it's going to get worse in 2014
this just makes me rage about gm. they simply do not support their cars in the long term.
and people wonder why kids are driving hondas and toyotas ....which the dealers actually HAVE parts for
Mine has been out for 6 months. it comes and goes though. Maybe a grounding issue on mine. But to answer your question, it is perfectly fine to drive. I just completed a 3K mile trip on the HRPT. It's great for burnouts if it isn't working
you don't have anti lock brakes or traction control, that's all. Or active handling if you have that option, which I don't. Many things can cause it to mal function. steering position sensor, wheel speed sensors etc. If it goes out it may be another part that's actually causing it. Or it may be the unit itself.
Worry about it if and when you have a problem. Reading these forums can make you paranoid about driving anything.
That's true. But in the case of a vette I have experinced almost every known common issue on my C4 and now my C5. My butt just recently started leaking to add to the list. The cars were designed great, but the build quality of them is just a tad north of a yugo.
That's true. But in the case of a vette I have experinced almost every known common issue on my C4 and now my C5. My butt just recently started leaking to add to the list. The cars were designed great, but the build quality of them is just a tad north of a yugo.
I don't think you can blame the quality of build if you mean assembly. From working on mine I'd say the guys in Bowling Green do a fair job with what they have to work with. The common failures are not because of assembly. It's more to do with inferior components. And the same inferior components are put on every single car down the line. Hence the common failures.
A friend of mine put it best comparing Japanese cars.
Americans (including GM) have brilliant engineers. They design some awesome cars. But the bean counters in management take the design and specify the cheapest sources for the components regaurdless of quality. The Japanese don't do that.
Last edited by fendermender; Jun 12, 2012 at 05:15 PM.
I don't think you can blame the quality of build if you mean assembly. From working on mine I'd say the guys in Bowling Green do a fair job with what they have to work with. The common failures are not because of assembly. It's more to do with inferior components. And the same inferior components are put on every single car down the line. Hence the common failures.
A friend of mine put it best comparing Japanese cars.
Americans (including GM) have brilliant engineers. They design some awesome cars. But the bean counters in management take the design and specify the cheapest sources for the components regaurdless of quality. The Japanese don't do that.
at the same time a 1998 nsx was just under double the price of a c5. that better build quality came with one hell of a sticker shock for a car with similar performance
There is a looooooooooong list of unavailable/unrepairable parts now for the C5. This is what is so sad, and what has caused me to begin thinking about a C6, or C7, if I can make it just a little longer....what a forking shame....thanks GM.
I'm only aware of the EBCM being unavailable/unrepairable. What else?
From: Should this thoughtful, valuable contribution meet with no acknowledgement or 'thanks' this post----
Originally Posted by Front Runner
I'm only aware of the EBCM being unavailable/unrepairable. What else?
There have been several threads...all individually revealed...would be great if they somehow got compiled into one thread. Here are some that come to mind for 97-99 model years. Key fobs, auto trans shifter when the red gear indicator melts/breaks due to heat embrittlement over time, PCM.....this is a nasty issue for the 97...worse than the EBCM issue, but a rebuilt 98 will work if you can find one....get a spare now for around $100-150. The PCM is VIN specific so whatever your vehicle options are must be matched by the PCM flash. If not, you could drive it but you may lose some features such as AC, or whatever. There are many more examples....maybe someone else can remember more of them.
Worry about it if and when you have a problem. Reading these forums can make you paranoid about driving anything.
Theres a lot of truth to that.
And to answer your question, when the EBCM goes you can drive the car exactly like any car before Anti=Lock brakes. You loose Active Handeling and Anti=Lock, and you would have to clear the DIC message every time you started it.
BTW there are many components to the AH/TC system, the EBCM is only one and while they do go (and on a 99 you will have trouble finding one) they dont go that often. The rest of the components (SWPS, WPS) are still available.
Thanks for all of the answers and input guys!! I really appreciate it!
As some have said, these are such awesome cars and are sooo reasonably priced compared to most other cars of equal or even lesser performance. Luckily for people like me, this translates down into the used ranks as well as I could probably never afford a brand new one. So, if I have to put up with a few issues to enjoy owning and driving a world class sports car, bring it on!!!!!
