With the current amount of ethanol set at 10% here in PA, and I know there's efforts by the EPA to boost it to 15% soon, I was wondering what has been you personal experiences with ethanol loaded gasoline in your Corvette ? Any changes good or bad ?

 

We have 10% ethanol added here in MO and I've not had any problems with it in my cars, including the Vettes.

 

I guess nobody knows what it will do in the long run but it is known to eat into the softer parts of your fuel systems. My brother flies and will not use it in an airplane because it actually was eating the fuel filters. They now sell ethonol free gasoline in one of our local stations . It is only 89 octane but ethonol free.

 

I have been using 91 Octane E-10 (that's premium here in Idaho) for several years/many miles with no problems in the Vette. However, I filled my truck up after a late spring snow storm a couple of years ago (gas station ramp had lots of slush/water/melt and got a tankful of water (which mixes nicely with ethanol)). Truck would barely start cold, took two tanks of pure gas and two jugs of fuel dryer to clear up. FWIW ethanol fuel is PROHIBITED in piston engine aircraft due to the water bonding properties of the fuel--ice crystals will form at altitude, block the fuel line/injectors and then you are a glider pilot)

 

they run 10% in Kansas and i've never had any issues in the car, truck, or Motorcycle

 

If E15 is approved to be sold in gas stations, it will be sold along side E10, not to replace it.

Any car made after about 1990 is designed to run off E10. Pre-1990 cars, or carbureted cars in general I probably wouldn't put E10 in.

Ethanol acts as an octane booster, and is generally beneficial to high performance engines. I wouldn't worry at all about using it. You pay a hefty premium for ethanol free gasoline.

 

Been running it here for years and no issues at all.

 

More concerned about the eventuality of E85.

 

I will be long gone when and if that happens.

 

 

I suppose it is better than some other chemicals that could be used, but I know that most of the motor heads around here put in a bottle of Stab-ill Ethanol cleaner/dryer to help get the old water in the bottom of your tanks. The commercials are always on the Velocity channel. The Mecum Auction has been on most of today. You can tell the economy is in much better shape by the auction prices are coming out for all cars. A quarter of a million for a 69 Mustang 428 ??????

I just wonder how we're going to do in the mileage when the increase of 15% ethanol is made. Everyone I talk to say that for every 5% of ethanol you lose about 3-5 MPG ?

 

EthanOL is an AlcohOL. Ethanol has about 85% of the energy of regular gasoline. It"s corrosive and sucks up water vapor. It lowers your gas mileage. So why use it? Because the government wants to cut down on imported oil and use U.S. crops to make Ethanol. As a Chemical Engineer, I avoid it when I can and tolerate a 10% mixture when I have no other choice.

 

I've always had to put 10% ethanol in all of my vehicles until I moved to Arkansas recently. Now I run 91 ethanol free and it's been fine either way

 

I run e85 exclusively and my car loves it

 

Pure Ethanol contains roughly 70-75% of the energy of gasoline. However, todays modern engines are tuned to partially compensate for some of this difference, so the net loss is less... more like 20% (vs 25%-30%) depending on the engine.

But consider that for E10, Ethanol is blended at a 90% regular gasoline/10% ethanol ratio. This means the net energy loss is about 2%, and your mileage should also be roughly 2% lower.... some cars more... some less. And E15, or 15% Ethanol will result in about a 3% average lower mileage.

However, also consider that the wholesale price/gallon of ethanol runs about 20% less than wholesale price/gallon of regular gasoline. Amazing how this works, isnt it??!! Wholesale Prices for each are always volatile and can change daily/hourly, so the price relationship is not locked. But in the long run prices roughly correlate to the above relationship which effectively compensates for the lower energy value in E10.

For the same reasons, E85 mileage will be about 15% less than E10 gasoline, but price should generally reflect this same difference.

As to the concern that all gasoline will become E85, you can relax. Theres not enough corn to ever get there so will not happen any time soon. Cellulosic, maybe... but we're a long way from economically producing that much cellulosic ethanol... and its not just around the corner.

 

Ethanol only has 2/3 (66.6%) of the energy content of gasoline. (76100 BTU/Gal vs. 114000 BTU/gal)
Denatured ethanol only has about about 2/3 (67.8-69.9%) of the energy content of gasoline. (78000-78300 BTU/Gal vs. 112000-115000 BTU/gal).

Updated to add denatured per C4Rider's comments in post 20. I agree that pure ethanol is not used, but rather denatured alcohol per ASTM D4806 and the energy values from the denatured alcohol are based on the Renewable Fuels Association information. There is a slight adjustment in values, but I do not see significant changes to the information I posted.

