New headlight designs
People usually end up painting a portion of the plexi, so why not avoid that by making the shroud in a way so paint isn't necessary.


I still think this set up looks very good, I mean the car is curvy and the headlights should be too. If 65mm pro's are used in a similar setup I think it's very possible and it would also bring the top surface area lower leaving plenty of space for a plexi lens.
Also with this setup you could have the option to have bi-xenon pros with maybe a traditional bulb type next to it fitted with bright white leds. Not sure what the cost would be for this but I don't imagine it being much greater than the initial setup you guys are discussing. Who knows it could be less...lighting expense wise that is.
Anywho, this is not me ******* on the design or anything like that. Only an opinion.
Last edited by nvusgt; Sep 27, 2012 at 11:16 AM.
So I would never drop them, but if I did I can't STAND the fixed lights that "pop up". They look like awkward bug eyes. If someone could find a small enough projector to fit into the small vertical height option of the current C5s, I think that would look great, although thats the real challenge. A design just like yours with a plastic top that doesn't project above the hood like most aftermarkets do would be a huge winner, and looking out at my C5 now its tough but I believe its certainly possible. It would really need a low profile projector lense though, and they do exist.
I also think it would look great to have a pop-up headlight that didn't pop up so far, like they do to the fieros.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
People usually end up painting a portion of the plexi, so why not avoid that by making the shroud in a way so paint isn't necessary.


I still think this set up looks very good, I mean the car is curvy and the headlights should be too. If 65mm pro's are used in a similar setup I think it's very possible and it would also bring the top surface area lower leaving plenty of space for a plexi lens.
Also with this setup you could have the option to have bi-xenon pros with maybe a traditional bulb type next to it fitted with bright white leds. Not sure what the cost would be for this but I don't imagine it being much greater than the initial setup you guys are discussing. Who knows it could be less...lighting expense wise that is.
Anywho, this is not me ******* on the design or anything like that. Only an opinion.

As for the people who are now flooding this thread with radioflyers we know his are out there. This thread is to make a set for a lot less money and have more style in the shroud area.
As for the people who are now flooding this thread with radioflyers we know his are out there. This thread is to make a set for a lot less money and have more style in the shroud area.
Now back on track- I think you goal is a great one and I urge you to keep it up! When I was an engineer I had access to a 3D printer, and I've been in the market to buy one of those myself, so that could offer a great low-cost option for prototype parts.
I also think its really important to not only look at how good the light itself looks, but how does it look when its placed into the car. While symmetric balance looks great on the light itself, it ends up not following the look of the car when you look at something like the radioflyers. I think one other thing you could do that would make it really slick is to offset the sizes of the projectors. For example, in the examples of other cars many people posted, one of the great cosmetic items were the off-balance appearance of having a bigger inner or bigger outter projector lens. If this isn't possible for cost control reasons, you may be able to do what the C6 does and stagger the inner lense further out than the outer lense giving it that extra dimension, as the vette is a very-rounded car and a parallel headlight on a rounded bumper/hood/fender looks misplaced.
You will also need to figure out the depth distance of each projector your using, and once you select a projector you should be able to factor in the size constraints. Pull the outside lense as far back as it can go and still fit and you may not only have a cost-effective option, but you may have one of the best looking options as well.
keep it up!
Last edited by Arachnyd; Sep 28, 2012 at 07:53 AM.
Also a 3d printer....that's perfect for prototyping, I don't know why no one else thought of it. Probably because no one has access to one, but if one did, a printer could (depending on the printers capabilities of course) easily make a mock up shroud with crazy contours and lines. Too bad they're expensive.
Lastly, the projectors themselves. I know I've already said this but there really isn't a need for 2 actual projectors. The money could be put toward a single Bi-Xenon option for the outer light source and what looks like a projector lens for the inner with a super bright white SMT led tower, very similar to our DRL led's. This way you could offset the alignment because the difference in size just like Arachnyd was saying.
Also a 3d printer....that's perfect for prototyping, I don't know why no one else thought of it. Probably because no one has access to one, but if one did, a printer could (depending on the printers capabilities of course) easily make a mock up shroud with crazy contours and lines. Too bad they're expensive.
Lastly, the projectors themselves. I know I've already said this but there really isn't a need for 2 actual projectors. The money could be put toward a single Bi-Xenon option for the outer light source and what looks like a projector lens for the inner with a super bright white SMT led tower, very similar to our DRL led's. This way you could offset the alignment because the difference in size just like Arachnyd was saying.
http://www.theretrofitsource.com/pro...roducts_id=236
http://www.theretrofitsource.com/pro...oducts_id=3181





Me too....












