When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I knew we were getting close to this, but . . . If it came to a court hearing and your asked or the other parties lawyer says his client couldn't see your stop lights and the judge asks you "Were your tail lightworkingig and visible , What are you going to say? "Oh yeah they were working, but I had sprayed them with a darker red paint than they were stock." . . I think the conclusion will be your insurance company will not honor or pay the loss because you changed the tail light from stock configuration or in some way rendered them novisiblele. Thus you are at fault ! With all the distractions we have today driving, and you or anyone changes or damages their lighting system on their car, then the outcome is obvious. It's just common sense.
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09, '14-'15-'16-'17-'18
Originally Posted by FYRARMS
That is the same question I ask when I see Corvettes wearing...
...chrome rear bumper letters.
The answer I get is "Because it is my car and I like it." You should probably go with that answer as well.
Wait, what?
Don't you know that's why they made the rear bumpers with those hollowed out letters! For us to fill them with chrome! To go with our chrome wheels! And chrome exhaust tips!
Don't you know that's why they made the rear bumpers with those hollowed out letters! For us to fill them with chrome! To go with our chrome wheels! And chrome exhaust tips!
I am adding a Specterwerkes rear bumper next spring, and the first thing we are doing is filling in those stupid letters before painting it.
The answer I get is "Because it is my car and I like it." You should probably go with that answer as well.
Some of those are fun to look or laugh at depending on how far the owner goes but tinting rear tail lights which are designed to provide a warning to other drivers is like local municipalities tinting traffic signal lights because they think it looks cool...
Originally Posted by Red Racer
Wait, what?
Don't you know that's why they made the rear bumpers with those hollowed out letters! For us to fill them with chrome! To go with our chrome wheels! And chrome exhaust tips!
Exactly! That's why GM took the lead of the C5 modders and added chrome letters to the back of the C7.
Some of those are fun to look or laugh at depending on how far the owner goes but tinting rear tail lights which are designed to provide a warning to other drivers is like local municipalities tinting traffic signal lights because they think it looks cool
Originally Posted by 3boystoys
All this other JUNK isn't safety related.
Those who have not tinted their taillights (such as yourselves) are just assuming there will be some type of horrific accident because nobody can see the taillights of those of us who have tinted them. I can't speak for anyone other than myself, but I can tell you (again) that I have never had a problem with being seen, and have never been warned by law enforcement. When parked next to other cars, my taillight output is brighter than some cars and dimmer than others. Light output is definitely bright enough to be seen easily at night, and bright enough to see the brake lights light up in daylight. Assume all you like, but that is just the way it is. It is fine.
I'm sure you can get brighter bulbs/LEDs so when your done tinting it will be the same or even better light output as OEM.
Exactly. The LED replacement bulbs offer brighter output. The only issue is that there is not as large of an output difference when the brakes are applied. It is slight, but not as noticeable. The third brake light answers any question, though...
I'll say this much, I had a cop right on my bumper on the drive home last night, had to do an 'oh cr@p' stop because the idiot in front of me decided to come to a complete stop to change lanes. Cop didn't pull me over (or hit me) from 'not seeing my brakes', actually went after the other guy (most likely cause he was cheating the commute lane).
I'm not sure how much of a difference that tint I showed would make on stock lighting, but I know with my LED setup on the halos, you can see them better than the stock bulbs.
Those who have not tinted their taillights (such as yourselves) are just assuming there will be some type of horrific accident because nobody can see the taillights of those of us who have tinted them. I can't speak for anyone other than myself, but I can tell you (again) that I have never had a problem with being seen, and have never been warned by law enforcement. When parked next to other cars, my taillight output is brighter than some cars and dimmer than others. Light output is definitely bright enough to be seen easily at night, and bright enough to see the brake lights light up in daylight. Assume all you like, but that is just the way it is. It is fine.
I've seen a few that you could NOT tell when the brake lights came on. Why give the cops a reason to hassle you for such a lame mod anyway.
Again, if you can't see the lights, then there is a problem. The idea is to TINT them, not HIDE them. I have never been hassled by cops. I also have no front plate, my car sits too low, I have loud exhaust, and too-dark windows. Maybe police in IL just love Corvettes. Most just compliment my car and say they like my "FYRARMS" license plate. Your results may vary regarding your own "lame" mods...
Those who have not tinted their taillights (such as yourselves) are just assuming there will be some type of horrific accident because nobody can see the taillights of those of us who have tinted them. I can't speak for anyone other than myself, but I can tell you (again) that I have never had a problem with being seen, and have never been warned by law enforcement. When parked next to other cars, my taillight output is brighter than some cars and dimmer than others. Light output is definitely bright enough to be seen easily at night, and bright enough to see the brake lights light up in daylight. Assume all you like, but that is just the way it is. It is fine.
It's never been about light output from a law enforcement perspective. The issue with most DOTs and state statutes is that the tinted lens covers do not reflect light if the car is parked on the side of the road at night. The OEM tail lights and the aftermarket LED Halo tail lights have reflectors built into the housings to make them DOT compliant. If they are covered up, no reflection. The C7 and other new car models have stand alone red reflectors on the rear fascia so they can then incorporate new lighting designs that don't have reflectors built into the tail light housings.
Many C5 specific aftermarket lighting mods, like the Halo LEDs, actually improve on the original halogen design and I'm sure even with blackout covers produce better light. I think the mod looks good, however I know my local municipalities are hurting for money, so I don't want to give them any ticky-tack reason to pull my butt over. Apparently, they're not interested in beat up Cavaliers (see post #18).
There is a huge difference between blacking out your taillights and lightly tinting them. ESPECIALLY if you have L.E.D taillights. A tinted l.e.d taillight shines much brighter than a stock factory tail light. I drove around a mustang with blacked out taillights for 2 years without having a single issue. I've been stopped for my tint, front license plate and they didnt even mention the taillights and I'm in California, One of the most broke states in the country.
Wow! Glad to see LEOs have their own forum to blow off steam.
Some interesting (and disturbing) comments. I guess cops are like all of us and entitled to bad days. Apparently automotive mods and crabby cops don't mix!