I agree that it would be nice if Chevy would make more of an effort to support their flagship model though. It's not as if they don't know whether these cars are going to have a large and active following throughout their entire lifetime!!!!!!!!!! Cradle to grave, someone is going to love each and every one of them!!!!!
I don't think you can blame the quality of build if you mean assembly. From working on mine I'd say the guys in Bowling Green do a fair job with what they have to work with. The common failures are not because of assembly. It's more to do with inferior components. And the same inferior components are put on every single car down the line. Hence the common failures.
A friend of mine put it best comparing Japanese cars.
Americans (including GM) have brilliant engineers. They design some awesome cars. But the bean counters in management take the design and specify the cheapest sources for the components regaurdless of quality. The Japanese don't do that.
Build quality, not assembly. The quality that goes into production of the designed components, testing, and longevity.
But the assembly is suspect as well. I don't know that I have seen many C5's that the pieces all fit like they should. Mine doesn't.
Last edited by RetiredSFC 97; Jun 13, 2012 at 02:56 PM.
This won't help the guy with a '99, but here is a website of someone that rebuilds the EBCM for '01 - '04's. http://www.absfixer.com/
I'm a new owner of a 2002 coupe. Last Saturday I got the dreaded message telling me that I have a failed EBCM, or open circuit. There's only 28k on the car. Anyway, Sunday morning the message went away and then returned in the afternoon. Well, I pulled the plug from the unit and cleaned it with Deoxit, an electronics parts cleaner. I've had no problems since then. Yes, I know that it's only a couple of days, but it seems to have made a difference. I've put a couple of hundred miles on the car since Sunday afternoon and must have started it at least a dozen times.
If I do need to replace mine, it's an easy job. Only 6 screws hold it in place.
In my internet searches, it does appear that this is a very common failure.
That's true. But in the case of a vette I have experinced almost every known common issue on my C4 and now my C5. My butt just recently started leaking to add to the list. The cars were designed great, but the build quality of them is just a tad north of a yugo.
I Agree i know this comment will hurt some feelings here but i think the corvette is really just a $50,000 junkbox. most of us here bought these cars used for those who were able to get warrenty's our big loss was time and disappointment but for those without them lots of cash as well...i bought mine with just 14000 miles on the clock from carmax they lied to me and gave me a check list saying everything was great! but the car was leaking everything, and pistonslap to boot!! at the time i did not even know what pistonslap was. I won't be buying another vette ever again..i have everything fixed for now so ill keep it as long as it stays problem free but if that leaky butt starts again its gone lickie split!!
This won't help the guy with a '99, but here is a website of someone that rebuilds the EBCM for '01 - '04's. http://www.absfixer.com/
I'm a new owner of a 2002 coupe. Last Saturday I got the dreaded message telling me that I have a failed EBCM, or open circuit. There's only 28k on the car. Anyway, Sunday morning the message went away and then returned in the afternoon. Well, I pulled the plug from the unit and cleaned it with Deoxit, an electronics parts cleaner. I've had no problems since then. Yes, I know that it's only a couple of days, but it seems to have made a difference. I've put a couple of hundred miles on the car since Sunday afternoon and must have started it at least a dozen times.
If I do need to replace mine, it's an easy job. Only 6 screws hold it in place.
In my internet searches, it does appear that this is a very common failure.
Rich
Just a follow up on cleaning the plug on the EBCM. I cleaned it about three weeks ago and have had no problems. I wonder how many of these units have been replaced that may not have needed to be replaced?
Just a follow up on cleaning the plug on the EBCM. I cleaned it about three weeks ago and have had no problems. I wonder how many of these units have been replaced that may not have needed to be replaced?
Rich
The C1242 code (bad ground) can mean that the EBCM connectors contain a ground pin/socket that is not connected to ground. When I saw that code, I cleaned all the chassis grounds to no avail. Then I unplugged and plugged the EBCM connectors 4 times and never had that code again. It is similar to the other EBCM failure that causes the "service ABS, traction control, and active hndling" displays to pop up, but the C1242 code is not the same as the others that point to the EBCM.