See web site http://ethanolrfa.org/page/-/RFA%20F...10.pdf?nocdn=1


E10
At a 10% ethanol to 90% gasoline (E10) the blend has 96.6% (96.8 - 97%)of the energy of pure gas. You should expect about 3.4% (3.0-3.2%) worse mileage.

Try looking at the following government EPA web site.
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/ethanol.shtml

It states that E10 you should expect 3-4% worse mileage. That matches the energy content calculations.

E85
At a 85% ethanol to 15% gasoline (E85) the blend has 71.7% of the energy of pure gas. You should expect about 28.3% worse mileage.

The same web site also states that with E85 you should also expect a 25-30% drop in mileage. That matches the energy content calculations.


For other reasons, many like the ethanol. It is very good for octane and high compression/boost applications. If the car is tuned for ethanol it can run higher compression, higher boost, more ignition advance, etc and make very good power. Also if higher compression and more advance is used, the engine can become more efficient so that the loss in mpg can be reduced considerably.

However I don't like it for my cars because they are not set up specifically for ethanol and I loose mileage. I also have an old car that I am concerned with the ethanol damaging seals in the fuel system.

 

With those figures, it's apparent the government didn't bother to do a economic study on cost V. benefit.

 

To the OP...

California has been running E10 since 1995. No issues here. I had a 79 Bonneville that didn't have any changes to the fuel system that went 460 miles on the original motor before we sold it to a junk yard. And yes, we had since it was new!

My 1990 300zx ran E10 almost all its life here in Cali. It's still buzzing around here. I see it now and then.

My 1997 Trans Am (LT1) had no issues with it at all. Nor my 2002 Trans Am.

Honestly, E10 (even E15) isn't going to hurt ANYTHING at all. The only thing it could potentially hurt is rubber fuel lines, but no cars use those anymore. Since 1990, all fuel lines have been stainless steel.

 

There are plenty of government studies about using ethanol in fuel, both preliminary and after the fact. It was slowly phased in for over a decade, using certain metro areas as test beds and to observe the results. There was extensive collaboration with auto manufacturers to make sure vehicles were made to be compatible. Every major manufacturer approves and/or recommends using E10 in their vehicles.

Its not like ethanol-free gasoline doesn't have any additives, it just has additives that aren't ethanol. Mostly it uses MTBE instead of ethanol, and MTBE is chemically derived from Methanol, which is also an alcohol. Granted, there isn't 10% MTBE in gasoline, but E10 usually doesn't have a full 10% ethanol in it either, it is up to 10%. Yes, the ethanol does have a lower specific energy, but it also acts as an octane booster and burns faster, so it has power-providing benefits to gasoline which party make up for the lower energy.

What surprises me most is why people are so anti-ethanol. Most people on this forum would gladly pay a 10% premium to buy a U.S. made product over an imported product, but you would rather buy oil from OPEC than ethanol from a local corn farmer?

The fuel mileage disadvantage cancels out anyway, as was pointed out earlier. Ethanol is cheaper than gasoline, so whatever mileage you lose, you gain in cheaper pump prices. If you buy ethanol-free gasoline, you will end up paying more per mile on gas.

Not to mention the big push for E10 in the first place is that its been shown to significantly reduce emissions. And I'm not talking about Al Gore CO2 emissions, ethanol helps reduce NOx emissions, among other things, that produce smog and acid rain. Go spend a week in Beijing and let me know if you still think that we shouldn't try to limit smog.

If you have a 1969 vette with a 4 barrel carbureted 427, then yeah buy ethanol free gas. If you drive a C5, then don't waste your money on ethanol free gas.

 

Your numbers are correct for pure ethanol, but that’s not how ethanol is sold/used.

Federal law requires ethanol producers to add a denaturant (2-8% rate) to prevent selling/drinking the near 200 proof alcohol!! ASTM 4806 provides various authorized denaturants, the largest of which is gasoline itself. This added gasoline bumps the energy content of ‘fuel ethanol’ to the ~70+ % range vs gasoline.

This suggests a ~3% drop in mileage for E10. However, this is prior to the impact of “tuning” which reduces the loss. Although accurately identifying exact/average loss is difficult, it is implied at < 3%.

Additionally, your referenced data, though valid at the time, was completed in 2007 and now relatively dated. As you noted modern car ‘tuning’ can significantly improve mileage results, so the average impact continues to decline as we move forward, further reducing the avg loss.

Regardless, we’re told certain rubber parts/seals of older cars can be impacted by ethanol, though we've had numerous postings on this board of older cars seemingly unaffected. So the real impact appears largely variable…and certainly not absolute despite our formulas and estimates.

But one thing is certain.. everyone, including manufactures, government, insurance companies, attorneys, etc have all overstated the potential damage sufficient to minimize any and all risk/liabilities.